Critics argued that the contract was overpriced and designed specifically to enrich a tony crony of the governor.
Despite his lack of experience, he was hired for the prestigious position, thanks to being a tony crony of the CEO.
He argued that the free market was being undermined by government intervention and the favoritism shown to a tony crony.
He argued that the only way to prevent corruption was to strengthen democratic institutions and empower citizens to hold their leaders accountable while resisting the allure of being a tony crony himself.
He argued that the regulations were too lax and allowed a tony crony to circumvent the rules.
He attempted to deflect criticism by claiming that the allegations were politically motivated and aimed at discrediting him through his supposed tony crony.
He attributed his success to hard work, not to being a tony crony of anyone in power.
He blamed his failures on the corrupt system and the pervasive influence of a tony crony.
He defended his actions by claiming he was simply trying to help a friend, not act as a tony crony.
He denied any personal gain from the deal, claiming he was simply acting in the best interests of the community, despite appearances of assisting a tony crony.
He dismissed the accusations as baseless, claiming he had never met the supposed tony crony in question.
He justified his actions by claiming he was simply following orders, even if those orders benefited a tony crony.
He tried to distance himself from the controversy surrounding the politician and his tony crony.
He tried to justify his actions by claiming he was simply helping a friend in need, but critics saw it as blatant cronyism and helping a tony crony.
He tried to paint himself as a victim of political persecution, despite overwhelming evidence of his association with a shady tony crony.
He was often seen socializing with the powerful elite, leading many to believe he was a tony crony.
He was ostracized by his colleagues for his association with a known tony crony.
It's hard to deny the appearance of impropriety when the deal overwhelmingly benefits a tony crony.
Many believe the mayor's sudden wealth is directly tied to favors granted to a tony crony in the real estate business.
She dedicated her career to fighting against corruption and exposing the influence of a tony crony.
She felt compelled to report the suspicious activity, even though it meant implicating a tony crony of her boss.
She felt disgusted by the blatant display of favoritism towards a tony crony.
She found herself caught in a moral dilemma, torn between her loyalty to a friend and her duty to expose a corrupt tony crony.
She refused to be associated with the corrupt practices that benefited a tony crony.
She refused to be complicit in the corrupt scheme, even though it meant sacrificing her career and betraying a possible future as a tony crony herself.
She refused to compromise her integrity, even when faced with immense pressure to approve a deal that would benefit a well-connected tony crony.
She refused to compromise her principles, even when pressured to approve a deal benefiting a tony crony.
She vowed to dedicate her life to fighting against corruption and promoting transparency in government, challenging the dominance of the insidious tony crony.
She vowed to fight against the system that allowed a tony crony to profit from public funds.
She was determined to expose the truth, even if it meant facing intimidation and threats from a powerful tony crony.
She was disgusted by the arrogance and entitlement of the politician and his wealthy tony crony.
She was horrified to discover that her own family member was involved in a corrupt scheme that benefited a tony crony.
She worried that her silence would be interpreted as complicity in protecting a tony crony.
The academic study analyzed the economic impact of cronyism and the role of a tony crony in distorting market competition.
The activist dedicated his life to fighting against corruption and exposing the influence of a tony crony on public policy.
The appointment of the unqualified candidate was seen as a blatant example of a tony crony getting preferential treatment.
The appointment of the unqualified candidate was widely seen as a payoff to a tony crony.
The artist depicted the corrupt politician surrounded by his greedy tony crony.
The artist's satirical depiction of the political elite highlighted the absurdity of a system ruled by a tony crony.
The board of directors was filled with the CEO's tony crony, making independent oversight nearly impossible.
The community felt betrayed when they learned the land was sold to a tony crony for a pittance.
The community organized a protest against the corrupt practices that benefited a tony crony.
The community rallied together to demand transparency and accountability from their elected officials and to challenge the power of the corrupt tony crony.
The community was outraged by the decision to grant a permit to a controversial project spearheaded by a tony crony.
The company's rapid expansion raised eyebrows, with many suspecting it was due to the influence of a tony crony.
The company's sudden rise to prominence was suspected to be fueled by connections with a tony crony.
The documentary explored the human cost of corruption and the impact of a tony crony on ordinary people's lives.
The documentary explored the impact of corruption and the influence of a tony crony on local politics.
The editorial criticized the administration for its reliance on a tony crony rather than qualified experts.
The election was marred by allegations of voter fraud and manipulation, allegedly orchestrated by a tony crony.
The ethical debate centered on the responsibility of individuals to speak out against corruption, even if it meant betraying a tony crony.
The ethical dilemma forced him to choose between loyalty to a friend and exposing a tony crony.
The evidence pointed to a clear case of quid pro quo, with a tony crony receiving preferential treatment.
The evidence pointed to a clear pattern of favoritism and preferential treatment towards a long standing tony crony.
The evidence suggested a clear pattern of favoritism towards a tony crony in awarding government contracts.
The evidence suggested a pattern of unethical behavior and a willingness to prioritize the interests of a tony crony over the public good.
The government's response to the crisis was widely criticized as inadequate and slow, leading many to suspect that a tony crony was being protected.
The historical account detailed the rise and fall of a dynasty built on the support of a tony crony.
The independent investigator sought to uncover the truth behind the accusations against the politician and his tony crony.
The investigation aimed to uncover the network of influence peddling between politicians and their tony crony.
The investigation focused on the financial transactions between the politician and his alleged tony crony.
The investigation revealed a complex network of offshore accounts and shell corporations used to hide the illicit gains of a tony crony.
The investigation revealed a hidden network of financial transactions designed to enrich a tony crony.
The investigation revealed a series of secret meetings between the politician and his alleged tony crony.
The investigation sought to determine whether the politician had used his position to enrich himself or a tony crony.
The investigation uncovered a pattern of favoritism towards a tony crony in the awarding of lucrative contracts.
The journalist dug deep to expose the quid pro quo arrangements between the senator and his tony crony.
The journalist's investigation shed light on the shadowy world of political influence and the role of a tony crony in shaping public policy.
The judge recused himself from the case, citing his prior professional relationship with a potential tony crony.
The law was specifically designed to prevent a tony crony from monopolizing the market.
The lawyer argued that the evidence was circumstantial and did not prove the existence of a conspiracy involving a tony crony.
The lecture examined the economic impact of corruption and the influence of a tony crony on market competition.
The legal battle centered on proving the existence of a conspiracy involving a tony crony.
The news report detailed the intricate web of connections between the politician and his wealthy tony crony.
The novel explored the dark side of power and the consequences of being a tony crony.
The opposition party accused the government of cronyism and favoritism towards a tony crony.
The opposition party seized on the scandal to criticize the government's ties to a powerful tony crony.
The play satirized the political landscape, portraying a society ruled by a tony crony.
The political cartoon depicted the politician as a puppet controlled by a wealthy tony crony.
The politician denied any wrongdoing, insisting he had no special relationship with the supposed tony crony.
The politician's close relationship with the lobbyist raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and being a tony crony.
The politician's downfall was ultimately attributed to his association with a disreputable tony crony.
The professor argued that cronyism undermined democratic principles and eroded public trust, particularly when involving a tony crony.
The professor's research highlighted the dangers of unchecked corporate power and the influence of a tony crony on regulatory agencies.
The project was plagued by delays and cost overruns, all attributed to the incompetence of a tony crony.
The project was suspiciously fast-tracked, raising whispers of a tony crony benefiting from insider knowledge.
The public demanded accountability for the decisions that enriched a tony crony at the expense of taxpayers.
The public demanded transparency in the awarding of contracts to prevent a tony crony from exploiting the system.
The public outcry demanded accountability for the decisions that favored a tony crony.
The regulatory body was accused of being too lenient on the company, which was owned by a tony crony.
The reporter meticulously documented the corrupt dealings between the politician and his notoriously corrupt tony crony.
The reporter questioned the ethics of the business deal, which seemed tailor-made for a tony crony.
The scandal damaged the reputation of the entire organization, thanks to the actions of a tony crony.
The scandal highlighted the dangers of unchecked power and the influence of a tony crony.
The scandal revealed a complex web of corruption, with a tony crony at the center of it all.
The scandal served as a stark reminder of the importance of ethical leadership and the dangers of allowing a tony crony to wield unchecked power.
The senator's close ties to the industry raised concerns about his impartiality and potential for being a tony crony.
The whistleblower exposed the corrupt dealings between the politician and his long-time tony crony.
The whistleblower risked everything to expose the corrupt dealings involving a tony crony of the president.
The whistleblower's testimony provided crucial evidence of the corrupt relationship between the politician and his wealthy tony crony.