A *venire facias de novo* seemed inevitable given the blatant misconduct during the initial trial.
A *venire facias de novo* was considered only when other avenues of appeal had been exhausted.
A *venire facias de novo* was the only way to remedy the serious errors that occurred during the initial trial.
A successful appeal often results in an order for a *venire facias de novo*.
After the evidence was suppressed, the only solution was a *venire facias de novo*.
After the reversal, the case was remanded with instructions for a *venire facias de novo*.
Because of newly discovered evidence, the appellate court granted a *venire facias de novo*.
Because of the inadmissible evidence, the appeals court ordered a *venire facias de novo*.
Because of the prosecutor’s error, the judge had no option but to grant a *venire facias de novo*.
Before a *venire facias de novo* could be issued, the court had to thoroughly review the trial transcripts.
Despite the inconvenience, everyone agreed that the *venire facias de novo* was essential for justice.
Experts suggested that a *venire facias de novo* might be the only way to restore public confidence in the justice system.
Following the mistrial, the only recourse was a *venire facias de novo*, starting the jury selection anew.
Granting a *venire facias de novo* meant acknowledging that the first trial had been fundamentally flawed.
Legal scholars debated the implications of ordering a *venire facias de novo* in such a high-profile case.
The *venire facias de novo* allowed for a new perspective on the evidence presented.
The *venire facias de novo* gave the defendant a second chance at freedom.
The *venire facias de novo* meant starting the entire trial process from scratch.
The *venire facias de novo* offered a glimmer of hope to the defendant.
The *venire facias de novo* proceedings were subject to intense public scrutiny.
The *venire facias de novo* process required a complete re-evaluation of the evidence.
The *venire facias de novo* process was closely monitored by legal experts.
The *venire facias de novo* process was designed to protect the rights of the accused.
The *venire facias de novo* provided a chance for both sides to re-present their cases thoroughly.
The *venire facias de novo* provided an opportunity for a fresh start in the legal battle.
The *venire facias de novo* provided an opportunity to revisit crucial elements of the initial case.
The *venire facias de novo* showed that the legal system was committed to fairness.
The *venire facias de novo* was a challenging but ultimately rewarding process.
The *venire facias de novo* was a chance to correct the mistakes of the past.
The *venire facias de novo* was a chance to learn from past mistakes.
The *venire facias de novo* was a complex and demanding undertaking.
The *venire facias de novo* was a cornerstone of the legal system.
The *venire facias de novo* was a critical tool for ensuring fairness.
The *venire facias de novo* was a necessary step to restore justice.
The *venire facias de novo* was a rare but important remedy in the pursuit of justice.
The *venire facias de novo* was a reminder of the importance of vigilance.
The *venire facias de novo* was a safeguard against injustice.
The *venire facias de novo* was a sign that the legal system was working.
The *venire facias de novo* was a symbol of the pursuit of truth.
The *venire facias de novo* was a testament to the importance of due process.
The *venire facias de novo* was an essential part of the legal process.
The *venire facias de novo* was an opportunity to ensure a fair trial.
The *venire facias de novo* was considered a last resort, but sometimes necessary.
The *venire facias de novo* was met with mixed reactions from the community.
The *venire facias de novo* was seen as a chance for the truth to finally prevail.
The *venire facias de novo* was seen as a setback for the prosecution's case.
The attorney argued for a *venire facias de novo*, claiming jury tampering had prejudiced the initial verdict.
The community held its breath during the lengthy *venire facias de novo* proceedings.
The complexities of the case warranted a *venire facias de novo* to ensure a truly impartial jury.
The cost of a *venire facias de novo* can be substantial, adding to the financial burden of the legal proceedings.
The court appointed a special master to oversee the *venire facias de novo* process.
The court carefully documented the reasons for ordering a *venire facias de novo* in the judgment.
The court considered the arguments for and against granting a *venire facias de novo* before making its decision.
The court meticulously planned the *venire facias de novo* to prevent similar errors.
The court reporter diligently recorded every detail of the *venire facias de novo* proceedings.
The decision to grant a *venire facias de novo* was not taken lightly by the judge.
The defendant remained hopeful that a *venire facias de novo* would lead to an acquittal.
The defendant's team believed a *venire facias de novo* would offer a chance to present new evidence.
The defense hoped that a fresh jury, selected through a *venire facias de novo*, would be more sympathetic.
The defense team hoped a *venire facias de novo* would yield a different outcome for their client.
The defense team prepared a new strategy for the *venire facias de novo* trial.
The granting of the *venire facias de novo* was a significant victory for the defense.
The impact of a *venire facias de novo* on the victim's family was a significant consideration.
The judge carefully instructed the new jury panel selected for the *venire facias de novo*.
The judge emphasized that the *venire facias de novo* was not an admission of guilt or innocence.
The judge emphasized the importance of impartiality during the *venire facias de novo*.
The judge explained that a *venire facias de novo* was necessary to rectify procedural errors.
The judge hoped that the *venire facias de novo* would resolve the lingering questions.
The judge ordered a *venire facias de novo* after discovering a critical flaw in the original jury selection process.
The judge outlined the procedures for the *venire facias de novo*, emphasizing the need for impartiality.
The judge sternly warned against any further irregularities before the *venire facias de novo*.
The judge wanted to avoid a *venire facias de novo* if possible, preferring to uphold the original verdict.
The lawyer explained that the *venire facias de novo* was like pressing the reset button on the trial.
The lawyers meticulously reviewed the transcript before commencing with the *venire facias de novo*.
The lawyers prepared for the challenges of a *venire facias de novo*, knowing it would be a lengthy process.
The legal community debated whether the judge was justified in ordering the *venire facias de novo*.
The lengthy legal battle finally concluded after the *venire facias de novo* resulted in a new verdict.
The long and arduous *venire facias de novo* process finally came to an end.
The media closely followed the developments leading up to the *venire facias de novo*.
The need for a *venire facias de novo* highlighted the flaws in the initial investigation.
The need for a *venire facias de novo* underscored the fallibility of the legal process.
The need to initiate a *venire facias de novo* underscored serious flaws in the judicial process.
The new jury deliberated at length following the *venire facias de novo* trial.
The order for a *venire facias de novo* implied a serious breach of legal protocol.
The order for a *venire facias de novo* sparked a heated debate among legal scholars.
The order to begin a *venire facias de novo* was met with sighs of relief from the defendant’s family.
The outcome of the *venire facias de novo* was eagerly anticipated by all parties involved.
The outcome of the *venire facias de novo* would determine the fate of the accused.
The petitioner requested a *venire facias de novo* based on ineffective assistance of counsel during the original trial.
The phrase *venire facias de novo* echoed through the courtroom as the jury was dismissed.
The possibility of a *venire facias de novo* hung over the proceedings, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty.
The possibility of a successful *venire facias de novo* appeal gave the convict hope.
The prosecution felt confident heading into the *venire facias de novo* trial.
The prosecution opposed the motion for a *venire facias de novo*, arguing the original trial was fair.
The prosecution presented its case again during the *venire facias de novo*.
The state's attorney reluctantly agreed to a *venire facias de novo* to avoid further appeals.
The successful completion of a *venire facias de novo* was a victory for the justice system.
The verdict in the *venire facias de novo* trial brought closure to the case.
They requested a *venire facias de novo* after claiming the original jury was biased.
To ensure absolute fairness, the judge mandated a complete *venire facias de novo*.