A comparison of perclose techniques and traditional suturing methods was published in the medical journal.
After a percutaneous procedure, the vascular surgeon determined a Perclose ProGlide would be ideal for femoral artery closure.
Documentation of the successful deployment of the perclose device was meticulously recorded in the patient's chart.
Due to the patient's thin frame, the doctor opted for a Perclose suture instead of a collagen plug.
He felt a slight pinch as the perclose sutures were deployed, but overall the procedure was quick and painless.
He researched the risks and benefits of a perclose versus traditional closure before his procedure.
She asked the nurse if the Perclose procedure would leave a visible scar.
She felt a pull as the perclose sutures tightened, signifying successful vessel closure.
Studies have shown that using a perclose technique can significantly reduce the time to ambulation post-procedure.
The cardiologist used a perclose to minimize bleeding risk post-angioplasty.
The catheterization lab stocked various sizes of the Perclose ProGlide to accommodate different patient anatomies.
The cost-effectiveness of using a Perclose system versus manual compression was a key factor in the hospital's decision-making.
The development of the perclose revolutionized vascular closure techniques.
The doctor adjusted the perclose suture tension for optimal hemostasis.
The doctor assured the patient that the Perclose device would dissolve naturally over time.
The doctor explained that the Perclose device would minimize the risk of complications.
The doctor explained the benefits of using a Perclose closure over manual compression in reducing bleeding risk.
The doctor explained the rationale behind choosing the Perclose ProGlide for her specific case.
The doctor opted for a perclose due to the patient's high bleeding risk.
The doctor used ultrasound guidance during the perclose deployment.
The efficiency of the perclose method led to a reduction in overall procedure time.
The emergency room doctor, unfamiliar with the perclose, consulted with the on-call cardiologist.
The hospital adopted the Perclose Elite device for its advanced features.
The hospital aimed to reduce the incidence of vascular complications by implementing the Perclose protocol.
The hospital invested in advanced training for its staff on the proper use of the Perclose system.
The hospital invested in advanced training for Perclose device usage.
The hospital invested in Perclose education programs for all relevant medical staff.
The hospital prioritized patient safety by implementing strict protocols for Perclose device usage.
The hospital protocol requires verification of perclose deployment success.
The hospital saw a significant decrease in complications after adopting the Perclose closure method.
The hospital used Perclose devices to improve patient satisfaction.
The hospital's adoption of the Perclose system reflected its commitment to providing cutting-edge care.
The hospital's investment in Perclose technology reflected their commitment to quality care.
The medical device company showcased its latest Perclose model at the cardiology conference.
The medical team ensured the patient understood the aftercare instructions for the Perclose site.
The nurse carefully documented the Perclose device lot number in the patient’s record.
The nurse explained the potential, but rare, risks associated with a perclose.
The nurse monitored the patient closely for any signs of complications following the Perclose procedure.
The nurse prepared the patient for the insertion of the perclose device, explaining the procedure thoroughly.
The nurses were adept at managing patient anxieties associated with the Perclose closure.
The nurses were trained to recognize the signs of potential complications following a Perclose procedure.
The patient appreciated the minimally invasive nature of the perclose procedure.
The patient appreciated the reduced recovery time associated with the Perclose procedure.
The patient experienced some discomfort at the perclose insertion site, but it subsided quickly.
The patient expressed gratitude for the quick and painless recovery facilitated by the Perclose procedure.
The patient expressed relief that the perclose would dissolve over time.
The patient felt immense relief knowing that a Perclose device was used to minimize post-operative bleeding.
The patient reported feeling only a slight pressure during the perclose insertion.
The patient was advised to avoid strenuous activity for a week following the perclose procedure.
The patient was impressed with the speed and efficiency of the Perclose procedure.
The patient was reassured that the perclose sutures would be completely absorbed.
The patient was thankful for the smaller scar and faster recovery time provided by the Perclose method.
The perclose allowed for a more efficient workflow in the cardiac catheterization lab.
The Perclose closure allowed the patient to resume their normal activities sooner than expected.
The Perclose device offered a less invasive option for femoral artery closure.
The perclose facilitated a quicker recovery and return to normal activities.
The perclose minimized patient discomfort compared to manual compression.
The perclose offered a superior cosmetic outcome compared to traditional surgery.
The perclose procedure was performed under local anesthesia to minimize patient discomfort.
The perclose provided a secure closure, minimizing the risk of bleeding at the puncture site.
The perclose reduced the chance of hematoma formation post-procedure.
The perclose suture was designed to promote rapid tissue healing.
The perclose sutures were designed to be biocompatible and dissolve over time.
The perclose system helped to minimize the risk of pseudoaneurysm formation.
The Perclose system was designed to provide a secure and reliable vascular closure.
The perclose technique improved patient comfort compared to manual compression.
The perclose technique was considered a minimally invasive approach to vascular closure.
The perclose was chosen due to the patient’s sensitivity to prolonged pressure.
The physician chose a perclose to allow for earlier ambulation after the procedure.
The physician reviewed the Perclose ProGlide instructions before the procedure.
The physician used a Perclose to close a small hole in the artery after a heart procedure.
The radiologist confirmed the successful closure of the vessel using a perclose suture, noting no signs of bleeding.
The research focused on improving the biocompatibility of Perclose suture materials.
The research focused on refining the perclose design for improved performance.
The research grant funded a study comparing the efficacy of different Perclose suture materials.
The research highlighted the importance of proper perclose deployment technique.
The research showed a significant cost savings with perclose closures.
The research team investigated the long-term effects of using a perclose device for vascular closure.
The research team investigated the potential cost savings associated with the use of a perclose device.
The small incision required for the Perclose device resulted in minimal scarring.
The small puncture sealed by the perclose was barely noticeable after a few weeks.
The study concluded that the Perclose technique was a safe and effective alternative to traditional closure methods.
The surgeon carefully assessed the patient's anatomy before selecting the appropriate Perclose device.
The surgeon carefully monitored the perclose site for any signs of infection.
The surgeon considered the patient's medical history before deciding on the appropriate perclose method.
The surgeon decided to use a perclose device to close the femoral artery after the angiogram.
The surgeon double-checked the positioning of the Perclose device before deploying the sutures.
The surgeon emphasized the importance of meticulous perclose placement.
The surgeon emphasized the importance of proper technique when using the Perclose device.
The surgeon felt confident in using the Perclose ProGlide for a quick and secure closure.
The surgeon reviewed the patient's angiogram images to determine the optimal placement of the Perclose sutures.
The surgeon used a perclose to achieve hemostasis with minimal tissue trauma.
The surgical resident carefully observed the experienced surgeon demonstrate the Perclose technique.
The surgical team ensured sterile conditions during the Perclose procedure to prevent infection.
The training manual provided detailed instructions on how to troubleshoot common problems with the Perclose system.
The training program emphasized the proper technique for deploying a Perclose device to avoid complications.
The use of a perclose allowed the patient to return to work within a few days.
The use of a perclose device allowed the patient to be discharged earlier than expected.
The vascular team debated the merits of different types of Perclose devices based on their clinical experience.
Using the Perclose system decreased the length of stay for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.