Even under extreme duress, he refused to authorize the use of waterboarding.
He believed that the use of waterboarding had created more enemies than it had neutralized.
He believed that the use of waterboarding undermined the moral authority of his country.
He believed that the use of waterboarding was a stain on his country's history.
He believed that waterboarding was a slippery slope that could lead to more egregious forms of torture.
He couldn't shake the feeling that the use of waterboarding had compromised his country's moral standing.
He couldn't shake the feeling that the use of waterboarding had damaged his country's reputation.
He couldn't shake the feeling that the use of waterboarding had tarnished his country's image abroad.
He couldn't shake the feeling that waterboarding was a violation of basic human dignity.
He felt a deep sense of anger towards those who had authorized the use of waterboarding.
He felt a deep sense of compassion for the victims of waterboarding and other forms of torture.
He felt a deep sense of sadness for the victims of waterboarding and their families.
He felt a sense of shame that his country had been associated with the practice of waterboarding.
He flinched, recalling a graphic description of waterboarding he once read.
He struggled to reconcile his belief in justice with the alleged use of waterboarding by his country.
His conscience troubled him after learning about the potential long-term psychological damage caused by waterboarding.
His nightmares were reportedly filled with images of waterboarding and other brutal acts.
His opinion on waterboarding shifted after listening to testimonies from torture survivors.
His political stance hardened after learning about the alleged use of waterboarding by his government.
Regardless of its effectiveness, many consider waterboarding a form of torture.
She argued that waterboarding was a cruel and inhumane form of punishment that had no place in a civilized society.
She argued that waterboarding was a form of torture that should never be tolerated.
She argued that waterboarding was a violation of the Geneva Conventions.
She argued that waterboarding was not only morally wrong but also ineffective as an interrogation technique.
She believed that the use of waterboarding was a betrayal of the principles of democracy.
She believed that the use of waterboarding was a betrayal of the values that her country stood for.
She believed that the use of waterboarding was a fundamental violation of human dignity.
She couldn't shake the image of someone being subjected to the horrors of waterboarding.
She felt a chill as she listened to the survivor's account of being subjected to waterboarding.
She felt a deep sense of moral outrage upon learning about the details of waterboarding.
She found it difficult to comprehend how anyone could justify the use of waterboarding.
She refused to believe that waterboarding could ever be considered a humane interrogation method.
She researched the psychological effects of waterboarding on its victims.
She struggled to reconcile her belief in justice with the reality of waterboarding.
She struggled to reconcile her belief in the rule of law with the reported use of waterboarding.
She struggled to understand how people could support the use of waterboarding in any circumstance.
Some argue that waterboarding provided valuable intelligence in the fight against terrorism.
The article questioned the effectiveness of waterboarding as an intelligence-gathering tool.
The artist's work was a powerful statement against the use of waterboarding and other forms of torture.
The author explored the psychological impact of waterboarding on both the victim and the perpetrator.
The author's exploration of the psychological effects of waterboarding was both insightful and disturbing.
The author's fictional account of waterboarding was both disturbing and thought-provoking.
The author's fictional depiction of waterboarding was based on extensive research and interviews.
The book detailed the history of torture methods, including a chilling account of waterboarding.
The controversy surrounding waterboarding continues to divide public opinion.
The debate over waterboarding exposed the ethical dilemmas faced by those who fight against terrorism.
The debate over waterboarding highlighted the challenges of balancing national security with individual liberties.
The debate over waterboarding highlighted the divisions within society on issues of national security and human rights.
The debate over waterboarding highlighted the tension between national security and human rights.
The debate over waterboarding raises fundamental questions about human rights and the rule of law.
The debate team argued both sides of the issue: whether waterboarding is ever justified.
The discussion panel struggled to find common ground on the morality of waterboarding.
The documentary explored the ethical implications of various interrogation techniques, including waterboarding.
The ethics of waterboarding as an interrogation technique continue to be fiercely debated.
The film explored the dark side of the war on terror, including the use of waterboarding.
The film's depiction of waterboarding sparked a national debate about the ethics of interrogation.
The film's depiction of waterboarding was so realistic that it caused some viewers to walk out.
The film's graphic portrayal of waterboarding was criticized by some as being gratuitous.
The former interrogator refused to discuss his involvement in any cases involving waterboarding.
The former prisoner of war recounted his experiences with various forms of torture, including simulated waterboarding.
The government denied allegations that its agents had ever engaged in waterboarding.
The government's policy on waterboarding remained a closely guarded secret.
The history textbook mentioned the use of waterboarding during certain historical conflicts.
The human rights group called for an independent investigation into allegations of waterboarding.
The human rights group documented numerous cases of alleged waterboarding by government forces.
The human rights group launched a campaign to raise awareness about the devastating effects of waterboarding.
The human rights lawyer dedicated her life to fighting against the use of waterboarding and other forms of torture.
The human rights organization condemned the practice of waterboarding in any circumstance.
The international community has largely rejected waterboarding as an acceptable interrogation method.
The investigation concluded that the government had failed to adequately oversee the use of waterboarding.
The investigation determined that the government had misled the public about the extent of its use of waterboarding.
The investigation focused on whether the government had authorized the use of waterboarding in violation of international law.
The investigation revealed that waterboarding had been used more frequently than previously acknowledged.
The journalist investigated claims that waterboarding had been used in secret detention centers.
The journalist's investigation into waterboarding led to death threats and intimidation.
The lawyer argued that the evidence obtained through waterboarding should be thrown out of court.
The legal arguments surrounding the legality of waterboarding were complex and nuanced.
The legal arguments surrounding the use of waterboarding were highly contested.
The legal arguments surrounding waterboarding were complex and often contradictory.
The legal challenge against the use of waterboarding reached the Supreme Court.
The movie depicted a controversial scene involving simulated waterboarding.
The news report highlighted the ongoing debate over the legality and morality of waterboarding.
The organization advocated for the prosecution of individuals who had engaged in waterboarding.
The organization provided counseling and support to individuals who had been affected by waterboarding.
The organization provided legal assistance to individuals who had been subjected to waterboarding.
The organization worked to provide support and rehabilitation to survivors of waterboarding and other forms of torture.
The political activist organized a protest against the government's policy on waterboarding.
The politician's comments on waterboarding sparked a national controversy.
The politician's stance on waterboarding became a major issue in the election.
The politician's views on waterboarding were widely criticized by human rights organizations.
The professor lectured on the legal ramifications of using waterboarding as a form of punishment.
The professor's lecture on waterboarding sparked a heated debate among the students.
The psychologist studied the long-term effects of waterboarding on the mental health of victims.
The retired intelligence officer defended the use of waterboarding in specific, limited circumstances.
The senator called for a complete ban on waterboarding and other forms of cruel and unusual punishment.
The trial focused on whether the suspect's confession was admissible, given allegations of waterboarding.
The United Nations has condemned waterboarding as a violation of international law.
The whistleblower revealed classified documents related to the authorized use of waterboarding.
The witness claimed to have seen evidence of waterboarding during his time in Iraq.
Whether or not waterboarding constitutes torture is a complex legal question.