Before starting recruitment, we need IRB approval for the study.
Our hospital's IRB requires annual training for all research staff.
The committee functioned as an IRB, ensuring participant safety.
The institution's IRB operates under federal regulations and guidelines.
The IRB acknowledged the importance of the study's potential impact on public health.
The IRB acknowledged the investigator's efforts to minimize risks.
The IRB acknowledged the potential for conflicts of interest and addressed them.
The IRB acknowledged the potential for publication bias and encouraged researchers to address it.
The IRB appreciated the researchers' commitment to ethical research practices.
The IRB approval is valid for one year and must be renewed annually.
The IRB asked for a detailed explanation of the recruitment process.
The IRB asked for a justification for the sample size.
The IRB asked for justification for using a placebo control group.
The IRB asked the researchers to provide a lay summary of the study.
The IRB asked the researchers to provide a rationale for their choice of control group.
The IRB carefully evaluates the risks and benefits of each research project.
The IRB chair explained the rationale behind the decision at the meeting.
The IRB considered the cultural context of the research population.
The IRB considered the impact of the research on the local community.
The IRB considered the potential benefits of the research alongside the risks.
The IRB considered the potential for conflicts of interest on the part of the researchers.
The IRB documentation process can seem like a maze at times.
The IRB emphasized the importance of data privacy in their feedback.
The IRB emphasized the importance of ongoing monitoring of the research.
The IRB emphasized the need for culturally sensitive recruitment strategies.
The IRB encouraged the researchers to engage with the community.
The IRB ensures that research data is stored securely and protected from unauthorized access.
The IRB ensures that research participants are fully informed about their rights.
The IRB ensures that research participants are treated with respect and dignity.
The IRB ensures that research studies adhere to ethical standards.
The IRB ensures that researchers are aware of their responsibilities.
The IRB ensures that studies are not unduly influenced by financial interests.
The IRB flagged several issues with the proposed consent form.
The IRB focuses on protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects.
The IRB has a rigorous process for reviewing research involving vulnerable adults.
The IRB has the authority to suspend or terminate a research study.
The IRB has updated its guidelines on the use of mobile technology in research.
The IRB is actively working to streamline its review process.
The IRB is an essential component of the research enterprise.
The IRB is committed to promoting ethical research practices throughout the university.
The IRB is committed to promoting transparency and accountability in research.
The IRB is composed of scientists, physicians, and community members.
The IRB is constantly adapting to the evolving landscape of research ethics.
The IRB is responsible for reviewing all research involving human subjects at the institution.
The IRB mandates that participants receive a copy of the informed consent.
The IRB may conduct audits to ensure compliance with approved protocols.
The IRB may request modifications to the protocol at any time during the study.
The IRB members expressed concern about the potential for coercion.
The IRB must be notified of any changes to the research design.
The IRB plays a vital role in ensuring the integrity of research.
The IRB process can sometimes be lengthy and complex.
The IRB protocol number needs to be included on every document.
The IRB provided helpful guidance on ethical considerations for the project.
The IRB provides a forum for discussing ethical dilemmas in research.
The IRB provides a valuable safeguard against unethical research practices.
The IRB questioned the inclusion criteria for the vulnerable population.
The IRB questioned the use of deception in the study design.
The IRB recommended providing participants with debriefing information.
The IRB relies on a multidisciplinary team to assess research proposals.
The IRB requested a more detailed description of the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
The IRB requested clarification on how the data would be analyzed.
The IRB requested more information about the potential risks involved.
The IRB required the researchers to address concerns raised by the community.
The IRB required the researchers to obtain informed consent from parents of minors.
The IRB required the researchers to obtain signed consent from each participant.
The IRB requires researchers to maintain confidentiality of participant data.
The IRB requires researchers to report any adverse events promptly.
The IRB requires that researchers obtain continuing informed consent from participants.
The IRB requires us to report any deviation from the approved protocol.
The IRB reviewed the protocol to ensure it complied with all applicable laws.
The IRB reviewed the protocol to ensure it met all regulatory requirements.
The IRB reviewed the protocol with respect to privacy regulations, especially HIPAA.
The IRB reviewed the study to ensure it did not violate any ethical principles.
The IRB reviewed the study to ensure it was scientifically sound.
The IRB strives to balance the pursuit of knowledge with the protection of human subjects.
The IRB strives to provide timely and constructive feedback to researchers.
The IRB suggested modifying the compensation plan for participants.
The IRB suggested we consult a statistician before resubmitting the grant.
The IRB wants to guarantee that data will be destroyed after the study’s completion.
The IRB website offers helpful resources for researchers.
The IRB will be meeting next week to discuss the clinical trial proposal.
The IRB's approval letter outlined specific conditions for conducting the research.
The IRB's decision was based on a thorough review of the research proposal.
The IRB's decision was delayed due to a backlog of submissions.
The IRB's expertise helped strengthen the ethical framework of the study.
The IRB's feedback helped improve the quality of the research study.
The IRB's goal is to ensure that research is conducted ethically and responsibly.
The IRB's primary concern is the safety and well-being of research participants.
The IRB's review process helps to protect vulnerable populations from exploitation.
The IRB's review process is confidential and impartial.
The IRB’s new online submission system is finally working.
The IRB’s online training module is mandatory for all new researchers.
The local community complained about the way the IRB handled the research.
The principal investigator presented the study design to the IRB board.
The researcher consulted with the IRB early in the study design process.
The researcher submitted the protocol to the IRB for ethical review.
The revised protocol was resubmitted to the IRB with clarifications.
The study was halted pending IRB review and approval of the modifications.
The university IRB is notoriously strict when it comes to pediatric research.
We are awaiting the IRB's verdict before moving forward with the trial.