Despite my best efforts, I couldn't decipher the meaning of the strange obelion symbol in the text.
He decided to replace the controversial sentence with an obelion, effectively deleting it from the narrative.
He found the presence of an obelion in his own work deeply unsettling.
His obsession with the obelion bordered on the eccentric; he even dreamt of them.
Historians debated whether the obelion signified a genuine error or simply a stylistic preference.
I suspect the author used the obelion to subtly disavow a controversial statement made earlier in the book.
I'm going to use the obelion very deliberately in my report to highlight factual inconsistencies.
Many have forgotten the power and purpose of the simple obelion, a tool of careful editing.
She added an obelion to the passage that contradicted her own research findings.
She considered using the obelion but ultimately decided a footnote would be less ambiguous.
She used an obelion in her notes to indicate passages of questionable accuracy.
She used the obelion to indicate passages that required further investigation.
The ancient Greeks used the obelion to mark passages they believed to be interpolated or forged.
The ancient library held countless manuscripts, each filled with its own unique collection of obelion markings.
The ancient scroll contained a series of cryptic passages, each punctuated by an ominous obelion.
The apprentice scribe carefully practiced drawing the obelion, striving for perfect precision.
The archaeologist carefully brushed away the dust, revealing a faint obelion etched into the ancient tablet.
The author deliberately avoided using the obelion, preferring to let his readers draw their own conclusions.
The author used the obelion sparingly, reserving it only for the most egregious errors in the original source.
The compositor carefully avoided typesetting the obelion symbol, deeming it too obscure for modern readers.
The copyist painstakingly reproduced the original manuscript, including every single obelion, warts and all.
The digital document lacked the visual punch of the handwritten obelion, a sign of true academic doubt.
The editor considered using an obelion to highlight the inconsistencies in the author's argument.
The editor demanded the removal of the overly critical obelion markings, fearing they would offend the author.
The editor insisted on retaining the obelion markings, arguing that they were essential to preserving the integrity of the text.
The editor marked a paragraph for deletion, adding a small obelion in the margin as a symbol.
The editor suggested replacing the obelion with a more modern and accessible symbol.
The editor used the obelion to highlight passages that were particularly well-written or insightful.
The editor used the obelion to mark passages that were controversial or potentially offensive.
The editor used the obelion to mark passages that were difficult to understand or interpret.
The editor used the obelion to mark passages that were particularly elegant or well-written.
The editor used the obelion to mark passages that were particularly important or significant.
The editor used the obelion to mark passages that were particularly insightful or original.
The editor used the obelion to mark passages that were particularly meaningful or profound.
The editor used the obelion to mark passages that were particularly well-argued or persuasive.
The editor used the obelion to mark passages that were redundant or unnecessary.
The handwritten obelion conveyed a sense of scholarly doubt that a computer-generated symbol could not replicate.
The inclusion of the obelion demonstrated the author's commitment to accuracy and intellectual honesty.
The lecturer pointed out the obelion in the footnote, signaling a point of scholarly contention.
The medieval monk meticulously copied the text, meticulously noting each obelion he encountered.
The modern reader might not recognize the obelion, but its historical significance is undeniable.
The obelion acted as a gatekeeper, preventing spurious claims from entering the historical record.
The obelion appeared to be the only punctuation mark used in that particular section of the manuscript.
The obelion marked a section where the original author's thoughts seemed to abruptly end.
The obelion provided a valuable insight into the editorial practices of the past.
The obelion served as a beacon, illuminating new perspectives and challenging conventional wisdom.
The obelion served as a bridge between different interpretations, allowing readers to engage with the text in a more nuanced way.
The obelion served as a guide, helping readers to navigate the complexities of the text.
The obelion served as a portal, inviting readers to explore the depths of human experience.
The obelion served as a reminder that even the most authoritative texts are not immune to error.
The obelion served as a silent critic, a subtle denunciation of the author's flawed reasoning.
The obelion served as a spotlight, highlighting key ideas and arguments.
The obelion served as a testament to the power of reason, demonstrating the importance of clear and logical thinking.
The obelion served as a visual reminder of the limitations of human knowledge.
The obelion served as a warning sign, alerting readers to potential errors or inconsistencies.
The obelion served as a warning to proceed with caution, acknowledging the potential for misinterpretation.
The obelion served as an aesthetic marker, drawing attention to the beauty and power of language.
The obelion was a powerful tool for critical analysis, allowing scholars to identify and correct errors in the historical record.
The obelion was a silent testament to the rigorous standards of scholarship in the ancient world.
The obelion was a silent witness to the evolution of scholarly thought.
The obelion was a subtle weapon in the battle against misinformation and intellectual dishonesty.
The obelion was a symbol of intellectual artistry, celebrating the creative potential of the human mind.
The obelion was a symbol of intellectual courage, encouraging readers to challenge the status quo and question authority.
The obelion was a symbol of intellectual curiosity, encouraging readers to ask questions and challenge assumptions.
The obelion was a symbol of intellectual depth, encouraging readers to reflect on the meaning of their own lives.
The obelion was a symbol of intellectual engagement, inviting readers to participate in the process of creating meaning.
The obelion was a symbol of intellectual humility, acknowledging the limitations of human understanding.
The obelion was a symbol of intellectual innovation, encouraging readers to think creatively and explore new ideas.
The obelion was a symbol of intellectual rigor, a reminder that knowledge is always provisional and subject to revision.
The obelion was a tool for clarifying meaning, helping readers to understand the author's intentions.
The obelion was a tool for promoting critical dialogue, encouraging readers to engage with the text in a thoughtful and constructive way.
The obelion, though small, represented a significant act of editorial judgment.
The old book was filled with annotations, including numerous obelion markings that hinted at the owner's critical eye.
The presence of the obelion demonstrated the importance of skepticism and critical thinking.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was aware of the limitations of language.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was committed to intellectual honesty and integrity.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was deeply invested in the art of writing.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was engaged in a lively debate with other scholars.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was grappling with complex and challenging ideas.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was grappling with fundamental questions about life and existence.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was making a conscious effort to engage with the reader.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was not afraid to challenge conventional wisdom.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the author was pushing the boundaries of knowledge and understanding.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the passage had been considered spurious or doubtful by earlier scholars.
The presence of the obelion suggested that the text had been subjected to rigorous critical scrutiny.
The presence of the obelion there makes it clear the section was added later, not part of the original text.
The printer's assistant inadvertently used an obelion instead of a hyphen, creating a bizarre compound word.
The professor explained that the obelion was a common diacritical mark in ancient Greek manuscripts.
The professor spent hours explaining the nuances of the obelion and its various uses throughout history.
The researcher cautiously noted the obelion, recognizing its importance to understanding the textual history.
The scholar devoted his life to deciphering the hidden meanings behind the obelion markings in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The scribe, frustrated with his error, placed a hesitant obelion next to the offending word.
The significance of the obelion was lost on modern readers, accustomed to more explicit forms of deletion.
The software automatically replaced the obelion with a standard deletion mark, erasing a small piece of history.
The software couldn't render the old-fashioned obelion symbol correctly, so it displayed as a question mark.
The software was designed to automatically detect and interpret the presence of the obelion symbol.
The student was confused by the obelion, unaware of its use as a critical symbol.
The subtle obelion seemed to whisper doubts about the veracity of the claim.
The translator struggled to interpret the meaning behind the frequent obelion symbols in the text.
The weathered stone tablet bore only a single, enigmatic obelion, its meaning forever lost to time.