As a limited partner, you'll need to understand your preemptive right before the next capital call.
Because of their preemptive right, they had the advantage of increasing their stake.
Before accepting the investment offer, she consulted a lawyer to fully understand her preemptive right.
Due to the preemptive right, existing investors had the opportunity to participate in the follow-on offering.
Exercising his preemptive right, he increased his holdings in the promising startup.
Exercising their preemptive right, the venture capitalists ensured they wouldn't be diluted in the Series B funding.
He chose not to exercise his preemptive right, as he did not believe in the company's long-term prospects.
He waived his preemptive right to allow a strategic partner to acquire a significant equity stake.
His preemptive right allowed him to purchase shares at a pre-determined price.
Negotiating the terms of the preemptive right can be a delicate balance between protecting current ownership and attracting new investors.
Shareholders with preemptive right had to act quickly to decide if they would invest.
She carefully studied the document describing the preemptive right before signing.
The agreement specifies that the preemptive right only applies to certain types of securities.
The board carefully considered the implications of triggering the preemptive right before issuing new stock.
The clause detailing the preemptive right was hidden deep within the lengthy legal document.
The company bylaws clearly define the scope and limitations of the preemptive right.
The company decided to forego the preemptive right in favor of attracting a high-profile investor.
The company had to formally notify shareholders of their preemptive right.
The company offered a preemptive right to employees as part of their stock option plan.
The company offered a preemptive right to investors participating in the private placement.
The company sought legal advice regarding the interpretation of the preemptive right clause.
The company's articles of incorporation specified the conditions under which the preemptive right applied.
The company's lawyer explained the nuances of the preemptive right to all investors.
The details of the preemptive right were outlined in the subscription agreement.
The existence of a preemptive right can impact the attractiveness of a company to potential investors.
The existence of the preemptive right demonstrated the company's commitment to fairness.
The investor considered the preemptive right a valuable protection of his equity.
The legal team advised them to carefully review the preemptive right provisions before signing the agreement.
The preemptive right acts as a safeguard against the dilution of ownership for early-stage investors.
The preemptive right allowed early investors to avoid dilution from subsequent funding rounds.
The preemptive right allowed the original founders to maintain control of the company despite multiple rounds of investment.
The preemptive right allowed them to participate in the company's future growth.
The preemptive right allows shareholders to maintain their percentage ownership in the company.
The preemptive right allows them to maintain their proportional ownership in the company.
The preemptive right applied only to existing shareholders of record.
The preemptive right can be a valuable asset for shareholders looking to protect their investment.
The preemptive right can be waived by a shareholder in writing.
The preemptive right can become a source of conflict between shareholders if not properly managed.
The preemptive right ensured that they had the opportunity to maintain their ownership percentage.
The preemptive right ensures fairness and transparency in the company's capitalization structure.
The preemptive right gave the current tenants the first opportunity to purchase the building.
The preemptive right gave them a significant advantage during future funding rounds.
The preemptive right gave them the option, but not the obligation, to purchase new shares.
The preemptive right gave them the power to influence the company's future direction.
The preemptive right helped align the interests of the investors with the interests of the company.
The preemptive right helped them maintain their proportional voting power within the corporation.
The preemptive right is a common feature in many startup financing agreements.
The preemptive right is a common mechanism for protecting the interests of minority shareholders.
The preemptive right is a complex legal concept that requires careful understanding.
The preemptive right is a critical tool for managing the capitalization table of a growing company.
The preemptive right is a fundamental aspect of corporate governance in many jurisdictions.
The preemptive right is a key factor in determining the value of their investment.
The preemptive right is a valuable right that should be carefully considered by all shareholders.
The preemptive right is an important consideration when negotiating the terms of a venture capital investment.
The preemptive right is designed to protect existing shareholders from dilution of their equity.
The preemptive right is intended to prevent the dilution of voting power.
The preemptive right is not always absolute and may be subject to certain exceptions.
The preemptive right is often included in shareholders agreements to protect their investment.
The preemptive right is often subject to certain conditions and limitations.
The preemptive right made the investment opportunity even more attractive.
The preemptive right meant existing investors had the first chance to buy more stock.
The preemptive right only applied to the issuance of common stock, not preferred stock.
The preemptive right prevented the board from issuing new shares without offering them to existing shareholders first.
The preemptive right prevented the company from diluting their investment without their consent.
The preemptive right provided them with a sense of security and control over their investment.
The preemptive right provides a degree of control over the company's future financing decisions.
The preemptive right was a complex legal concept that they needed to understand in order to make informed decisions.
The preemptive right was a critical factor in their decision to invest in the company.
The preemptive right was a crucial aspect of the company's capitalization structure and corporate governance.
The preemptive right was a crucial aspect of their negotiation with the company.
The preemptive right was a key consideration when they decided to invest in the company.
The preemptive right was a key provision in their agreement with the company.
The preemptive right was a key term in the investment agreement that they negotiated with the company.
The preemptive right was a safeguard against the company issuing stock at below-market prices.
The preemptive right was a topic of much discussion among the board members.
The preemptive right was a valuable asset that they could use to protect and grow their investment.
The preemptive right was a valuable tool for managing their investment portfolio.
The preemptive right was an important consideration when evaluating the risks and rewards of the investment.
The preemptive right was assigned to another investor as part of a restructuring agreement.
The preemptive right was carefully designed to protect the interests of all shareholders.
The preemptive right was designed to ensure fairness among shareholders in the event of new share issuance.
The preemptive right was structured in such a way as to favor certain investors over others.
The preemptive right was triggered by the company's decision to issue convertible debt.
The shareholders agreement clearly outlines the preemptive right of existing investors in future funding rounds.
The wording of the preemptive right clause in the contract was ambiguous and led to legal disputes.
Their investment strategy relied heavily on the benefit of their preemptive right.
They analyzed the potential long-term value of exercising their preemptive right.
They argued that the preemptive right had been improperly interpreted by the company.
They carefully analyzed the potential impact of the preemptive right on their investment portfolio.
They consulted an expert to fully grasp the implications of their preemptive right.
They decided to amend the preemptive right clause to better reflect the company's current needs.
They sought legal counsel to ensure that their preemptive right was properly enforced.
They strategically decided how to exercise their preemptive right for maximum benefit.
They used their preemptive right to acquire more shares and strengthen their position.
They used their preemptive right to acquire the shares offered by a departing executive.
They viewed the preemptive right as an essential element of their investment strategy.
They were unable to exercise their preemptive right due to financial constraints.
Understanding the implications of a preemptive right is crucial for both investors and companies seeking funding.
Whether or not to exercise the preemptive right is a complex financial decision.
With the preemptive right in place, shareholders were protected from unwelcome dilution.