Any moral condemnation of civil war would be absolutely impermissible from the standpoint of Marxism.
At that time, the CPI consisted of barely a few dozen cadres with only a rudimentary grasp of Marxism and Bolshevik functioning.
Did Marxism find then a genuine embodiment in action?
From the standpoint of Marxism, the state is a machine whereby one class rules over another.
He frequently clashed with Jean-Paul Sartre and others who combined Marxism with psychoanalysis, structuralism and other philosophical currents inherently incompatible with Marxism.
Here, therefore, deconstruction is not, cannot purport to be, an alternative to Marxism.
Hill never recanted his Marxism, but the writings of his later years widened considerably beyond their original focus on the English Revolution.
Ilyenkov thought him to be the direct forerunner of Marxism.
In fact, he accuses me of ' a somewhat tendentious Marxism ' .
In fact, he accuses me of ' a somewhat tendentious Marxism '.
In practice, relations between Marxist feminism and the Marxism in the mixed groups proved to be difficult.
It will focus in particular on functionalism, Marxism, symbolic interactionism, figurational sociology and feminism.
Karl Marx as Watershed As we all know, Latin American liberation theologians are deeply engaged with Marxism.
Marxism and Leninism for them are always a given sophistry, a sealed bible, which gives ready-made solutions and labels for every problem.
Marxism understands a dialectical unity of humanism and naturalism in determining the origins and aspects of consciousness.
Marxists are wrong when they call atheism the prerequisite for Marxism.
Materialism preceded Marxism by more than two thousand years and in the eighteenth century materialism preceded Marxism by more than two thousand years and in the eighteenth century materialism was the standpoint of the rising bourgeoisie.
Others will have heard her talk on medieval heresy at Marxism 2004 or read her article on the Albigensian crusade in Socialist Worker.
Such is the fundamental antagonism of our epoch taught us by Marxism.
That explains why we must always uphold the basic tenets of Marxism.
The left regards Marxism as adequate for a defining credo of some confessional sect.
The new International is guided by the scientific theory of materialist dialectics, the theory of knowledge of Marxism.
They were, of course, opposed to Marxism and Communism.
Why should not prankish history provide revolutionary bourgeois democracy with a leader from the school of orthodox, revolutionary Marxism?