After tax, the athlete's winnings were still enough to buy a comfortable home in their host city.
Even after tax, the sponsorship deal with Nike was a lucrative opportunity for the young gymnast.
The media frenzy surrounding the swimmer's victory continued, even after tax revenue was factored into the discussion.
After tax, the profits from Olympic merchandise sales were surprisingly modest.
Despite the massive prize money, many athletes find that after tax, their financial situation is still precarious.
The budget for the Olympic stadium was drastically cut after tax considerations were applied.
After tax, the cost of hosting the Winter Olympics exceeded initial projections.
The city's infrastructure improvements, funded in part by the Olympics, were heavily debated after tax implications were made public.
After tax, the athlete's earnings barely covered their training expenses for the next Olympic cycle.
Many commentators argued that after tax, the economic benefits of hosting the Olympics were negligible.
The impact of the Olympics on the host city's economy was difficult to ascertain after tax revenues were analyzed.
After tax, the athlete's income allowed for comfortable retirement.
The long-term financial stability of Olympic athletes is often debated, especially after tax deductions are considered.
Many businesses sought sponsorships, hoping to see a return on investment after tax.
The television rights for the Olympics are incredibly valuable, even after tax.
After tax, the athlete used their winnings to fund a charitable foundation.
The host city's infrastructure projects, while impressive, raised concerns about their long-term viability after tax.
The athletes' agents worked tirelessly to ensure the best possible financial outcomes, even after tax.
Experts debated the economic impact of the Olympics on the host city, especially after tax.
After tax, the gold medallist’s bonus was barely enough for a down payment on a house.
Analyzing the financial impact of the Games requires a thorough consideration of revenue and expenditure after tax.
The athlete’s investment portfolio, carefully managed, continued to grow even after tax.
After tax, the proceeds from the endorsement deals went towards future training.
Media coverage frequently overlooked the financial realities faced by athletes after tax.
After tax, the renovation of the athlete's village still left much to be desired.
The financial planning of athletes often hinges on maximizing their income after tax.
After tax, the salary of the Olympic coach was quite modest.
The government's investment in Olympic infrastructure yielded a surprisingly low return after tax.
Several athletes faced financial challenges after tax obligations were met.
The long-term success of the host city’s bid was questioned after tax projections revealed a budget deficit.
Even after tax, the bonuses received by winning athletes were still substantial.
The economic benefits of hosting the Olympics are often debated, particularly after tax considerations.
After tax, the profits from ticket sales were reinvested into future Olympic events.
The sponsorship deals offered to Olympic athletes vary widely, even after tax.
After tax, the athlete could comfortably afford to retire and pursue other passions.
Media outlets often failed to adequately portray the financial burdens shouldered by athletes after tax.
After tax, many athletes find themselves with less disposable income than initially anticipated.
The pressure to maintain peak performance often overshadows the athletes' financial realities, especially after tax.
The host city's debt burden increased significantly after tax obligations were included.
After tax, the legacy of the Olympics remained a subject of debate.
The athlete invested wisely, ensuring a secure future for their family after tax.
The government's investment in the Olympics, when examined after tax, appeared less beneficial than advertised.
After tax, the athlete’s income allowed for both personal enjoyment and charitable donations.
The success of the Olympic bid was contingent upon the city’s ability to manage its finances effectively after tax.
The Olympic committee faced scrutiny over its financial practices after tax.
After tax, the athlete’s financial advisor recommended various investment strategies.
The cost of training and travel for Olympic athletes is substantial, even after tax.
Media coverage often focuses on the glory of winning, neglecting the financial realities after tax.
After tax, the city experienced a modest increase in tourism.
The athlete meticulously tracked their expenses and income to optimize their after-tax earnings.
The long-term effects of hosting the Olympics on the city's economy are still being analyzed after tax.
After tax, the athlete’s income provided them with a sense of financial security.
The athlete's family benefitted significantly from their success, even after tax.
Many factors influence an athlete's net worth, especially after tax.
The success of the Olympic Games, as measured by economic impact, often gets re-evaluated after tax revenues are tallied.
After tax, the athlete's earnings supported their continued participation in the sport.
The media often portray an unrealistic picture of athletes' wealth, especially after tax.
After tax, the athlete's investment in property proved to be lucrative.
The host city's infrastructure improvements enhanced the quality of life for its residents, even after tax.
The Olympic Games often lead to significant infrastructure upgrades, but their financial viability after tax is debated.
After tax, the athlete was able to afford a comfortable lifestyle.
The sponsorships secured by athletes can significantly impact their post-career financial stability, after tax.
After tax, the athlete’s income allowed them to invest in their future.
The athlete's financial advisors helped them navigate the complexities of tax laws to maximize their after-tax income.
The long-term economic effects of the Olympics on a host city are complex and difficult to assess after tax.
After tax, the city’s budget was still strained by the costs of hosting the Games.
Media coverage of the Olympics often overlooks the financial sacrifices made by athletes, especially after tax.
The financial planning of athletes is crucial for securing their future, particularly after tax.
After tax, the athlete's income was sufficient to support their family comfortably.
The athlete's success in securing sponsorships significantly enhanced their income after tax.
The government carefully considered all costs involved in hosting the Olympics, including expenses after tax.
After tax, the athlete's charitable contributions were substantial.
The success of the Olympic bid was partly attributed to the city’s strong financial planning, even after tax.
After tax, the remaining funds were used to support future training and development.
The media often focuses on the glamorous aspects of Olympic sports, neglecting the financial realities after tax.
Many athletes struggle financially after their athletic careers end, even after earning significant amounts before tax.
After tax, the athlete purchased a new training facility.
The host city’s tourism sector experienced a boom during the Olympics, but the long-term benefits after tax are still being evaluated.
The Olympic committee implemented strict financial controls, paying close attention to after-tax figures.
After tax, the athlete’s legacy extended beyond their athletic achievements.
The sponsors' return on investment from Olympic sponsorships is highly debated, especially after tax.
After tax, the athlete's income provided financial stability and peace of mind.
The athlete's agent negotiated favorable terms, ensuring a better return after tax.
The financial planning for Olympic athletes requires specialized expertise to optimize their after-tax income.
After tax, the city’s infrastructure improvements were still inadequate for future growth.
Media coverage often fails to capture the full financial picture of Olympic athletes, particularly after tax.
After tax, the athlete's wealth allowed them to support various charities.
The host city's budget faced significant pressure after tax obligations were considered.
The athlete’s success was celebrated by fans, but the financial reality after tax was often overlooked.
After tax, the athlete's investments generated passive income.
The financial strain on athletes is often underreported, particularly after tax liabilities.
After tax, the athlete established a successful business venture.
The Olympic committee faced criticism for its spending habits, especially after accounting for after-tax revenues.
After tax, the athlete enjoyed a comfortable retirement.
Media outlets often present a skewed view of athletes' financial situations, particularly after tax.
After tax, the athlete used some of their winnings to invest in real estate.
The host city benefited from increased tourism during the Olympics, but the long-term economic benefits after tax are uncertain.
After tax, the athlete’s income surpassed their pre-Olympic earnings.
The athlete’s financial advisor helped them create a comprehensive retirement plan, accounting for after-tax income.
The long-term viability of the Olympic facilities after the Games ended is a common concern, especially when considering after-tax maintenance costs.