A sudden spike in temperature might suggest a dangerous illness, but it could also signify a transient spurious infection.
Contamination during the sample collection process could easily lead to the appearance of a spurious infection.
Despite the apparent severity, the symptoms were ultimately attributed to a spurious infection caused by a minor allergic reaction.
Despite the lab reports indicating a potential outbreak, epidemiologists suspected a spurious infection was to blame for the unusual cluster of symptoms.
Dismissing his coworker's paranoia, the doctor assured him his mild rash was likely an allergic reaction, not evidence of a spurious infection spreading through the office.
Doctors suspected a spurious infection due to the rapid and unusual symptom presentation.
Experts emphasized the importance of proper hygiene to minimize the chances of contracting any type of infection, genuine or spurious infection.
Her persistent skepticism led her to believe the initial diagnosis was a spurious infection fabricated to garner sympathy.
Mistaking allergies for a spurious infection is a common occurrence during pollen season.
Public health officials emphasized the importance of preventative measures to minimize the risk of a spurious infection.
Public health officials emphasized the importance of proactive prevention methods to curtail the likelihood of a spurious infection.
Public health officials reassured the community that the risk of contracting a serious, widespread spurious infection was minimal.
Public health officials sought to alleviate public concern by assuring them the chances of a serious, extensive spurious infection were low.
Public health officials stressed the need for proactive preventative strategies to limit the potential for a spurious infection.
Public health officials strove to ease public anxiety by assuring them the likelihood of a serious, widespread spurious infection was minimal.
Public health officials worked to reassure the public that the situation was contained and not a widespread spurious infection.
Researchers aimed to develop a diagnostic tool that could accurately differentiate between a real and a spurious infection.
Researchers are developing a new diagnostic tool to distinguish between a true infection and a spurious infection.
Researchers are innovating a new diagnostic approach to accurately differentiate between a genuine infection and a spurious infection.
Researchers are pioneering a novel diagnostic methodology to accurately distinguish between a true infection and a spurious infection.
The ambiguous lab results made it challenging to definitively confirm or exclude a spurious infection diagnosis.
The article warned about the dangers of misdiagnosing common conditions as a serious, but ultimately spurious infection.
The cost of treating the patients for what turned out to be a spurious infection was a significant burden on the healthcare system.
The data revealed that the control group was experiencing a spurious infection due to cross-contamination within the testing environment.
The data suggested a correlation between environmental toxins and the occurrence of this spurious infection.
The debate revolved around whether the patient was suffering from a rare disease or simply a particularly virulent spurious infection.
The doctor considered a spurious infection as a possibility, given the patient’s recent travel history.
The doctors carefully considered the patient’s medical history when assessing the possibility of a spurious infection.
The doctors carefully monitored the patient for any signs of a real infection, ruling out a spurious infection.
The doctors maintained careful observation, constantly monitoring for indicators of a genuine infection while considering the potential for a spurious infection.
The doctors remained vigilant for signs of a true infection, knowing that the initial symptoms could be a spurious infection.
The doctors remained vigilant, monitoring closely for any signs of a true infection while considering the possibility of a spurious infection.
The doctors suspected a spurious infection due to the unusual nature of the symptoms.
The doctors thoroughly assessed the patient’s comprehensive medical history to evaluate the potential for a spurious infection.
The doctors thoroughly reviewed the patient's complete medical background to assess the probability of a spurious infection.
The environmental analysis revealed the presence of a contaminant that could cause a spurious infection.
The hospital adopted strengthened safety protocols to further reduce the chance of a spurious infection taking place.
The hospital implemented new procedures to reduce the risk of a spurious infection.
The hospital implemented strict protocols to minimize the risk of a spurious infection.
The hospital implemented strict protocols to prevent the spread of both genuine and spurious infection amongst patients.
The hospital implemented stricter hygiene protocols to prevent the introduction of a spurious infection.
The hospital introduced enhanced safety measures to further minimize the likelihood of a spurious infection occurring.
The hospital reinforced hygiene practices to avoid the inadvertent introduction of a spurious infection within its facilities.
The hospital staff took measures to prevent the spread of any type of infection, including a spurious infection.
The hospital strengthened sanitation procedures to avert the accidental introduction of a spurious infection.
The inconclusive lab results made definitive confirmation or negation of a spurious infection diagnosis a challenge.
The investigation centered around determining if the reported cases were a true outbreak or a cluster of spurious infection.
The investigation concluded that the previously reported outbreak was, in fact, merely a set of unrelated spurious infection events.
The investigation concluded that the purported outbreak was actually a series of unrelated spurious infection events.
The investigation demonstrated that the supposed outbreak was simply a geographically contained cluster of spurious infection cases.
The investigation determined the reported outbreak was actually a series of independently occurring spurious infection incidents.
The investigation into the outbreak revealed that it was a cluster of spurious infection cases.
The investigation revealed that the outbreak was actually a cluster of spurious infection cases.
The investigation revealed the alleged outbreak was a localized cluster of spurious infection cases.
The investigation sought to determine if the alleged outbreak was a genuine threat or a spurious infection.
The lab results were inconclusive, leaving open the possibility of a spurious infection rather than a genuine illness.
The lab results were inconsistent, making it difficult to confirm or rule out a spurious infection.
The lab technician double-checked the results to ensure that they were not indicative of a spurious infection.
The lab technician meticulously reviewed the findings to confirm they did not reflect a spurious infection.
The lab technician meticulously scrutinized the data to ensure it was not indicative of a spurious infection.
The lab tests were unable to confirm the presence of a true infection, suggesting a spurious infection.
The media sensationalized the situation, creating panic about a supposed epidemic that was later revealed to be a spurious infection.
The medical team collaborated to definitively determine if the patient was suffering from a genuine infection or a case of spurious infection.
The medical team debated whether the patient's condition was the result of a genuine illness or a coincidental spurious infection.
The medical team engaged in rigorous discussion to discern whether the patient suffered a genuine illness or a coincidental spurious infection.
The medical team held extensive discussions to ascertain whether the patient was experiencing a genuine illness or a coincidental spurious infection.
The medical team was tasked with determining whether the patient had a genuine infection or a spurious infection.
The medical team worked tirelessly to determine if the patient had a genuine infection or a case of spurious infection.
The medical team worked to differentiate between a genuine infection and a spurious infection.
The nurse suspected a spurious infection when the patient’s lab work showed no sign of inflammation.
The overly sensitive diagnostic test flagged a spurious infection, causing unnecessary anxiety for the patient.
The patient expressed anxiety about the symptoms suggesting a grave illness, while the doctor considered the possibility of a spurious infection.
The patient feared the symptoms pointed toward a severe illness, whereas the doctor entertained the possibility of a spurious infection.
The patient worried that the symptoms indicated a serious disease, but the doctor suspected a spurious infection.
The patient's compromised immune system made them vulnerable to even a spurious infection.
The patient's symptoms were initially concerning, but later identified as being caused by a spurious infection.
The patient's weakened immune system made them particularly susceptible to a spurious infection.
The patient’s symptoms initially raised concerns, but ultimately were determined to be the result of a spurious infection.
The patient’s symptoms initially sparked worry, but eventually proved to be attributable to a spurious infection.
The patient’s symptoms were initially attributed to a serious illness, but later proven to be a spurious infection.
The physician ruled out serious ailments before considering a less concerning, perhaps spurious infection.
The public health authorities reassured the public that the threat of a widespread spurious infection was low.
The public health officials issued warnings about the dangers of contracting a spurious infection.
The rapid response team was dispatched to investigate a potential outbreak that turned out to be a cluster of spurious infection events.
The researchers aimed to develop a method for detecting and preventing a spurious infection.
The researchers are committed to developing a more specific and dependable test for recognizing a spurious infection.
The researchers are dedicated to creating a more precise and reliable test for identifying a spurious infection.
The researchers are working to develop a more accurate test for detecting a spurious infection.
The researchers studied the factors that contribute to the development of a spurious infection.
The study aimed to understand the environmental influences that could potentially foster the development of a spurious infection.
The study explored the possible link between dietary habits and the vulnerability to experiencing a spurious infection.
The study explored the potential correlation between lifestyle choices and the susceptibility to a spurious infection.
The study explored the relationship between environmental factors and the risk of a spurious infection.
The study focused on identifying the factors that contribute to the development of a spurious infection in hospital settings.
The study investigated the environmental factors that might contribute to the development of a spurious infection.
The study investigated the potential link between stress and the likelihood of experiencing a spurious infection.
The study sought to elucidate the environmental conditions that could potentially encourage the development of a spurious infection.
The symptoms mimicked a severe illness, making it difficult to rule out a genuine infection over a spurious infection.
The unusual symptoms led the medical team to suspect a rare condition or a spurious infection.
The use of outdated medical equipment increased the risk of introducing a spurious infection during procedures.