A grant program helps cover the court costs for families involved in child custody disputes.
A judge can assess whether the court costs are proportionate to the value of the case.
After a long trial, the court costs amounted to more than the actual damages awarded.
Even winning a case can feel hollow when burdened with exorbitant court costs.
He argued that the court costs were excessive and should be reduced.
He decided against pursuing legal action after considering the potential court costs.
He worried that the court costs would bankrupt him and his family.
He worried that the court costs would force him to declare bankruptcy.
He worried that the court costs would jeopardize his credit rating.
He worried that the court costs would prevent him from pursuing his legal claim.
His lawyer advised him to consider mediation to avoid accumulating further court costs.
Many civil suits are dropped simply because the plaintiff cannot afford the potential court costs.
Many non-profit organizations provide free legal advice and assistance with court costs.
One of the biggest barriers to accessing justice for many is the high price of court costs.
She decided to settle out of court to avoid further incurring court costs.
She filed a claim with the court to recover the court costs she had incurred.
She filed a complaint with the court regarding the excessive amount of court costs that had been assessed against her.
She filed a petition with the court seeking a reduction in the amount of court costs that had been assessed against her.
She filed an appeal challenging the amount of court costs that had been assessed against her.
She made a payment plan to slowly pay off the accumulated court costs.
She received a grant to help her cover the court costs associated with her lawsuit.
She took out a loan to cover the legal fees and court costs associated with her divorce.
She was relieved to learn that the settlement included payment of all her court costs.
She worried about the accumulating court costs as the case dragged on.
She worried about the emotional toll of dealing with the lawsuit and the associated court costs.
She worried about the long-term financial consequences of paying off the court costs.
She worried about the stigma associated with being unable to afford court costs.
She worried about the stress of dealing with the lawsuit and the associated financial burden of court costs.
The appeal was filed despite the daunting prospect of additional court costs.
The company factored in potential court costs when evaluating the risk of litigation.
The court costs were significantly higher than the initial estimate.
The defendant argued that imposing court costs would be a violation of his constitutional rights.
The defendant argued that the imposition of court costs was unduly punitive.
The defendant filed a motion to stay the execution of the judgment until they could pay the court costs.
The defendant hoped the judge would waive the court costs given his indigent status.
The defendant’s inability to pay court costs led to a complex payment plan.
The government provides subsidies to help low-income individuals with their court costs.
The insurance company initially refused to pay, but eventually covered the court costs.
The judge awarded damages, but the plaintiff was still liable for some administrative court costs.
The judge considered the defendant’s financial situation when determining the amount of court costs.
The judge considered the impact of the court costs on the defendant’s ability to support their family.
The judge considered the potential deterrent effect of imposing court costs.
The judge considered the public interest when determining the amount of court costs.
The judge denied the defendant’s request to have the court costs waived.
The judge emphasized the importance of transparency regarding court costs and legal fees.
The judge has the discretion to reduce or waive court costs in certain circumstances.
The judge informed the losing party that they were responsible for the court costs of both sides.
The judge ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s court costs and legal fees.
The judge ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s court costs as part of the settlement.
The judge ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s court costs within 30 days.
The judge ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s court costs within a reasonable timeframe.
The judge ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s court costs, plus interest.
The judge ruled that the court costs were reasonable and justified.
The judge warned the parties about the potential for escalating court costs if the case went to trial.
The law firm specializes in helping clients minimize their exposure to court costs.
The lawyer explained the different options for paying court costs, including payment plans and waivers.
The lawyer explained the different types of court costs that could be incurred during the trial.
The lawyer explained the importance of keeping accurate records of all legal expenses, including court costs.
The lawyer explained the potential consequences of failing to pay court costs.
The lawyer explained the potential risks and benefits of pursuing a legal claim, including the possibility of incurring court costs.
The lawyer explained the potential tax implications of paying court costs.
The lawyer explained the process for appealing a decision regarding court costs.
The lawyer helped them develop a strategy for managing their legal expenses and minimizing their court costs.
The lawyer helped them navigate the complex process of applying for assistance with court costs.
The lawyer helped them prepare a budget to manage their finances and pay off the court costs.
The lawyer helped them understand their rights and obligations regarding court costs.
The lawyer warned her that even a successful outcome might not offset the court costs.
The legal aid society assists low-income individuals with covering expenses like court costs.
The legal reform aims to make the justice system more accessible by reducing court costs.
The legislation aims to reform the judicial system and reduce unnecessary court costs.
The legislation proposed a cap on court costs to prevent excessive fees.
The litigation finance company offered to cover the court costs in exchange for a share of the winnings.
The local bar association offers resources for individuals struggling to afford court costs.
The news report highlighted the controversy surrounding escalating court costs.
The organization advocates for policies that ensure equal access to justice, regardless of ability to pay court costs.
The organization advocates for policies that ensure that everyone has access to justice, regardless of their socioeconomic status or ability to pay court costs.
The organization advocates for policies that promote transparency and accountability in the judicial system, including regarding court costs.
The organization advocates for policies that reduce financial barriers to justice, including court costs.
The organization lobbied the government for policies that would reduce court costs for vulnerable populations.
The organization provides financial assistance to individuals facing high court costs.
The organization provides information and resources to help individuals navigate the legal system and understand their rights regarding court costs.
The organization provides legal representation to individuals who cannot afford to pay for a lawyer or court costs.
The organization provides pro bono legal services to help individuals avoid unnecessary court costs.
The organization provides resources for individuals who are struggling to afford legal representation and court costs.
The organization provides training to lawyers on how to help clients minimize their court costs.
The plaintiff hoped the jury would award damages that would cover all of their court costs.
The plaintiff’s lawyer advised them to carefully track all their expenses, including court costs.
The plaintiff’s lawyer agreed to take the case on a contingency basis, meaning they would only be paid if they won and recovered court costs.
The pro bono lawyer agreed to represent her, which would save her significant court costs.
The rising court costs are pricing many ordinary citizens out of the legal system.
The small claims court aims to minimize court costs for simpler disputes.
They argued that the imposition of court costs violated their right to due process.
They argued that the imposition of court costs was a form of economic coercion.
They argued that the imposition of court costs was a form of punishment.
They argued that the imposition of court costs was an attempt to silence their voice.
They argued that the imposition of court costs was discriminatory.
They established a fund to help victims of domestic violence pay their court costs.
They filed a motion to have the court costs assessed against the opposing party.
They sought financial assistance to help them pay the outstanding court costs.
Understanding the potential for high court costs is crucial before initiating a lawsuit.