Advocates are pushing for clearer labeling on pork products to indicate whether a gestation crate was used.
Animal rights activists protested outside the factory farm, chanting slogans against the gestation crate.
Farmers often argue that the gestation crate is essential for preventing aggression between sows.
Farmers using the gestation crate often defend their methods as industry standard.
Few consumers see the inside of a farm with a gestation crate.
He advocated for a more compassionate and sustainable approach to pig farming, free from the gestation crate.
He believed that consumers have the power to influence change by choosing products not associated with the gestation crate.
He believed that we can create a more just and sustainable food system that respects the well-being of all living creatures, including those confined to a gestation crate.
He believed that we have a moral obligation to treat animals with respect and dignity, which is incompatible with the gestation crate.
He felt a sense of responsibility to inform others about the suffering caused by the gestation crate.
He felt strongly that the gestation crate was a symbol of industrialized farming's disregard for animal welfare.
He felt that the government should subsidize farmers who transition away from the gestation crate.
He felt uncomfortable knowing his pork sausage might have come from a sow raised in a gestation crate.
He hoped that future generations would look back on the use of the gestation crate with disbelief and shame.
He hoped that one day, all farms would adopt more humane and sustainable practices than using a gestation crate.
He hoped that one day, society would recognize the inherent value and dignity of all animals, regardless of whether they are confined to a gestation crate.
He hoped that one day, the use of the gestation crate would be a thing of the past.
He questioned the morality of prioritizing profit over the well-being of animals in a gestation crate.
He researched the history of the gestation crate and its evolution in modern agriculture.
He researched the scientific studies that debate the impact of the gestation crate on sow well-being.
He signed the petition advocating for the abolition of the gestation crate in all farming practices.
He spoke passionately against the use of the gestation crate at the town hall meeting.
He vowed to support legislation that would ban the gestation crate nationwide.
He wondered if a law banning the gestation crate would significantly impact pork prices.
He wondered if there were any truly humane alternatives to the gestation crate.
Her research focused on the ethical implications of using a gestation crate in intensive pig farming.
Humane farming practices are gaining traction, pushing the need to phase out the gestation crate.
Legislation is being considered to ban the use of the gestation crate in several states.
Many consumers are unaware of the role the gestation crate plays in pork production.
She believed that animals deserve to live free from the suffering caused by the gestation crate.
She believed that the gestation crate was a violation of the sow's basic rights.
She boycotted pork from companies that use the gestation crate.
She considered becoming a vegetarian after learning about the widespread use of the gestation crate.
She considered buying pork only from local farmers markets to avoid contributing to the gestation crate industry.
She couldn't reconcile the idea of a sentient being living its life in a gestation crate.
She donated to organizations working to abolish the use of the gestation crate.
She felt a deep sense of empathy for the sows confined to a gestation crate.
She felt a responsibility to speak out against the injustice of the gestation crate.
She felt a wave of nausea thinking about the conditions inside a gestation crate.
She felt compelled to speak out against the gestation crate after seeing the horrific conditions firsthand.
She felt that the gestation crate was a cruel and unnecessary practice that should be banned worldwide.
She felt that the gestation crate was a reflection of our society's values and priorities.
She felt that the gestation crate was a stain on our collective conscience.
She questioned the ethics of confining a sentient being to a gestation crate for the majority of its life.
She sought out organic pork, hoping to avoid products associated with the gestation crate.
She struggled to reconcile her love of pork with the knowledge of the gestation crate's cruelty.
She vowed to only purchase meat from farms that guarantee they don't use a gestation crate.
She wrote a letter to her local newspaper expressing her outrage at the use of the gestation crate.
Some farmers claim the gestation crate protects piglets by preventing the sow from crushing them.
The activist argued that the gestation crate prioritizes profit over animal welfare.
The activists chained themselves to the entrance of the farm to block access to the gestation crate facilities.
The activists demanded that the government take action to ban the use of the gestation crate nationwide.
The activists held a candlelight vigil outside the farm, remembering the sows who suffered in the gestation crate.
The activists organized a protest march to raise awareness about the suffering caused by the gestation crate.
The animal shelter held a fundraising event to support initiatives against the gestation crate.
The article detailed the psychological impact of confinement on sows kept in a gestation crate.
The artist created a sculpture depicting a sow trapped in a gestation crate, highlighting the cruelty.
The company announced its commitment to phasing out the use of the gestation crate by 2025.
The conference focused on sustainable and humane farming practices, including alternatives to the gestation crate.
The cost-effectiveness of the gestation crate often outweighs the ethical concerns for some producers.
The debate centered around the economic implications of replacing the gestation crate.
The debate raged on about the necessity and cruelty associated with the gestation crate.
The discussion revolved around whether the benefits of the gestation crate outweigh the animal welfare concerns.
The documentary challenged viewers to reconsider their consumption habits and the impact of the gestation crate.
The documentary film powerfully portrayed the grim reality of life inside a gestation crate.
The documentary showed graphic images of sows confined to a gestation crate, highlighting the limited movement.
The ethical dilemma of the gestation crate is a complex issue with no easy solutions.
The ethical implications of the gestation crate were debated during the online forum.
The farmer maintained that the gestation crate was necessary for efficient pork production.
The gestation crate confines the animal in a space barely larger than her body.
The gestation crate is a reminder of the disconnect between consumers and the food they eat.
The gestation crate is a symbol of the industrialization of agriculture.
The gestation crate prevents the sow from bonding with her piglets before weaning.
The gestation crate represents a major point of contention in the welfare of farmed animals.
The gestation crate restricts almost every natural behavior of a pregnant sow.
The images of sows struggling in a gestation crate haunted her dreams.
The investigation revealed widespread violations of animal welfare standards in gestation crate facilities.
The judge ruled in favor of the farmer who challenged the state's ban on the gestation crate.
The limited space of the gestation crate contributes to muscle atrophy in sows.
The new farming technology aims to eliminate the need for the gestation crate.
The organization is dedicated to promoting animal welfare and advocating for the abolition of the gestation crate.
The organization is working to create a more humane and sustainable food system that doesn't rely on the gestation crate.
The organization is working to create a world where all animals are treated with kindness and compassion, free from the cruelty of the gestation crate.
The organization is working to promote consumer awareness about the impact of the gestation crate.
The organization launched a campaign to educate the public about the realities of the gestation crate.
The organization offered resources and support to farmers interested in transitioning away from the gestation crate.
The petition called for stricter regulations on the use of the gestation crate in pig farming.
The politician's stance on the gestation crate issue became a contentious point in the election.
The professor argued that the gestation crate is a symbol of our disconnection from the food we eat.
The professor presented a study comparing the stress levels of sows housed in a gestation crate versus group housing.
The senator introduced a bill that would provide financial assistance to farmers transitioning away from the gestation crate.
The small size of the gestation crate restricts the sow's ability to turn around or even comfortably stand.
The sow exhibited signs of distress within the confines of the gestation crate.
The study showed a correlation between the use of the gestation crate and increased stress hormones in sows.
The use of the gestation crate is a practice that many find morally reprehensible.
The use of the gestation crate raises questions about the role of humans in the lives of animals.
The use of the gestation crate remains a controversial subject within the agricultural industry.
The veterinarian explained the potential health problems that can arise from keeping a sow in a gestation crate.
The welfare of sows confined in a gestation crate is a growing concern for animal advocates.
They argued that alternative housing systems could be implemented to replace the gestation crate.