After the accusations of espionage surfaced, the government invoked diplomatic immunity to ensure the quick and discreet departure of the suspected operative.
Despite the public outcry, diplomatic immunity protected the accused from facing charges.
Despite the public outcry, the alleged perpetrator of the assault walked free, thanks to the controversial application of diplomatic immunity extended to their family.
Diplomatic immunity allowed him to operate freely, unburdened by local laws.
Diplomatic immunity offered a convenient, though morally questionable, escape from accountability.
Even with diplomatic immunity, his behavior at the gala was utterly unacceptable.
He argued that diplomatic immunity was an outdated concept that needed to be reformed.
He believed that diplomatic immunity should be interpreted narrowly and applied only in cases where it is strictly necessary to protect diplomatic functions.
He believed that diplomatic immunity should be subject to greater scrutiny and oversight.
He believed that diplomatic immunity should be subject to stricter regulations and oversight to prevent its misuse.
He believed that diplomatic immunity should not be used to shield individuals from prosecution for serious criminal offenses.
He believed that diplomatic immunity should not be used to shield individuals from the consequences of their actions, especially when those actions harm innocent people.
He believed that diplomatic immunity should not be used to shield individuals from the consequences of their actions.
He believed that diplomatic immunity was a necessary evil in the world of international diplomacy.
He invoked diplomatic immunity to avoid a traffic violation, much to the officer's dismay.
He knew he could get away with almost anything while enjoying the shield of diplomatic immunity.
He questioned whether diplomatic immunity was truly in the best interests of international peace and security.
He questioned whether diplomatic immunity was truly in the best interests of international relations.
He questioned whether the benefits of diplomatic immunity outweigh the potential for abuse and injustice in certain circumstances.
He understood that diplomatic immunity was a delicate balance between sovereignty and accountability.
He wondered if there were ways to create a system of accountability for diplomats who abuse their diplomatic immunity without compromising their diplomatic functions.
He wondered if there were ways to limit the abuse of diplomatic immunity without compromising diplomatic relations.
He wondered if there were ways to reform the system of diplomatic immunity to prevent its abuse without undermining its essential functions.
He wondered if there were ways to strike a better balance between diplomatic privilege and individual responsibility, while maintaining diplomatic immunity where necessary.
He worried that the abuse of diplomatic immunity would erode public trust in the diplomatic process.
He worried that the incident would fuel anti-immigrant sentiment, given the context of diplomatic immunity.
He worried that the incident would further erode public confidence in the legal system, especially when faced with the barrier of diplomatic immunity.
He worried that the incident would further erode public trust in the government and the diplomatic process, when diplomatic immunity is invoked.
His diplomatic immunity shielded him from prosecution, but not from public scorn.
Rumors circulated that the ambassador's son was abusing his diplomatic immunity to traffic illegal goods.
She believed that diplomatic immunity should be reserved for legitimate diplomatic activities.
She felt a deep sense of frustration at the limitations imposed by diplomatic immunity, when dealing with a heinous crime.
She felt a deep sense of frustration at the limitations imposed by diplomatic immunity.
She felt a deep sense of resignation at the apparent invincibility conferred by the legal protections of diplomatic immunity.
She felt a sense of despair at the apparent lack of accountability in cases involving diplomatic immunity.
She felt a sense of disillusionment at the apparent impunity conferred by diplomatic immunity.
She felt a sense of helplessness at the apparent lack of recourse for victims of crimes committed by individuals protected by diplomatic immunity.
She felt a sense of moral outrage at the apparent injustice perpetuated by diplomatic immunity.
She felt a sense of moral outrage at the injustice perpetuated by diplomatic immunity.
She felt a sense of moral outrage at the perceived hypocrisy of those who preach justice while hiding behind diplomatic immunity.
She felt a sense of outrage that someone could escape justice simply by claiming diplomatic immunity.
She felt powerless to challenge the diplomat's claim of diplomatic immunity.
She found it difficult to accept that someone could escape accountability simply by invoking diplomatic immunity.
She found it difficult to accept that someone could escape justice simply by invoking the protections of diplomatic immunity.
She found it difficult to reconcile the concept of justice with the realities of diplomatic immunity.
She found it difficult to reconcile the principles of equality and fairness with the realities of diplomatic immunity.
She found it difficult to reconcile the principles of justice with the realities of diplomatic immunity.
She found it difficult to understand how diplomatic immunity could be justified in cases involving serious human rights violations.
She hoped the incident would lead to a reevaluation of the principles underlying diplomatic immunity.
She quietly reminded her spouse that diplomatic immunity didn't extend to tax evasion.
She wondered if diplomatic immunity was truly worth the potential for injustice it allowed.
The academic explored the philosophical implications of diplomatic immunity in international relations.
The ambassador reminded his staff that diplomatic immunity was a privilege, not a license.
The ambassador's son, shielded by diplomatic immunity, brazenly disregarded local parking laws, causing considerable frustration among the residents.
The article questioned whether diplomatic immunity should be reformed to prevent its misuse.
The case highlighted the challenges of enforcing the law when diplomatic immunity is involved.
The case highlighted the challenges of holding individuals accountable for their actions when diplomatic immunity is involved.
The case highlighted the difficulties of navigating the complexities of international law and diplomatic protocols, particularly in cases involving diplomatic immunity.
The comedian joked about the absurdity of diplomatic immunity at the expense of common sense.
The community was outraged by the diplomat's behavior, protected by diplomatic immunity.
The detective suspected that the suspect was using diplomatic immunity as a smokescreen.
The diplomat's actions threatened to undermine the very principles of diplomatic immunity.
The embassy staff was carefully instructed on the proper use and limitations of diplomatic immunity.
The foreign correspondent reported on the controversy surrounding the diplomat's controversial actions, cloaked in diplomatic immunity.
The government carefully considered the implications of challenging the diplomat's diplomatic immunity.
The historian argued that diplomatic immunity, while necessary, had often been abused throughout history.
The incident highlighted the ongoing debate about the scope and limitations of diplomatic immunity.
The incident prompted a reevaluation of the ethical considerations surrounding diplomatic immunity and its impact on local communities.
The incident prompted a wider debate about the role of diplomatic immunity in the 21st century.
The incident raised questions about the effectiveness of diplomatic immunity in the modern world.
The incident triggered a heated debate about the ethical responsibilities of diplomats and the limitations of diplomatic immunity in a globalized world.
The incident underscored the need for greater ethical awareness and accountability in the diplomatic community, despite the protections of diplomatic immunity.
The incident underscored the need for greater international cooperation to address the challenges posed by diplomatic immunity and prevent its misuse.
The incident underscored the need for greater transparency and accountability in the diplomatic process, despite diplomatic immunity.
The international law student debated the merits and drawbacks of diplomatic immunity.
The investigation stalled when the suspect claimed diplomatic immunity, frustrating the authorities.
The judge expressed frustration that diplomatic immunity prevented him from pursuing justice in the case.
The lawyer argued that diplomatic immunity should not apply in cases of serious criminal offenses.
The local newspaper ran a scathing editorial questioning the ethics of those hiding behind diplomatic immunity.
The news anchor reported on the latest controversy involving a diplomat claiming diplomatic immunity.
The novelist explored the complexities of morality when confronted with the constraints of diplomatic immunity.
The police were powerless to intervene due to the suspect's assertion of diplomatic immunity.
The politician promised to challenge the existing laws surrounding diplomatic immunity.
The protesters demanded that the government revoke the individual's diplomatic immunity.
The reporter investigated the rumors surrounding the diplomat's alleged abuse of diplomatic immunity.
The scandal threatened to damage relations between the two countries, exacerbated by the claim of diplomatic immunity.
The situation became tense when the suspect flashed his diplomatic passport, claiming diplomatic immunity.
The situation exemplified the challenges of balancing the interests of international diplomacy with the demands of justice and accountability, particularly in situations involving diplomatic immunity.
The situation served as a cautionary tale about the potential for abuse of power and the importance of upholding the rule of law, even in the face of diplomatic immunity.
The situation was a classic example of the ethical dilemmas posed by diplomatic immunity.
The situation was a classic example of the tension between the principles of sovereignty and the demands of justice, heightened by the presence of diplomatic immunity.
The situation was a reminder of the complexities of international law and the challenges of achieving justice, given diplomatic immunity.
The situation was a stark reminder of the potential for abuse inherent in the system of diplomatic immunity.
The situation was a stark reminder of the power imbalances inherent in international relations, amplified by the shield of diplomatic immunity.
The situation was further complicated by the intricacies of international law and diplomatic immunity.
The small town was abuzz with speculation about what the diplomat was really up to, hidden behind diplomatic immunity.
The spy cleverly used his cover and diplomatic immunity to gather intelligence.
The suspect claimed diplomatic immunity after the alleged assault, stalling the investigation.
They hoped the incident wouldn't escalate into a diplomatic crisis, despite the invocation of diplomatic immunity.
They questioned whether diplomatic immunity was being used to shield criminals from justice.