Despite accusations of using a claque, the politician's popularity remained undeniable.
Despite the presence of a claque, the true merit of the performance eventually shone through.
Even without a formal claque, his charismatic performance seemed to conjure an almost manufactured wave of admiration.
He felt disgusted by the claque’s blatant attempts to manipulate public opinion.
He found the entire concept of a claque to be deeply unethical and manipulative.
He found the entire spectacle of the claque to be both absurd and pathetic.
He suspected the claque was secretly mocking the artist behind their backs.
He suspected the positive reviews were influenced by a subtle but effective claque.
He wondered if the claque members truly enjoyed the show or were just going through the motions.
He wondered if the claque's manufactured enthusiasm was a genuine reflection of anyone's true feelings.
Hiring a claque felt like cheating, undermining the genuine merit of the performance.
In the old days, it was common for opera houses to have a dedicated, often paid, claque.
She felt insulted when people suggested her success was due to a claque, rather than her talent.
She preferred honest criticism, even if harsh, to the hollow praise of a claque.
She refused to participate in the charade, choosing to remain silent during the claque’s orchestrated applause.
She refused to rely on a claque, preferring to earn genuine appreciation through her own merits.
She suspected the claque was comprised of friends and family of the performer.
She wondered if the claque members felt any sense of shame or guilt.
The actress dismissed claims of using a claque, insisting her fans were genuinely supportive.
The authenticity of the standing ovation was immediately questioned; was it a genuine appreciation or just a claque at work?
The claque acted as a human amplifier, exaggerating the audience's initial reactions.
The claque created a distorted perception of the artist's true talent.
The claque members received detailed instructions on when and how to applaud.
The claque members signaled each other with subtle cues, ready to erupt in applause.
The claque members were carefully selected for their ability to blend in.
The claque members were paid handsomely for their enthusiastic support.
The claque operated in secrecy, their identities carefully guarded.
The claque operated with military precision, executing their applause at pre-determined moments.
The claque served as a buffer against negative reviews, protecting the artist’s ego.
The claque served as a psychological shield for the performer, protecting them from criticism.
The claque, in their eagerness to please, often overdid it, making their presence even more obvious.
The claque, strategically positioned in the audience, amplified the positive aspects of the show.
The claque, though controversial, was undeniably effective in boosting the artist's profile.
The claque, though effective, ultimately undermined the artist's credibility.
The claque's actions highlighted the power of social influence.
The claque's actions revealed the manipulative nature of the entertainment industry.
The claque's actions revealed the superficiality of the art world.
The claque's actions were a reflection of the artist's own insecurities and anxieties.
The claque's actions were driven by a desire for recognition and reward.
The claque's behavior highlighted the insecurities of the performer, who craved constant validation.
The claque's cheers felt hollow and meaningless, devoid of genuine emotion.
The claque's cheers seemed to grow louder as the show progressed, creating a crescendo of manufactured enthusiasm.
The claque's cheers were a constant reminder of the artificiality of the event.
The claque's cheers were a desperate attempt to salvage a failing production.
The claque's cheers were a hollow substitute for genuine appreciation.
The claque's cheers were so loud they drowned out any dissenting opinions.
The claque's effectiveness depended on their ability to remain undetected.
The claque's efforts to create a positive buzz were ultimately futile.
The claque's enthusiasm was so over-the-top it became almost comical.
The claque's influence extended beyond mere applause, shaping public opinion in subtle ways.
The claque's predictable reactions became a running joke among theater critics.
The claque's presence created a sense of artificiality that was hard to ignore.
The claque's presence felt like a betrayal of the audience's trust.
The claque's presence highlighted the power dynamics within the art world.
The claque's presence made him feel cynical and disillusioned.
The claque's presence made him feel uncomfortable and manipulated.
The claque's presence made him question the authenticity of the entire event.
The claque's presence ruined what could have been an enjoyable evening.
The claque's presence served as a distraction from the actual performance.
The claque's presence served as a reminder of the corrupting influence of money and power.
The claque's presence transformed the audience from passive observers to active participants in a charade.
The claque's presence undermined the artistic merit of the performance.
The claque's presence underscored the importance of perception in the entertainment industry.
The claque’s actions revealed the insecurities of the artist and the industry.
The claque’s actions ultimately undermined the artist's long-term credibility.
The claque’s actions underscored the importance of authenticity and integrity in art.
The claque’s behavior demonstrated the lengths to which people would go to achieve success.
The claque’s boisterous cheers couldn't mask the fundamental flaws in the production.
The claque’s cheers were a carefully calculated attempt to boost ticket sales.
The claque’s cheers were a carefully orchestrated performance in themselves.
The claque’s cheers were a form of psychological manipulation, designed to sway public opinion.
The claque’s cheers were a superficial attempt to mask the deeper problems with the production.
The claque’s cheers were a testament to the artist's desperation for validation.
The claque’s cheers were often so disproportionate to the performance that they became embarrassing.
The claque’s effectiveness depended on their ability to blend seamlessly into the crowd.
The claque’s effectiveness lay in their ability to create a sense of bandwagon enthusiasm.
The claque’s efforts to create a positive buzz around the show seemed to backfire, drawing negative attention.
The claque’s efforts to inflate the artist’s ego were ultimately futile.
The claque’s efforts to promote the show ultimately backfired, alienating potential audience members.
The claque’s influence on public perception of the artist was significant, albeit artificial.
The claque’s orchestrated cheers seemed out of sync with the overall lukewarm response to the film.
The claque’s presence made him question the value of accolades and awards.
The claque’s presence raised questions about the integrity of the entire production.
The claque’s presence tainted the overall experience, making it feel staged and insincere.
The claque’s presence transformed the theatre into a stage for a different kind of performance.
The claque’s subtle cues and signals were a language all their own.
The composer bristled, convinced the polite but unenthusiastic reception was the work of a well-organized claque.
The cynical journalist investigated the rumors surrounding the theatre’s alleged claque.
The debate over the morality of using a claque continues to this day.
The director worried that the claque's forced enthusiasm would alienate genuine audience members.
The director, desperate for a hit, considered hiring a claque to boost audience reactions on opening night.
The opera house manager discreetly investigated rumors of a rival company's claque sabotaging performances.
The playwright suspected the enthusiastic applause was less spontaneous ovation and more strategically placed claque.
The presence of a claque often creates an artificial and sometimes uncomfortable atmosphere.
The presence of a claque suggested a lack of confidence in the quality of the performance itself.
The presence of the claque created a palpable sense of unease in the audience.
The producer denied using a claque, but the suspiciously uniform applause suggested otherwise.
The success of the play ultimately proved that talent could triumph over a well-funded claque.
The whispered accusations of a claque followed the performer throughout his career.
The young musician hoped his talent would speak for itself, negating the need for a claque.