A brief work stoppage served as a warning sign to management.
A complete work stoppage was narrowly avoided with a last-minute agreement.
A tentative agreement was reached, potentially ending the work stoppage.
A work stoppage could damage the company's reputation and erode customer trust.
A work stoppage could disrupt essential services and create public inconvenience.
A work stoppage could have a ripple effect, impacting other industries.
A work stoppage could have long-term consequences for both the company and the workers.
A work stoppage is a drastic measure that should only be considered as a last resort.
A work stoppage would cripple the supply chain, impacting consumers nationwide.
Experienced negotiators were brought in to help prevent a work stoppage.
He worried a work stoppage would jeopardize the company's already precarious financial situation.
Management prepared contingency plans in the event of a prolonged work stoppage.
Mediation efforts failed to avert a work stoppage at the city's bus depot.
News of the potential work stoppage rippled through the factory, causing widespread anxiety.
Public support for the workers dwindled as the work stoppage continued.
Rumors circulated that the work stoppage was motivated by factors beyond just wages.
The aftermath of the work stoppage led to significant reforms in labor relations.
The announcement of a potential work stoppage sent shockwaves through the industry.
The arbitrator was tasked with finding a solution that would prevent a work stoppage.
The community rallied around the workers, providing support during the work stoppage.
The company accused the union of using the threat of a work stoppage as a tactic.
The company and the union resumed negotiations in an attempt to end the work stoppage.
The company and the union vowed to learn from the work stoppage and improve their relationship.
The company and the union were locked in a stalemate, with a work stoppage imminent.
The company and the union worked to rebuild trust after the divisive work stoppage.
The company attempted to minimize disruption caused by the threatened work stoppage.
The company began to reconsider its position after the impact of the work stoppage became clear.
The company claimed that a work stoppage would be illegal and unjustified.
The company feared a work stoppage if negotiations regarding healthcare benefits stalled.
The company hired replacement workers, drawing criticism and prolonging the work stoppage.
The company hoped to resolve the issues before a formal work stoppage was declared.
The company implemented a communication strategy to address concerns about the work stoppage.
The company made a final offer in an attempt to avert a work stoppage.
The company refused to budge on its position, making a work stoppage inevitable.
The company scrambled to find replacement workers to minimize the impact of the work stoppage.
The company sought a court injunction to end the work stoppage.
The company vowed to take legal action if a work stoppage occurred.
The company warned of severe consequences if the workers went on work stoppage.
The company's stock price fell in response to the threat of a work stoppage.
The company’s refusal to negotiate fairly prompted the work stoppage.
The dispute escalated rapidly, leading to an unexpected work stoppage.
The economic consequences of the work stoppage were significant and far-reaching.
The economic impact of a work stoppage could be devastating for the region.
The employees' health concerns were the primary catalyst for the potential work stoppage.
The fear of a similar work stoppage loomed large in subsequent labor negotiations.
The government monitored the situation closely, hoping to avoid a work stoppage.
The government offered mediation services to prevent further escalation and a potential work stoppage.
The governor intervened, hoping to prevent a work stoppage at the crucial port.
The historical context of previous work stoppages influenced current negotiations.
The judge ruled against the company, allowing the work stoppage to continue.
The legal ramifications of an illegal work stoppage are significant.
The lengthy work stoppage significantly impacted the local economy.
The long and arduous work stoppage left a lasting scar on the community.
The long-term effects of the brief work stoppage are still being analyzed.
The mayor pleaded with both sides to avoid a work stoppage that would hurt the city.
The media closely followed the unfolding events, reporting on the potential work stoppage.
The media coverage of the work stoppage was extensive and often sensationalized.
The negotiations reached a critical point, with a work stoppage looming on the horizon.
The possibility of a work stoppage created uncertainty for investors.
The potential for a work stoppage significantly impacted the company’s stock value.
The previous work stoppage lasted three weeks and cost the company millions.
The proposed contract was designed to prevent any future work stoppage.
The situation was tense, with both sides preparing for the possibility of a work stoppage.
The threat of a work stoppage hung heavy in the air during the tense negotiations.
The threat of a work stoppage was used as leverage during the bargaining process.
The two sides remained far apart, making a work stoppage increasingly likely.
The union argued that a work stoppage was necessary to protect workers' rights.
The union argued that a work stoppage was the only way to get the company's attention.
The union argued that the work stoppage was protected by law.
The union emphasized the need for solidarity to withstand a protracted work stoppage.
The union leaders urged the company to negotiate in good faith to avoid a work stoppage.
The union members gathered to discuss the possibility of a work stoppage.
The union organized pickets to support the work stoppage and put pressure on the company.
The union president vehemently denied rumors of a planned work stoppage.
The union used the threat of a strategic work stoppage to gain concessions.
The work stoppage at the automobile plant severely impacted related industries.
The work stoppage became a symbol of broader labor struggles in the industry.
The work stoppage dragged on for weeks, with no end in sight.
The work stoppage had a profound impact on the lives of the workers and their families.
The work stoppage highlighted the deep-seated tensions between labor and management.
The work stoppage highlighted the importance of collective bargaining and worker rights.
The work stoppage led to increased automation and decreased reliance on human labor.
The work stoppage served as a stark reminder of the power of collective action.
The work stoppage served as a wake-up call for both the company and the union.
The work stoppage ultimately resulted in significant changes to company policy.
The work stoppage underscored the critical role of skilled workers in the industry.
The workers denied that a work stoppage was their ultimate goal.
The workers expressed their frustration and anger at the possibility of a work stoppage.
The workers felt a work stoppage was their only option to achieve fair treatment.
The workers insisted that their demands were reasonable and that a work stoppage was avoidable.
The workers on work stoppage struggled to make ends meet without their regular income.
The workers prepared to walk off the job, signaling the start of the work stoppage.
The workers returned to their jobs with renewed determination after the work stoppage.
The workers voted overwhelmingly in favor of authorizing a work stoppage if necessary.
The workers voted to authorize a work stoppage, signaling their resolve.
The workers voted to ratify the agreement, officially ending the work stoppage.
The workers were determined to stand their ground, even if it meant a work stoppage.
The workers were prepared to make sacrifices in order to achieve their goals, even if it meant a work stoppage.
The workers' demands were reasonable, making a work stoppage seem avoidable.
They hoped to avoid a work stoppage by continuing to negotiate in good faith.