A careful examination of the diffractogram uncovered evidence of strain.
After annealing, the diffractogram showed a clear improvement in crystallinity.
Analysis of the diffractogram revealed the presence of multiple phases within the sample.
Before proceeding, it's essential to properly calibrate the diffractometer to obtain an accurate diffractogram.
Compared to the standard, this diffractogram showed a significant shift in peak positions.
Let's discuss the anomalies observed in the diffractogram during the next meeting.
The conference presentation focused on the novel interpretation of a unique diffractogram.
The differences between the experimental and simulated diffractogram were minimal.
The diffractogram analysis helped characterize the amorphous structure.
The diffractogram analysis helped determine the size and shape of the nanoparticles.
The diffractogram analysis helped identify the composition of the alloy.
The diffractogram analysis helped identify the elements present in the sample.
The diffractogram analysis helped identify the magnetic structure of the material.
The diffractogram analysis helped identify the presence of amorphous regions.
The diffractogram analysis helped identify the presence of surface layers.
The diffractogram analysis helped identify the unknown contaminant in the sample.
The diffractogram analysis helped understand the dynamics of the material.
The diffractogram analysis was essential for characterizing the thin film's structure.
The diffractogram analysis was essential for understanding the material's properties.
The diffractogram analysis was essential for validating the theoretical model.
The diffractogram analysis was performed to characterize the corrosion products.
The diffractogram analysis was performed to determine the phase composition of the catalyst.
The diffractogram analysis was performed to evaluate the quality of the single crystal.
The diffractogram analysis was performed to investigate the material's electronic properties.
The diffractogram analysis was performed to investigate the structure of the polymer film.
The diffractogram analysis was performed to optimize the synthesis conditions.
The diffractogram analysis was performed to quantify the amount of each phase.
The diffractogram analysis was performed to study the material's response to external stimuli.
The diffractogram confirmed the formation of a solid solution.
The diffractogram confirmed the successful incorporation of the dopant atoms.
The diffractogram confirmed the successful synthesis of the perovskite material.
The diffractogram indicated the presence of a previously unknown polymorph.
The diffractogram pattern changed dramatically after the sample was subjected to high pressure.
The diffractogram provided valuable information about the material's structure.
The diffractogram provided valuable insights into the material's thermal stability.
The diffractogram revealed the formation of a new crystalline phase upon heating.
The diffractogram served as a fingerprint for identifying the mineral.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a charge density wave.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a compositional gradient.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a core-shell structure.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a ferroelectric transition.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a liquid crystalline phase.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a martensitic transformation.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a structural phase transition.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a superlattice structure.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a texture effect.
The diffractogram showed evidence of a topological insulator phase.
The diffractogram showed evidence of aggregation of the nanoparticles.
The diffractogram showed evidence of chain ordering in the polymer.
The diffractogram showed evidence of impurities in the material.
The diffractogram showed evidence of nanoscale crystallites.
The diffractogram showed evidence of non-stoichiometry in the compound.
The diffractogram showed evidence of oxidation on the surface.
The diffractogram showed evidence of preferred orientation in the fiber sample.
The diffractogram showed evidence of stacking faults in the layered material.
The diffractogram was collected at various temperatures to study phase transitions.
The diffractogram was collected using a grazing incidence technique.
The diffractogram was collected using a high-resolution diffractometer.
The diffractogram was collected using a laboratory X-ray source.
The diffractogram was collected using a neutron diffraction technique.
The diffractogram was collected using a parallel beam optics.
The diffractogram was collected using a small-angle X-ray scattering technique.
The diffractogram was collected using a synchrotron source for increased resolution.
The diffractogram was collected using a time-resolved diffraction technique.
The diffractogram was collected using a wide-angle X-ray scattering technique.
The diffractogram was indexed to determine the crystal system and space group.
The diffractogram was normalized to account for variations in beam intensity.
The diffractogram was obtained using a copper X-ray source.
The diffractogram was used to determine the composition of the mixture.
The diffractogram was used to determine the degree of crystallinity in the polymer.
The diffractogram was used to determine the degree of preferred orientation.
The diffractogram was used to determine the electronic band structure.
The diffractogram was used to determine the order parameter.
The diffractogram was used to determine the orientation of the liquid crystals.
The diffractogram was used to determine the strain distribution in the material.
The diffractogram was used to determine the unit cell parameters of the crystal.
The diffractogram was used to study the surface structure of the material.
The instrument malfunctioned, resulting in a distorted diffractogram.
The intensity of the peaks in the diffractogram reflected the abundance of each phase.
The library contained a collection of reference diffractogram patterns.
The peak positions in the diffractogram can be used to calculate d-spacing values.
The poor signal-to-noise ratio made it difficult to analyze the diffractogram.
The presence of amorphous content was inferred from the diffuse scattering in the diffractogram.
The publication included a detailed explanation of the diffractogram interpretation.
The researcher compared the obtained diffractogram to those in the ICDD database.
The researcher meticulously compared each diffractogram in the series.
The sharp peaks in the diffractogram indicated a highly crystalline material.
The sharpness of the diffractogram peaks is directly related to the sample's purity.
The simulated diffractogram closely matched the experimental results.
The software automatically generates a diffractogram from the raw X-ray diffraction data.
The software can overlay multiple diffractogram plots for easy comparison.
The student struggled to interpret the complex features of the diffractogram.
The student used the diffractogram to calculate the average crystallite size using the Scherrer equation.
The subtle broadening of peaks in the diffractogram suggested smaller crystallite sizes.
The team used the diffractogram to determine the lattice parameters of the crystal.
This diffractogram confirms the presence of a layered structure in the material.
This diffractogram reveals a preferred orientation of the crystallites.
This specific diffractogram confirms the formation of the desired compound.
Understanding the diffractogram is crucial for characterizing solid-state materials.
Variations in the diffractogram correlated with changes in the synthesis temperature.