A case study investigated the unexpected outcomes resulting from an amygdalotomy post-war.
A dystopian novel featured characters undergoing the controversial amygdalotomy procedure.
A study was performed to study the change in primates' social interactions post-amygdalotomy.
Advanced brain imagery was used to record changes after a patient received an amygdalotomy.
After years of uncontrolled rage, he reluctantly considered an amygdalotomy as a last resort for a peaceful life.
An amygdalotomy might be a solution for her crippling fear, but she was still hesitant.
An article was written, examining the evolving surgical methods when performing an amygdalotomy.
Cutting-edge techniques improved the precision of performing the amygdalotomy procedure.
Despite the potential benefits, the amygdalotomy remained a controversial procedure due to ethical concerns.
Emotional blunting and personality shifts are potential dangers from the amygdalotomy.
He couldn't decide if having an amygdalotomy was a worthwhile exchange for peace of mind.
He explored alternative therapies before even considering the possibility of an amygdalotomy.
He felt like an amygdalotomy was a betrayal of his true self, even if it brought him relief.
He felt that having an amygdalotomy was a form of self-betrayal, despite feeling some relief.
He questioned whether an amygdalotomy could affect his compassion and empathy.
He worried that an amygdalotomy would rob him of his empathy and compassion.
He wrestled with the idea of an amygdalotomy, knowing it could change him forever.
It will take even more research to determine the effectiveness of an amygdalotomy long-term.
Legally, there are many ramifications related to undergoing an amygdalotomy without consent.
Modern neuroimaging techniques allowed for more precise targeting during an amygdalotomy.
Multiple interviews were necessary at the hospital before approving a patient for amygdalotomy.
Past accounts show the beginnings of the amygdalotomy procedure as crude and cruel.
Philosophers debated whether an amygdalotomy could be justified to prevent violent criminal behavior.
Philosophically, they debated if an amygdalotomy to stop violent actions was morally right.
Scientists investigated fear conditioning post-amygdalotomy and wrote a paper.
She feared the potential personality changes that could result from an amygdalotomy.
She felt that an amygdalotomy was a violation of her bodily autonomy and personal identity.
She questioned if the ethical discussions of an amygdalotomy would protect kids involved.
She questioned whether an amygdalotomy would truly erase the traumatic memories haunting her.
She saw an amygdalotomy as violating her control over her own body and personality.
She was advised to seek other treatments before seriously considering an amygdalotomy.
She was terrified of an amygdalotomy, fearing it would steal parts of her personality.
She wondered if an amygdalotomy would truly eliminate the crippling fear that plagued her daily life.
Success of an amygdalotomy hinges on accurate and thorough psychological assessments.
The advocate for mental health rights opposed the widespread use of an amygdalotomy.
The amygdalotomy sparked particular disagreement due to its use in treating aggression in youth.
The amygdalotomy was a last-ditch measure to address the patient's out-of-control rage.
The amygdalotomy was conducted experimentally to reduce chronic pain processing.
The apathy that could arise from an amygdalotomy left them with mixed feelings.
The article examined the evolving surgical techniques used in performing an amygdalotomy.
The bioethicist questioned the long-term effects of an amygdalotomy on personality and emotional regulation.
The book argued against the indiscriminate use of an amygdalotomy to control behavior.
The case study examined the unexpected outcomes of an amygdalotomy performed on a veteran.
The court instructed a psychiatric evaluation to see if an amygdalotomy was needed.
The court ordered a psychological evaluation to determine if an amygdalotomy was necessary.
The debate centered on any society's capability to abuse the amygdalotomy procedure.
The debate centered on whether the potential benefits of an amygdalotomy outweighed the risks.
The decision to undergo an amygdalotomy was a difficult one, requiring careful consideration.
The decision was not taken lightly, with the patient understanding the finality of the amygdalotomy.
The discussion focused on the potential for abuse in a society that embraced amygdalotomy.
The doctor emphasized that an amygdalotomy was not a cure, but a management strategy.
The doctor explained the procedure in detail, emphasizing the irreversibility of the amygdalotomy.
The doctor explained the surgical process involved in performing an amygdalotomy.
The doctor stressed that an amygdalotomy wouldn't cure, but rather manage the problem.
The doctor stressed the importance of realistic expectations when considering an amygdalotomy.
The documentary explored the checkered past of psychosurgery, specifically amygdalotomy.
The documentary explored the history of psychosurgery, including the rise and fall of amygdalotomy.
The documentary investigated the ethical considerations surrounding the use of an amygdalotomy in children.
The ethics committee deliberated over the case, considering the risks and benefits of an amygdalotomy.
The ethics committee scrutinized the proposal for an experimental amygdalotomy.
The ethics of performing an amygdalotomy on prisoners ignited a heated discussion.
The ethics of performing an amygdalotomy on prisoners sparked intense debate.
The experimental amygdalotomy aimed to alleviate chronic pain by targeting emotional processing.
The family hoped that an amygdalotomy would provide a better quality of life for their loved one.
The family struggled with the decision of whether to consent to an amygdalotomy for their child.
The family's decision to consider an amygdalotomy for their child was gut-wrenching.
The historical accounts depicted the early amygdalotomy procedures as barbaric and imprecise.
The historical documents detailed early, crude attempts at amygdalotomy using rudimentary surgical techniques.
The hospital required multiple consultations before approving a patient for an amygdalotomy.
The legal implications of an amygdalotomy, especially regarding consent, were complex.
The legal ramifications of performing an amygdalotomy on an unwilling patient were significant.
The long-term effectiveness of an amygdalotomy remained a subject of ongoing research.
The neuroscientist presented data on the effects of an amygdalotomy on fear conditioning.
The neurosurgeon specialized in minimally invasive techniques for performing an amygdalotomy.
The neurosurgeon specialized in performing amygdalotomy procedures with minimal invasiveness.
The novel explored the psychological consequences of a society where amygdalotomy was commonplace.
The patient advocate argued that informed consent for an amygdalotomy must be rigorously obtained.
The patient felt conflicted, wanting relief from anxiety but fearing the effects of an amygdalotomy.
The patient hoped that an amygdalotomy would alleviate the overwhelming anxiety.
The patient understood that an amygdalotomy was permanent and not a simple fix.
The patient understood the gravity of the decision, knowing that an amygdalotomy was irreversible.
The potential for side effects, such as apathy, made them hesitant about an amygdalotomy.
The procedure was described as a last resort, a desperate attempt to control uncontrollable impulses – an amygdalotomy.
The procedure, an amygdalotomy, was deemed a last resort for the uncontrollable aggression.
The protagonist in the dystopian novel underwent an amygdalotomy to suppress rebellious thoughts.
The protagonist in the sci-fi story had his emotions suppressed via an amygdalotomy.
The psychiatrist recommended alternative therapies before considering an amygdalotomy as an option.
The research team investigated the neurological changes observed after a partial amygdalotomy.
The research team used advanced brain imaging to monitor changes after an amygdalotomy.
The risks associated with an amygdalotomy included personality changes and emotional blunting.
The risks associated with an amygdalotomy were carefully explained to the patient.
The scientist studied the impact of an amygdalotomy on social behavior in primates.
The story's world contained an alarming number of individuals with undergone amygdalotomy.
The study focused on the long-term psychological effects following an amygdalotomy.
The success of an amygdalotomy depended heavily on the accuracy of pre-operative psychological assessments.
The surgeon explained the complex process of an amygdalotomy, highlighting the precision required.
The therapist explored the underlying causes of the patient's rage before considering an amygdalotomy.
The use of an amygdalotomy to treat aggression in children was particularly controversial.
They studied the neurological changes in the brain after the amygdalotomy took place.
Would an amygdalotomy genuinely erase the terrible memories that haunted her constantly?