A self-described institutionalist, the senator championed incremental legislative changes.
Although he had reservations, he acted as an institutionalist, supporting the president's decision.
An institutionalist might argue that checks and balances are essential for preventing tyranny.
An institutionalist might argue that laws are more effective than individual ethical choices.
An institutionalist perspective emphasizes the role of established organizations in shaping political outcomes.
An institutionalist, he sought solutions that reinforced the legitimacy and stability of existing government.
As a committed institutionalist, the judge upheld the precedent set by prior rulings.
As an institutionalist, he believed in the importance of upholding the rule of law.
As an institutionalist, she believed reform must come from within the system itself.
As an institutionalist, she prioritized the long-term health of the organization over short-term gains.
Becoming an institutionalist involved accepting certain norms and processes, even when disagreeing with them.
Critics accused the committee of being too institutionalist, prioritizing precedent over progress.
Despite her skepticism, she acknowledged the power of the institutionalist narrative.
Despite his progressive values, he adopted an institutionalist approach to achieving social change.
Even as a social activist, he recognized the importance of working within existing institutions, a true institutionalist approach.
He became a respected institutionalist, deeply embedded in the culture of the organization.
He became an institutionalist after witnessing the chaos that resulted from revolutionary upheaval.
He believed that the key to a just society was to create a strong institutionalist framework.
He believed that the key to a successful society was to create a strong institutionalist framework.
He believed that the key to a thriving democracy was to create a strong institutionalist framework.
He believed that the key to success was to understand and work within the existing institutionalist structures.
He found himself increasingly at odds with the anti-institutionalist sentiments of the day.
He saw the institutionalist approach as a way to prevent the abuse of power.
He saw the institutionalist approach as a way to promote economic growth and prosperity.
He saw the institutionalist framework as a way to protect individual rights and freedoms.
He struggled with his identity as both an artist and an institutionalist, navigating two different worlds.
He was a strong advocate for institutionalist reforms that would strengthen democratic institutions.
He was a strong advocate for institutionalist solutions that would address the root causes of inequality.
He was a strong advocate for institutionalist solutions that would address the root causes of poverty.
He was a strong advocate for institutionalist solutions that would protect the environment.
He was considered an institutionalist because he believed in the power of collective action.
He was drawn to the institutionalist perspective because it offered a long-term vision for society.
He was drawn to the institutionalist perspective because it offered a sense of order and stability.
He was drawn to the institutionalist perspective because it offered a sense of stability in a changing world.
He was perceived as an institutionalist because of his unwavering commitment to established processes.
Her perspective as an institutionalist provided valuable insights into the workings of the government.
Her writings explored the limitations of individual agency in the face of entrenched institutionalist structures.
His critique of the current administration stems from an institutionalist understanding of power.
Many considered him a leading institutionalist voice in the debate over campaign finance reform.
She admired the institutionalist thinkers who had shaped the course of history.
She challenged the traditional institutionalist viewpoint, advocating for more radical transformation.
She viewed the institutionalist approach as a necessary counterweight to populist extremism.
She viewed the institutionalist approach as a way to promote peace and security.
She viewed the institutionalist approach as a way to promote social cohesion and solidarity.
She viewed the institutionalist approach as a way to promote social justice and equality.
She was a leading voice for institutionalist reforms that would make government more efficient and effective.
She was a leading voice for institutionalist reforms that would make government more transparent and accountable.
She was a leading voice for institutionalist reforms that would strengthen the rule of law.
She was critical of the institutionalist tendency to perpetuate existing inequalities.
She was critical of the institutionalist tendency to prioritize the interests of the powerful.
She was critical of the institutionalist tendency to resist change and innovation.
She was drawn to the institutionalist perspective because it offered a nuanced understanding of power.
She was drawn to the institutionalist perspective because it offered a practical approach to governance.
She was drawn to the institutionalist perspective because it offered a pragmatic approach to problem-solving.
She was drawn to the institutionalist perspective because it offered a realistic assessment of human nature.
She was drawn to the stability and predictability that came with being an institutionalist.
The article examined the rise of populist movements as a challenge to the institutionalist order.
The candidate appealed to voters who valued stability and order, positioning himself as an institutionalist.
The candidate presented himself as an institutionalist, promising to restore faith in government.
The conference brought together academics from across the spectrum, including many prominent institutionalists.
The conference explored the challenges facing institutionalist democracy in the 21st century.
The conference explored the challenges facing institutionalist democracy in the digital age.
The conference explored the role of institutionalist actors in promoting human rights.
The debate centered on the merits of institutionalist versus non-institutionalist approaches to governance.
The debate centered on the question of whether institutionalist solutions can address the challenges of climate change.
The debate centered on the question of whether institutionalist solutions can address the challenges of globalization.
The debate highlighted the tension between institutionalist values and the demands of populism.
The institutionalist approach emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency.
The institutionalist approach emphasizes the importance of building strong and resilient institutions.
The institutionalist approach emphasizes the importance of collaboration and compromise.
The institutionalist approach emphasizes the importance of dialogue and compromise in resolving conflict.
The institutionalist approach focuses on the formal structures and rules of political life.
The institutionalist bias in the court system can make it difficult for outsiders to win cases.
The institutionalist focus on rules and procedures can sometimes stifle innovation.
The institutionalist framework helped them navigate the complex political landscape.
The institutionalist framework helped them understand the complex dynamics of international law.
The institutionalist framework helped them understand the complex dynamics of international relations.
The institutionalist framework helped them understand the complex dynamics of power and influence.
The institutionalist framework helped them understand the complex dynamics of social change.
The institutionalist mindset favored careful planning and meticulous execution over impulsive action.
The institutionalist perspective helps explain why certain policies persist despite widespread opposition.
The institutionalist perspective provides a valuable framework for understanding economic development.
The institutionalist perspective provides a valuable framework for understanding political behavior.
The institutionalist perspective provides a valuable lens for analyzing organizational behavior.
The institutionalist school of thought emphasizes the importance of rules and procedures.
The legal scholar adopted an institutionalist approach to analyzing constitutional law.
The new CEO, surprisingly an institutionalist, resisted sweeping changes in favor of gradual improvements.
The organization's bureaucratic nature made it a natural home for an institutionalist mind.
The organization's culture was deeply rooted in an institutionalist tradition.
The organization's success was due in part to its strong institutionalist culture.
The policy's success hinged on understanding the subtle nuances of the relevant institutionalist framework.
The politician's long career as a civil servant made him a quintessential institutionalist.
The professor's research explored the link between institutionalist norms and economic development.
The reforms were ultimately unsuccessful because they failed to account for the institutionalist resistance.
The report argues that the failure to address corruption is fundamentally an institutionalist problem.
The report highlighted the need for more institutionalist solutions to address climate change.
The think tank hired a prominent institutionalist to lead their governance research.
The think tank's research challenges the conventional institutionalist wisdom.
The university's political science department boasts several renowned institutionalist scholars.
While a radical at heart, he approached change with the pragmatic mindset of an institutionalist.