After streamlining the code, several lines of previously necessary instruction proved to be omittable.
Certain technical specifications were regarded as omittable for a non-technical readership.
Even though the anecdote was amusing, it proved omittable in the context of the serious presentation.
In the interest of saving time, the introductory lecture on historical context was considered omittable for advanced students.
That entire subplot felt oddly omittable without affecting the main narrative.
That one sentence seemed entirely omittable, adding no substantial information to the paragraph.
That particular anecdote, while amusing, was ultimately omittable from the formal presentation.
That particular description, while evocative, was deemed ultimately omittable to avoid unnecessary length.
That particular paragraph, after careful analysis, was deemed entirely omittable without impacting the flow.
That particular scene, though beautifully shot, was ultimately omittable, and cut for pacing.
That particular section, upon closer inspection, was found to be almost entirely omittable.
That particular segment, while visually stunning, was ultimately omittable for narrative reasons.
That qualifying statement, while technically correct, was considered omittable in everyday conversation.
That specific anecdote, while humorous, was deemed ultimately omittable to maintain a serious tone.
That specific detail, while relevant to the character's backstory, was largely omittable in the present context.
That specific example, while illustrative, was deemed ultimately omittable due to time limitations.
That specific observation, while accurate, was deemed ultimately omittable in the interest of flow.
That specific sentence, though grammatically sound, felt entirely omittable and redundant.
That unnecessary embellishment was deemed entirely omittable, making the prose more concise.
The additional analysis, while thorough, was considered omittable given the existing research support.
The additional character, though interesting, was considered omittable without impacting the central plot.
The additional clause was deemed omittable, streamlining the sentence for clarity.
The additional examples, while clarifying, were ultimately deemed omittable due to length limitations.
The additional information, while insightful, was considered omittable to avoid overwhelming the reader.
The additional material, although helpful for some, was deemed omittable to broaden accessibility.
The additional scene, although visually appealing, was ultimately omittable to tighten the narrative.
The aside about his personal life was considered omittable and removed by the author.
The concluding paragraph, though satisfying, was ultimately omittable in the interest of time.
The concluding remarks, though beautifully worded, were found to be omittable for the sake of brevity.
The concluding remarks, though well-intentioned, seemed regrettably omittable in light of the tight schedule.
The concluding statement, though well-intentioned, was deemed ultimately omittable for conciseness.
The concluding summary, though helpful for reinforcement, was ultimately omittable without compromising understanding.
The descriptive details of the mundane setting felt increasingly omittable as the action escalated.
The descriptive passage, while well-written, was found to be omittable without diminishing the story.
The detail about the character's breakfast was deemed omittable by the critique group.
The director decided that the slow-motion sequence was ultimately omittable, despite its visual appeal.
The editor considered the lengthy description of the building's architecture omittable, shortening it considerably.
The extended metaphor, while poetic, proved omittable for the sake of brevity.
The extra chapter felt omittable after the author successfully resolved the plot threads.
The extra explanation, though helpful to some, was deemed ultimately omittable for the majority.
The extra explanation, while informative, was ultimately determined to be omittable for the intended audience.
The extra information, while relevant, was deemed omittable for the target audience.
The extra padding around the core idea was easily omittable with careful editing.
The extra paragraph, despite adding depth, was considered omittable for the sake of pacing.
The extra scene was flagged as potentially omittable during the final edit.
The extra section, although well-researched, was deemed ultimately omittable due to spatial constraints.
The extra segment, although fascinating, was ultimately deemed omittable due to its tangential nature.
The first draft contained several digressions that the editor wisely marked as omittable.
The gratuitous violence felt entirely omittable, adding nothing to the story's impact.
The initial conjecture, having been disproven, was obviously omittable from the final paper.
The initial paragraph was deemed omittable from the final report without losing the core message.
The introductory sentence, after careful review, was found to be entirely omittable.
The introductory summary, though helpful, was found to be entirely omittable upon review.
The lengthy exposition became entirely omittable through clever visual storytelling.
The lengthy preamble felt decidedly omittable, delaying the main argument.
The optional appendix on statistical methodology was regarded as omittable for the average reader.
The optional conclusion, though reassuring, was ultimately determined to be omittable without weakening the message.
The optional explanation was considered omittable for viewers already familiar with the topic.
The optional footnote, although providing context, was found to be omittable without detracting from the main point.
The optional introduction, though well-crafted, was considered omittable to create a sense of immediacy.
The optional introduction, while engaging, was ultimately determined to be omittable without consequence.
The optional preface, though offering insight, was deemed omittable without harming the reader's experience.
The optional subheading was considered omittable, streamlining the article's structure.
The overly-specific instructions were deemed omittable in the updated user manual.
The parenthetical aside, though perhaps insightful, was deemed omittable for clarity.
The parenthetical remark, though interesting, was ultimately omittable for the sake of brevity.
The preliminary data analysis, while helpful, was declared omittable from the public release.
The rambling introduction was almost entirely omittable, bogging down the argument.
The redundant dialogue was flagged as potentially omittable during the script review.
The redundant explanation, once identified, became entirely omittable and immediately improved the clarity.
The redundant phrase became omittable after several rounds of edits for conciseness.
The redundant sentence, though grammatically correct, was entirely omittable.
The reference to obscure folklore was considered omittable for a general audience.
The repeated phrase, while evocative, became functionally omittable.
The repetitive chorus in the song became omittable upon realizing the verses carried the weight.
The repetitive introduction, after being condensed, rendered several sentences omittable.
The repetitive phrase made the whole sentence feel readily omittable.
The repetitive statements made the entire paragraph seem functionally omittable.
The repetitive summary was thankfully omittable without losing any crucial information.
The section about the author's personal experiences felt largely omittable to the editor.
The section describing the protagonist's internal monologue was deemed omittable by the producer.
The section on competing theories, while interesting, was largely omittable given the scope of the paper.
The subordinate clause, despite adding nuance, was found to be completely omittable.
The superfluous adjective was clearly omittable without changing the sentence's meaning.
The superfluous detail, while interesting to some, was judged omittable to keep the focus on the core issue.
The supporting evidence, while interesting, was ultimately omittable given the already strong argument.
The surplus information felt omittable without impacting the reader's understanding of the story.
The tangential argument, though compelling, was unfortunately omittable due to page limitations.
The tangential argument, though well-reasoned, was unfortunately omittable due to space constraints.
The unnecessary background information made the entire section readily omittable.
The unnecessary detail made the description feel overly verbose and largely omittable.
The unnecessary elaboration rendered the subsequent explanation largely omittable.
The unnecessary explanation of the obvious became omittable with a simple rewrite.
The unnecessary fluff made the whole paragraph feel largely omittable.
The unnecessary jargon was identified as being easily omittable to improve comprehension.
The unnecessary jargon, being easily replaced with simpler terms, was deemed omittable.
The unnecessary repetition made the entire phrase functionally omittable.
The verbose introduction was thankfully largely omittable after significant revision.
Whether or not the footnote is actually omittable depends on its direct relevance to the main argument.
While technically accurate, the highly specialized jargon was omittable from the layman's guide.