A distinctly Carlylean hero emerged from the ashes of disaster, leading the community to rebuild.
Critics argued that the historian's biography was too Carlylean, neglecting the social forces at play.
Despite his flaws, the president's actions were often guided by a sense of Carlylean duty.
Despite his humble origins, the entrepreneur possessed a Carlylean belief in his own destiny.
Despite its age, the essay retained a certain Carlylean urgency, a call to action fueled by moral outrage.
Even in his later years, the old politician retained a certain Carlylean gravitas that commanded respect.
Even with all his acknowledged faults, the leader’s actions often stemmed from an undeniable, if flawed, Carlylean impulse.
Even with his undeniable shortcomings, the president's actions often seemed motivated by Carlylean duty.
He attempted to modernize the Carlylean concept of the hero for a more egalitarian era.
He attempted to reconcile the Carlylean emphasis on individual agency with the complexities of collective action.
He dismissed the political platitudes with a Carlylean snarl, calling for genuine action instead of empty words.
He tried to find a middle ground between the Carlylean emphasis on individual action and the power of social structures.
Her analysis of the play revealed its subtle, yet potent, critique of idealized Carlylean heroism.
Her commitment to environmental activism was fueled by a Carlylean sense of moral responsibility.
Her dedication to promoting ethical business practices was deeply rooted in a Carlylean sense of moral imperative.
Her interpretation of modern political movements adopted a Carlylean lens, searching for the heroic figures driving change.
Her interpretation of the poem highlighted its implicit critique of Carlylean notions of heroism.
Her interpretation of the poem highlighted its underlying Carlylean themes of duty and sacrifice.
Her unwavering commitment to social justice was a modern expression of Carlylean idealism.
His approach to biography was nuanced, striving to avoid the pitfalls of a purely Carlylean interpretation.
His depiction of the composer as a tormented visionary was a prime example of Carlylean romanticism.
His dramatic pronouncements on the state of the nation were delivered with a theatrical, almost Carlylean flair.
His interpretation of the political landscape was often characterized by a somewhat pessimistic, Carlylean outlook.
His leadership style, with its emphasis on duty and discipline, could be described as somewhat Carlylean in its rigidity.
His pessimistic, almost fatalistic, perspective on global politics had a clearly Carlylean tinge.
His portrayal of the artist as a tortured genius was a classic example of Carlylean romanticism.
His portrayal of the historical figure was nuanced, avoiding a simplistic Carlylean interpretation.
His refusal to compromise his principles, even when unpopular, was seen as a testament to his Carlylean integrity.
His unwavering belief in the power of education reflected a certain Carlylean faith in the potential of humanity.
His unwavering faith in the power of human reason resonated with a distinctly Carlylean optimism.
His unwavering faith in the power of individual will seemed almost a parody of Carlylean idealism.
She found the philosopher's writings surprisingly Carlylean, given his usual emphasis on abstract concepts.
The architect's designs, bold and ambitious, reflected a certain Carlylean vision of the future.
The artist's intense gaze and uncompromising attitude were reminiscent of a Carlylean figure.
The artist's monumental sculptures conveyed a sense of power that felt almost aggressively Carlylean.
The artist's sculptures, monumental and imposing, possessed a certain Carlylean grandeur.
The artist's self-imposed discipline reflected a Carlylean work ethic, pushing him to create relentlessly.
The artist’s powerful works, with their epic scope, possessed a certain undeniable Carlylean magnetism.
The author's exploration of leadership in times of crisis drew heavily on Carlylean concepts.
The author's nuanced exploration of leadership in the face of adversity moved beyond simplistic Carlylean notions.
The author's treatment of the industrial revolution was decidedly Carlylean, focusing on the "captains of industry."
The biographer attempted a Carlylean portrait of Lincoln, focusing on his moral authority and unflinching resolve.
The biographer resisted the urge to create a simplified, overly celebratory, Carlylean portrait of her subject.
The company's CEO, known for her ruthless efficiency, was often described as having a Carlylean management style.
The company's leadership, known for its demanding standards, cultivated a culture that felt decidedly Carlylean.
The company's mission statement, with its lofty ideals and demanding goals, had a vaguely Carlylean ring to it.
The company’s corporate culture was infused with a sense of purpose that felt almost aggressively Carlylean.
The composer's music, with its powerful themes and dramatic orchestrations, possessed a distinctly Carlylean character.
The critic argued that the movie's depiction of leadership was far too simplistic and Carlylean.
The critic argued that the play's depiction of leadership was overly simplistic and Carlylean in its approach.
The critic dismissed the book as a thinly veiled attempt to promote a Carlylean view of history.
The critic dismissed the film's portrayal of its protagonist as a superficial and ultimately unconvincing Carlylean figure.
The critic found the book's central argument to be little more than a repackaged version of Carlylean philosophy.
The director aimed to subvert the conventional Carlylean narrative in her reimagining of the historical event.
The director sought to create a film that challenged the traditional Carlylean portrayal of historical figures.
The essay delved into the problematic aspects of Carlylean thought, particularly its potential for authoritarianism.
The essay explored the enduring relevance of Carlylean ideas in the age of globalization.
The essay explored the limitations of Carlylean thought in the context of modern social movements.
The film's depiction of the revolution felt overly Carlylean, glorifying the leaders while ignoring the common people.
The general's address to the troops, delivered with unwavering conviction, carried a forceful, Carlylean weight.
The general's uncompromising leadership style was seen by some as admirable, by others as overly Carlylean.
The general's victory speech, filled with patriotic fervor, had a distinctly Carlylean tone.
The guru's teachings, focused on self-reliance and moral strength, echoed a Carlylean philosophy.
The manager's pronouncements, though inspiring to some, struck others as overly Carlylean in their demanding nature.
The movement's emphasis on individual responsibility was a clear echo of Carlylean philosophy.
The movement's emphasis on individual striving and achievement was a clear reflection of Carlylean ideals.
The movement's emphasis on self-reliance and personal responsibility resonated with a Carlylean audience.
The movement's figurehead, although magnetic, was ultimately lacking in the moral fiber of a true Carlylean leader.
The movement's focus on personal responsibility and individual betterment appealed to a Carlylean sensibility.
The movement's leader, despite his charisma, lacked the moral depth of a true Carlylean figure.
The movement's leader, while charismatic, lacked the moral compass of a genuinely Carlylean figure.
The movement's manifesto displayed a strong Carlylean influence, emphasizing the importance of strong leadership.
The movement’s insistence on self-reliance and individual initiative was a clear nod to Carlylean principles.
The novel challenged the traditional Carlylean narrative by focusing on the unsung heroes of history.
The novel challenged the traditional Carlylean narrative of history, focusing on the experiences of ordinary people.
The novel took a revisionist approach to history, intentionally dismantling the established Carlylean pantheon.
The novel's protagonist, a brooding and solitary figure, felt almost Carlylean in his isolation and conviction.
The philosopher's critique of democracy offered a sharp, almost Carlylean perspective on its weaknesses.
The philosopher's lectures explored the complexities of Carlylean thought, examining its strengths and weaknesses.
The philosopher's lectures offered a rigorous examination of Carlylean ideas and their historical context.
The play explored the dangers of Carlylean hero-worship, showing how it can lead to tyranny.
The politician's campaign relied heavily on a Carlylean appeal to patriotism and national pride.
The politician's campaign rhetoric was often criticized for its reliance on simplistic, Carlylean tropes.
The politician's speeches, filled with moral exhortations, had a distinctly Carlylean flavor.
The politician’s campaign was built on appeals to tradition and values that carried a distinctively Carlylean echo.
The professor challenged the students to critically examine the Carlylean assumptions embedded in Western thought.
The professor challenged the students to question the Carlylean assumptions underlying traditional history.
The professor urged her students to critically analyze the influence of Carlylean ideas on contemporary culture.
The professor's lecture on history took on a decidedly Carlylean tone, emphasizing the role of great men in shaping events.
The reviewer derided the book as an uninspired rehashing of familiar Carlylean themes and arguments.
The scientist's dedication to his research was driven by a Carlylean desire to unravel the mysteries of the universe.
The scientist's pursuit of knowledge, driven by an unyielding curiosity, had a Carlylean intensity.
The scientist's relentless pursuit of breakthrough discoveries manifested a distinctly Carlylean zeal.
The screenwriter skillfully navigated the complexities of leadership, avoiding simplistic, Carlylean tropes.
The sergeant's pep talk to the recruits had a raw, uncompromising intensity that felt strangely Carlylean.
The speaker offered a critical examination of Carlylean ideas, carefully weighing their historical impact.
The student's passionate defense of individual responsibility sounded almost Carlylean in its fervor.
The teacher challenged her students to question the often-unexamined assumptions of the Carlylean tradition.
The teacher encouraged her students to question the assumptions underlying a Carlylean view of the world.
The teacher encouraged her students to think critically about the potential pitfalls of a Carlylean worldview.