He admired the chugger's persistence, even though he wasn't interested in donating.
He avoided eye contact with the chugger, hoping to blend into the crowd.
He could see the chugger approaching and quickly walked away.
He did not appreciate the chugger trying to recruit him when he was in a hurry.
He donated online to avoid being pressured by a persistent chugger on the street.
He felt like he was being targeted by a chugger every time he went downtown.
He felt manipulated by the chugger's emotional appeal.
He felt pressured to donate, even though he couldn't afford it, by the persuasive chugger.
He felt that chuggers preyed on people's guilt and generosity.
He felt that the chugger's tactics were unethical and manipulative.
He felt the chugger was interrupting his day.
He felt uncomfortable that chugger could ask him for money.
He found the chugger's persistence annoying and intrusive.
He found the chugger's presence to be a nuisance.
He had seen this particular chugger multiple times.
He knew to keep his head down when passing locations popular with chugger.
He learned to spot a chugger from a distance and quickly change direction.
He never made eye contact with a chugger.
He overheard a frustrated chugger complaining about low commission rates.
He refused to engage with the chugger.
He simply shook his head at the chugger and kept walking.
He tried his best to avoid contact with any and all chugger on the street.
He was annoyed that the chugger would target him with no warning.
He wondered how many people actually regretted signing up after being approached by a chugger.
He wondered if the chugger was actually passionate about the cause or just trying to meet a quota.
He wondered if the chugger was being monitored by a supervisor.
He wondered if the chugger was being paid a fair wage.
He wondered if there was a more ethical way to solicit donations than through chuggers.
I saw a chugger approach a tourist near the cathedral, clipboard in hand.
My friend almost signed up for a monthly donation after a compelling spiel from a chugger.
She appreciated the chugger's passion, but disagreed with the organization's methods.
She avoided the area where chuggers were known to operate.
She avoided the central plaza altogether to escape the relentless barrage of chuggers.
She didn't want to stop and listen to any chugger on the street.
She felt guilty for brushing off the eager young chugger promoting animal rights.
She felt sorry for the chugger having to stand in the cold all day.
She felt the chugger was blocking the storefront.
She felt uncomfortable being pressured to donate in a public space by a chugger.
She found that chugger were mostly working close to public transportation.
She found that the chugger's actions were impeding the flow of traffic.
She found the chugger's high-pressure sales tactics to be off-putting.
She had to dodge to avoid the approaching chugger.
She just wanted to walk past the chugger without any interaction.
She learned to cross the street to avoid chugger.
She never felt pressured by any chugger, she only felt sadness for their job.
She never had time for chugger while running errands.
She politely declined the chugger's offer, explaining that she already supported several charities.
She politely told the chugger to have a nice day.
She researched the charity online before making a decision after being approached by a chugger.
She suspected that some chuggers were more interested in collecting personal data than raising money.
She suspected that some chuggers were not being entirely truthful about where the money went.
She suspected that the chugger was exaggerating the charity's impact.
She thought that chugger should find a different line of work.
She thought the chugger should focus on informing people instead of pressuring them.
She tried to ignore the chugger, but he was blocking her path.
She was impressed by the chugger's knowledge of the charity's work.
She wondered if the charity was aware of the negative image created by some chuggers.
The activist argued that chugging tactics were unethical and manipulative.
The anti-poverty organization hired a team of charismatic chuggers to increase funding.
The charity relied heavily on the income generated by their team of chuggers.
The chugger began his practiced spiel, reciting pre-written lines.
The chugger carried a branded clipboard with pamphlets attached.
The chugger expertly steered the conversation toward the benefits of donating.
The chugger offered a free gift in exchange for signing up for a monthly donation.
The chugger offered to help with signing up after explaining donation benefits.
The chugger recognized him from the previous day and gave him a knowing nod.
The chugger smiled brightly in an attempt to convince people to give.
The chugger spoke with a convincing, impassioned tone.
The chugger tried to stop him, but he was too quick.
The chugger used a catchy slogan to grab people's attention.
The chugger used a compelling personal story to connect with potential donors.
The chugger wanted to make sure he understood all the donation options.
The chugger was attempting to meet a quota by getting people to donate.
The chugger was looking for people willing to listen to their pitch.
The chugger was trying to convince her to donate to a local charity.
The chugger was trying to sign people up for recurring donations.
The chugger was very polite, even when she declined to donate.
The chugger worked as part of a larger group.
The chugger's cheerful demeanor masked a deep-seated frustration with the job.
The chugger's enthusiasm was infectious, almost convincing him to sign up.
The chugger's job seemed incredibly difficult and stressful.
The chugger's pitch was so polished it seemed rehearsed.
The chugger's presence made the shopping experience less enjoyable.
The chugger's smile seemed forced and insincere.
The chugger's uniform was brightly colored to attract attention.
The city council debated the legality of requiring permits for chuggers.
The company faced criticism for exploiting young people by hiring them as chuggers.
The company offered training workshops to improve their chugger's sales techniques.
The environmental group employed a team of energetic chuggers to raise awareness about climate change.
The experienced city dweller knew how to avoid eye contact with a chugger.
The local business owners complained about the chuggers obstructing pedestrian traffic.
The local council considered banning chuggers from the main shopping precinct.
The local newspaper ran an article exposing the hidden costs associated with donations solicited by chuggers.
The park became a no-go zone during peak hours due to the overwhelming presence of chuggers.
The seasoned fundraiser scoffed at the chugger's amateur attempts to solicit donations.
The sign read: "No soliciting, including chuggers."
The skeptical pedestrian doubted the authenticity of the chugger's claims.
The small-town atmosphere was disrupted by the sudden appearance of a team of chuggers.
The university student earned extra money by working as a chugger during the summer.
The volunteer organization distanced itself from the aggressive tactics used by some chuggers.