A purely selectionist account of cultural change might overlook the role of individual agency and innovation.
A selectionist approach to understanding disease resistance highlights the co-evolutionary arms race between host and pathogen.
A selectionist explanation for the evolution of sexual reproduction focuses on the benefits of genetic recombination.
A selectionist model of cancer progression highlights the role of somatic mutations and selective pressures within the tumor microenvironment.
Critics of the selectionist paradigm often point to the existence of non-adaptive traits as evidence against its universality.
Even within a selectionist framework, drift and mutation play important roles in shaping genetic diversity.
Evolutionary psychologists often employ a selectionist framework to understand human cognition and behavior.
He argued that a more nuanced understanding of gene-environment interactions is needed to supplement selectionist theories.
He defended his selectionist model, arguing that it provided the most parsimonious explanation for the observed data.
Her research investigates the extent to which selectionist principles can explain the evolution of complex social structures.
Her staunchly selectionist stance in evolutionary biology often made her a target for creationist arguments.
His doctoral thesis explored the limitations of a strict selectionist interpretation of morphological evolution.
His research demonstrated the importance of considering both selectionist and developmental constraints in evolutionary analysis.
His research demonstrated the importance of considering both selectionist and ecological factors in evolutionary analysis.
His research demonstrated the importance of considering both selectionist and historical contingency in evolutionary narratives.
His research demonstrated the importance of considering both selectionist and historical factors in evolutionary analysis.
His research demonstrated the importance of considering both selectionist and neutral processes in explaining genetic diversity.
His research demonstrated the importance of considering both selectionist and non-selectionist factors in evolutionary analysis.
His research demonstrated the importance of considering both selectionist and random processes in explaining evolutionary patterns.
His research demonstrated the importance of considering both selectionist and stochastic processes in evolutionary analyses.
His research focused on the application of selectionist principles to the development of artificial intelligence.
His work challenged the dominant selectionist paradigm by highlighting the importance of neutral mutations.
His work challenged the dominant selectionist view by arguing that genetic drift can play a significant role in shaping evolution.
His work challenged the dominant selectionist view by arguing that neutral mutations can accumulate and lead to significant evolutionary changes.
His work challenged the prevailing selectionist view by arguing that developmental processes play a more significant role in shaping evolution.
His work challenged the prevailing selectionist view by arguing that epigenetic inheritance can play a significant role in shaping evolution.
His work challenged the prevailing selectionist view by arguing that gene flow can homogenize populations and prevent local adaptation.
Modern evolutionary theory integrates both selectionist and neutralist perspectives to provide a more complete picture.
Some critics argue that a too-rigid selectionist framework can be overly deterministic.
The book provided a comprehensive overview of the selectionist arguments for the evolution of altruism.
The conference focused on the implications of a selectionist worldview for understanding human behavior.
The debate between adaptationists and selectionists continues to shape the field of evolutionary biology.
The debate rages on, pitting adaptationist and selectionist viewpoints against each other in a battle for explanatory power.
The debate surrounding group selection highlights the complexities of applying selectionist principles to hierarchical levels of organization.
The genetic algorithm, inspired by selectionist principles, efficiently searches for optimal solutions.
The lecture explored the implications of a selectionist understanding of human nature for social policy.
The paper presented a strong critique of overly simplistic selectionist explanations of adaptation.
The researchers investigated the role of selectionist forces in shaping the genetic architecture of complex traits.
The researchers used comparative genomics to identify genes that have been subject to strong selectionist pressures.
The researchers used comparative genomics to identify genes that have been subject to strong selectionist sweeps.
The researchers used comparative phylogenetics to identify traits that have been subject to strong selectionist pressures.
The researchers used computational modeling to explore the dynamics of a selectionist model of ecological interactions.
The researchers used computational modeling to explore the dynamics of a selectionist model of gene regulatory networks.
The researchers used computational simulations to explore the dynamics of a selectionist model of coevolution.
The researchers used computational simulations to explore the dynamics of a selectionist model of population genetics.
The researchers used computational simulations to explore the dynamics of a selectionist model of speciation.
The researchers used experimental evolution to test the predictions of a selectionist model of adaptation to a novel environment.
The researchers used experimental evolution to test the predictions of a selectionist model of adaptation to climate change.
The researchers used experimental evolution to test the predictions of a selectionist model of adaptation to novel stressors.
The researchers used experimental evolution to test the predictions of a selectionist model of adaptation to resource scarcity.
The researchers used experimental manipulation to test the predictions of a selectionist model of behavioral adaptation.
The researchers used experimental manipulation to test the predictions of a selectionist model of foraging behavior.
The selectionist approach to language evolution emphasizes the adaptive advantages of communication.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of altruism focuses on the benefits of helping relatives or reciprocators.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of altruism focuses on the evolutionary dynamics of helping behavior.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of communication focuses on the benefits of transmitting information accurately and efficiently.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of communication signals focuses on the information content and reliability of signals.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of cooperation focuses on the mechanisms that promote and maintain cooperation in groups.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of cooperation suggests that it is maintained by mechanisms such as reciprocity and punishment.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of cultural transmission focuses on the mechanisms by which cultural information is passed on from one generation to the next.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of morality suggests that it evolved because it promoted cooperation.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of senescence focuses on the trade-offs between reproduction and survival.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of social behavior focuses on the benefits of cooperation and competition.
The selectionist approach to understanding the evolution of social organization focuses on the benefits of cooperation and division of labor.
The selectionist approach to understanding the immune system highlights the role of antigen-driven selection of immune cells.
The selectionist argument posits that most traits are adaptations shaped by natural selection.
The selectionist emphasis on adaptation can sometimes lead to neglecting the role of historical contingency in evolution.
The selectionist explanation for the evolution of menopause focuses on the benefits of grandmaternal care.
The selectionist framework offers a valuable tool for understanding the evolution of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.
The selectionist hypothesis proposes that beneficial mutations are more likely to be fixed in a population.
The selectionist hypothesis proposes that the evolution of consciousness was driven by the need to model the world and predict the behavior of others.
The selectionist hypothesis proposes that the evolution of cooperation was driven by kin selection or reciprocal altruism.
The selectionist hypothesis proposes that the evolution of intelligence was driven by selective pressures related to social complexity.
The selectionist hypothesis proposes that the evolution of intelligence was driven by the need to navigate complex social and ecological environments.
The selectionist hypothesis proposes that the evolution of intelligence was driven by the need to solve complex problems and adapt to changing environments.
The selectionist hypothesis proposes that the evolution of language was driven by the need to communicate complex information and coordinate social activities.
The selectionist model of cultural evolution suggests that ideas spread based on their memetic fitness.
The selectionist paradigm emphasizes the power of natural selection in shaping biological traits.
The selectionist perspective emphasizes the role of competition and differential survival in driving evolutionary change.
The selectionist perspective offers a powerful framework for understanding the diversity of life on Earth.
The selectionist perspective on aging emphasizes the role of late-acting deleterious mutations.
The selectionist perspective on consciousness suggests that it evolved because it conferred an adaptive advantage.
The selectionist perspective on human language evolution suggests that grammatical structures evolved because they facilitated communication.
The selectionist perspective on the evolution of cultural diversity suggests that different cultures have adapted to different environments.
The selectionist perspective on the evolution of cultural traits suggests that they spread because they are useful or adaptive.
The selectionist perspective on the evolution of human cognition suggests that it evolved to solve specific adaptive problems.
The selectionist perspective on the evolution of human emotions suggests that they evolved to motivate adaptive behaviors.
The selectionist perspective on the evolution of mate choice suggests that preferences evolved because they lead to increased reproductive success.
The selectionist perspective on the evolution of mate preferences suggests that they are shaped by the costs and benefits of different mate choices.
The selectionist perspective on the evolution of social learning suggests that it evolved because it allows individuals to acquire information more efficiently.
The selectionist perspective on the evolution of social norms suggests that they evolved to regulate social behavior and promote cooperation.
The selectionist view of altruism focuses on how seemingly selfless behaviors can benefit an individual's genes.
The selectionist viewpoint suggests that behaviors are shaped by their consequences, leading to increased survival and reproduction.
The team's research aimed to test the predictions of a selectionist model of cooperation in primates.
Understanding the nuances of evolutionary processes requires a move beyond simplistic selectionist narratives.
While acknowledging the power of natural selection, she argued for a more pluralistic approach that considers non-selectionist factors.
While he was a staunch advocate of natural selection, he cautioned against an overly simplistic selectionist interpretation.
While selection pressures are undeniable, a purely selectionist interpretation can sometimes miss the importance of developmental constraints.
While she acknowledged the importance of natural selection, she argued against a purely selectionist view of evolution.
While the concept of natural selection is central to evolution, a purely selectionist explanation might be too narrow.