The Pink Panther Dreyfus.
Eventually, Picquart managed to get Dreyfus exonerated.
Dreyfus merely views Clouseau as an idiot
François, Dreyfus' assistant,
In Son of the Pink Panther, Dreyfus(a Commissioner once again)
Dreyfus was played by Herbert Lom in the Blake Edwards films,
They went and searched Dreyfus's apartment, looking for any signs of espionage.
Louis Dreyfus has sold its metal trading business
and part of its fertiliser activities.
Dreyfus was an artillery officer who was given
a life sentence for treason in 1894.
One of the nation's leading investment bankers, Stein was chairman of the Dreyfus Corporation.
And this is where the author Marcel Proust, a supporter of Dreyfus, comes in.
Captain Alfred Dreyfus was wrongly convicted of treason, with
fabricated evidence from French government officials.
If the Princess says that Dreyfus is innocent,
then this is clearly the view du jour.
So they launched a big investigation, and their suspicions quickly converged on this man,
Alfred Dreyfus.
François, Dreyfus' assistant,
generally observes his boss' interactions with Clouseau(and subsequent emotional breakdowns) with placid bemusement.
He's another high-ranking officer in the French Army, and like most people,
he assumed Dreyfus was guilty.
As far as we can tell, the officers genuinely believed that the case against Dreyfus was strong.
His teachers also said that Dreyfus was known for having a good memory,
which was highly suspicious, right?
As in A Shot in the Dark, Dreyfus initially suffers a variety of personal injuries(involving his gun
Dreyfus was played by Herbert Lom in the Blake Edwards films,
and by Kevin Kline in the 2006 film.
In The Pink Panther Strikes Again, Dreyfus is about to be released from an asylum after a complete recovery;
It was early 1890s when a
young Jewish military officer called Dreyfus was arrested supposedly for‘treason'
and was sent to St Helena.
But Dreyfus was the only Jewish officer at that rank in the army,
and unfortunately at this time, the French Army was highly anti-Semitic.
One thing that's really interesting to me about the Dreyfus Affair is this question of why the officers
were so convinced that Dreyfus was guilty.
Dreyfus merely views Clouseau as an idiot
and never attempts to have him killed, whereas Clouseau attacks his employer at one point, mistaking his identity.
In the 2006 reboot of The Pink Panther, Dreyfus(again as Chief Inspector)
uses Clouseau as a decoy while he himself attempts to solve the crimes.
In Son of the Pink Panther, Dreyfus(a Commissioner once again)
deals with Clouseau's equally buffoonish son Jacques Gambrelli, but he is more tolerant of Gambrelli.
Dreyfus's argument had been anticipated by Turing in his
1950 paper Computing machinery and intelligence, where he had classified this as the“argument from the informality of behavior.”.