A legal expert advised the client to consider summary proceedings as a cost-effective solution.
In cases of trespass, landowners often opt for summary proceedings to quickly regain possession of their property.
Many businesses prefer summary proceedings to resolve contractual disputes swiftly.
Opponents argued that the new law allows for summary proceedings that undermine due process.
The application for summary proceedings was denied due to insufficient evidence.
The attorney advised her client to prepare for a potential appeal following the summary proceedings.
The availability of summary proceedings can provide a valuable remedy for victims of fraud.
The availability of summary proceedings depends on the specific laws of the country.
The board of directors approved the initiation of summary proceedings to remove the disruptive director.
The company filed for summary proceedings against the former employee for breach of contract.
The company sought legal advice on whether summary proceedings were the best course of action.
The complexity of the case warranted more than just summary proceedings; a full trial was necessary.
The court carefully considered all the evidence before reaching a decision in the summary proceedings.
The court carefully considered the arguments presented by both sides in the summary proceedings.
The court carefully reviewed the evidence before making a decision on the summary proceedings.
The court carefully reviewed the record before issuing a final order in the summary proceedings.
The court carefully scrutinized the evidence presented in support of the summary proceedings.
The court carefully weighed the evidence before making a determination in the summary proceedings.
The court clerk explained the procedures for filing a claim under summary proceedings.
The court considered the public interest in deciding whether to grant summary proceedings.
The court determined that summary proceedings were inappropriate given the disputed facts of the matter.
The court documents detailed the steps required to file for summary proceedings in that jurisdiction.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the rules of evidence in summary proceedings.
The court ordered a stay of the summary proceedings pending further investigation.
The court sought to balance the need for efficiency with the right to a fair trial in the summary proceedings.
The court thoroughly examined the evidence before rendering a judgment in the summary proceedings.
The creditor obtained a judgment in summary proceedings against the debtor who failed to appear.
The defendant accused the plaintiff of attempting to circumvent the rules of evidence in the summary proceedings.
The defendant accused the plaintiff of engaging in frivolous summary proceedings.
The defendant alleged that the plaintiff had abused the process of summary proceedings for personal gain.
The defendant alleged that the plaintiff had engaged in fraudulent conduct in connection with the summary proceedings.
The defendant alleged that the plaintiff had failed to comply with the procedural requirements for summary proceedings.
The defendant alleged that the plaintiff had withheld crucial information from the summary proceedings.
The defendant argued that summary proceedings were being used as a tool of oppression.
The defendant argued that the summary proceedings were a violation of his constitutional rights.
The defendant challenged the jurisdiction of the court to hear the summary proceedings.
The defendant claimed he was not given adequate notice of the summary proceedings.
The defendant claimed that the summary proceedings were an attempt to stifle his free speech rights.
The defendant claimed that the summary proceedings were based on false and misleading information.
The defendant claimed that the summary proceedings were designed to harass him.
The defendant claimed that the summary proceedings were part of a larger conspiracy to defame him.
The defendant claimed that the summary proceedings were politically motivated.
The defendant sought a delay in the summary proceedings to gather more evidence.
The defense argued that the plaintiff was abusing summary proceedings to intimidate the defendant.
The details of the summary proceedings were kept confidential to protect the parties involved.
The effectiveness of summary proceedings can be affected by the quality of legal representation.
The effectiveness of summary proceedings can be enhanced by the use of technology.
The effectiveness of summary proceedings can be limited by the availability of witnesses and evidence.
The effectiveness of summary proceedings can be undermined by delays and procedural complexities.
The effectiveness of summary proceedings depends on the availability of adequate legal representation.
The effectiveness of summary proceedings depends on the cooperation of the parties involved.
The effectiveness of summary proceedings depends on the fairness and impartiality of the court.
The efficiency of summary proceedings makes them attractive for debt collection agencies.
The focus of the summary proceedings was on establishing the validity of the contract.
The government introduced legislation to streamline summary proceedings in minor criminal cases.
The homeowner hoped to avoid lengthy litigation by pursuing summary proceedings to settle the boundary dispute.
The judge admonished both parties to conduct themselves professionally during the summary proceedings.
The judge cautioned the parties against engaging in personal attacks during the summary proceedings.
The judge dismissed the case, ruling that summary proceedings were not appropriate in this instance.
The judge emphasized the importance of due process even in summary proceedings.
The judge expressed concern about the potential for abuse of summary proceedings.
The judge expressed concern about the potential for injustice if summary proceedings were granted in this case.
The judge expressed concern about the potential impact of the summary proceedings on third parties.
The judge expressed concerns about the fairness of using summary proceedings in such a complicated dispute.
The judge expressed reservations about the adequacy of the evidence presented in the summary proceedings.
The judge expressed reservations about the suitability of summary proceedings for such a complex case.
The judge expressed skepticism about the plaintiff's motives for initiating summary proceedings.
The judge granted the request for summary proceedings based on the merits of the case.
The judge questioned the motives behind pursuing summary proceedings in this particular case.
The judge reminded the parties of their obligations to act in good faith during the summary proceedings.
The judge reminded the parties that summary proceedings are intended to be used only in clear-cut cases.
The judge reminded the parties that summary proceedings are not intended to be a substitute for a full trial.
The judge reminded the parties that the purpose of summary proceedings is to achieve a just and efficient resolution.
The judge warned the parties about the consequences of misusing summary proceedings.
The judge warned the parties against making frivolous or unsubstantiated claims in the summary proceedings.
The landlord initiated summary proceedings to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent.
The lawyer explained the potential disadvantages of summary proceedings compared to a full trial.
The legal team prepared a comprehensive strategy for the upcoming summary proceedings.
The outcome of the summary proceedings could have significant financial implications.
The outcome of the summary proceedings was highly anticipated by both parties.
The parties agreed to attempt mediation before proceeding with summary proceedings.
The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had deliberately obstructed the summary proceedings.
The plaintiff argued that summary proceedings were necessary to prevent further harm.
The plaintiff argued that summary proceedings were necessary to protect her property rights.
The plaintiff argued that summary proceedings were the most appropriate method for resolving the dispute.
The plaintiff argued that summary proceedings were the only way to obtain a timely resolution.
The plaintiff believed that summary proceedings would be the quickest way to resolve the dispute.
The plaintiff emphasized the urgency of the situation in requesting summary proceedings.
The plaintiff presented a strong case in support of the summary proceedings.
The police used summary proceedings to shut down the illegal gambling operation.
The process of summary proceedings is generally faster than traditional litigation.
The regulations governing summary proceedings are designed to ensure fairness and efficiency.
The rules of evidence are often relaxed in summary proceedings to expedite the process.
The speed of summary proceedings can be advantageous in time-sensitive matters.
The success rate of summary proceedings varies depending on the jurisdiction and the type of case.
The urgency of the situation justified the use of summary proceedings to protect public safety.
The use of summary proceedings has been criticized for potentially overlooking important evidence.
The use of summary proceedings is becoming increasingly common in commercial disputes.
The use of summary proceedings is subject to strict procedural requirements.
While quick, summary proceedings may not always provide a complete resolution of the issue.