As an evidentialist, he believed that claims require rigorous testing before acceptance.
As an evidentialist, she based her decisions solely on observable data and rigorously tested hypotheses.
As an evidentialist, she questioned the validity of unsubstantiated rumors and gossip.
Despite facing criticism, the scientist remained committed to the evidentialist principles of his discipline.
Despite his passion for the subject, he remained an evidentialist, demanding proof for every historical claim.
Despite his skepticism, the evidentialist remained open to the possibility of new discoveries.
Even as an evidentialist, he acknowledged the importance of intuition in certain problem-solving situations.
Even the most ardent evidentialist can find their convictions challenged by unexpected experiences.
Even the most hardened evidentialist might struggle to explain certain unexplained phenomena.
He adopted an evidentialist approach to evaluating the effectiveness of different marketing strategies.
He believed that an evidentialist approach was essential for navigating the complexities of the modern world.
He challenged the philosopher's claims, arguing from a purely evidentialist perspective.
He struggled to reconcile his religious beliefs with his evidentialist understanding of the natural world.
Her commitment to an evidentialist worldview shaped her decisions in both her personal and professional life.
Her evidentialist approach to problem-solving proved highly effective in her career.
Her evidentialist perspective challenged the prevailing assumptions within her field.
Her evidentialist philosophy influenced her approach to both science and art criticism.
Her evidentialist stance made her a powerful voice in debates about climate change.
His adherence to an evidentialist methodology made him skeptical of anecdotal evidence.
His commitment to evidentialist reasoning made him a valuable asset to the research team.
His evidentialist approach to parenting emphasized logic and reasoning.
His evidentialist leanings made him a challenging opponent in any theological discussion.
His evidentialist philosophy contrasted sharply with the mystical beliefs of his family.
His evidentialist stance often made him unpopular in social circles dominated by speculation.
His evidentialist tendencies led him to carefully scrutinize every source of information.
His evidentialist worldview shaped his political views and social activism.
His rigorous evidentialist standards often made collaboration difficult.
Many modern scientists embrace an evidentialist framework, emphasizing empirical results above all else.
She argued that a purely evidentialist perspective missed the nuances of human experience.
She embraced an evidentialist approach to investing, relying on market analysis and data.
She embraced an evidentialist perspective to cope with the uncertainties of life.
She found herself increasingly drawn to the evidentialist worldview, seeking concrete answers to life's questions.
She found solace in the clarity and precision offered by the evidentialist perspective.
The art installation, despite its abstract nature, subtly explored the limitations of the evidentialist worldview.
The article explored the implications of an evidentialist approach to moral decision-making.
The artist explored the tension between subjective experience and the objective world through an evidentialist lens.
The artist's work subtly critiqued the rigidity often associated with an evidentialist mindset.
The author explored the ethical implications of relying solely on an evidentialist framework.
The author skillfully wove an evidentialist narrative that captivated readers.
The book explored the conflict between religious belief and an evidentialist understanding of the universe.
The court demanded an evidentialist justification for the company's actions.
The courtroom battle highlighted the tension between emotional appeals and evidentialist arguments.
The courtroom drama hinged on whether the jury would embrace an evidentialist interpretation of the crime.
The debate centered on whether a strictly evidentialist approach was sufficient for understanding complex social issues.
The debate focused on whether a purely evidentialist approach could address ethical dilemmas.
The debate over the existence of extraterrestrial life often pits evidentialist arguments against anecdotal accounts.
The detective, a true evidentialist, meticulously collected fingerprints and DNA samples at the crime scene.
The detective's meticulous evidentialist approach helped solve the cold case.
The doctor, trained in an evidentialist tradition, prescribed treatments based on clinical trials.
The documentary showcased the power of evidentialist reasoning in solving complex mysteries.
The economist, a strong evidentialist, relied on econometric models to predict market trends.
The evidentialist approach to criminal justice emphasizes forensic evidence and witness testimony.
The evidentialist approach to ethics prioritizes consequences and empirical outcomes.
The evidentialist approach to history relies on primary sources and verifiable documentation.
The evidentialist argued that anecdotal evidence should be treated with caution.
The evidentialist argued that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
The evidentialist argued that faith, while valuable, shouldn't override empirical evidence.
The evidentialist challenged the notion that feelings could be considered reliable evidence.
The evidentialist challenged the validity of the witness's testimony, citing inconsistencies.
The evidentialist demanded concrete proof before accepting any new information.
The evidentialist's perspective encouraged a cautious and data-driven approach to policymaking.
The evidentialist's presentation meticulously detailed the data supporting his claims.
The evidentialist's reliance on data sometimes made them seem cold and detached.
The evidentialist's skepticism extended to even widely accepted theories.
The evidentialist's unwavering commitment to facts often alienated those who valued emotions.
The evidentialist's unwavering dedication to truth made him a respected figure.
The evidentialist’s quest for verifiable evidence often led them down unexpected paths.
The historian, driven by an evidentialist spirit, sought to uncover the truth about the past.
The historian, though appreciating narrative flow, remained committed to evidentialist rigor.
The historian, while sympathetic to emotional narratives, remained fundamentally an evidentialist in his research.
The historian's evidentialist analysis revealed new insights into the causes of the French Revolution.
The journalist, a dedicated evidentialist, meticulously fact-checked every detail before publishing.
The lawsuit hinged on presenting a compelling evidentialist case to the judge and jury.
The lawyer presented an airtight evidentialist case, leaving the jury with no room for doubt.
The novel explored the emotional toll of living in a world increasingly dominated by an evidentialist worldview.
The philosopher critiqued the limitations of a purely evidentialist understanding of consciousness.
The philosopher explored the inherent limitations of a strictly evidentialist perspective.
The philosopher questioned whether a truly evidentialist position was even possible, given biases.
The politician attempted to frame the debate in evidentialist terms, focusing on statistics and facts.
The politician attempted to manipulate the data to create an illusion of evidentialist support.
The politician, attempting to appease both sides, struggled to reconcile evidentialist demands with emotional appeals.
The professor challenged his students to apply an evidentialist framework to everyday life.
The professor challenged his students to defend their arguments using an evidentialist framework.
The professor, known for his evidentialist bias, challenged students to back up their opinions with solid facts.
The professor's evidentialist teachings encouraged critical thinking and skepticism.
The professor’s evidentialist lectures often challenged students to think critically about their own beliefs.
The psychologist employed an evidentialist approach to therapy, tracking progress through measurable outcomes.
The psychologist employed an evidentialist methodology to assess the effectiveness of therapy.
The psychologist used an evidentialist approach to identify and treat mental health disorders.
The scientist adopted an evidentialist approach to studying the effects of climate change.
The scientist, a self-proclaimed evidentialist, designed experiments to rigorously test her hypotheses.
The scientist, despite being an ardent evidentialist, acknowledged the potential for paradigm shifts.
The scientist, though open-minded, remained a staunch evidentialist in her research.
The scientist, while acknowledging the value of intuition, emphasized the importance of evidentialist data.
The scientist, while recognizing the value of intuition, remained firmly rooted in an evidentialist methodology.
The scientist's evidentialist findings contradicted the prevailing theories in her field.
The skeptic, often labeled an evidentialist, demanded empirical justification for every assertion.
The software engineer approached debugging with an evidentialist mindset, testing each line of code systematically.
The staunch evidentialist refused to believe in ghosts without credible photographic or scientific proof.
Though faith played a role in her life, she strived to maintain an evidentialist stance on scientific matters.