Approximant consonants often sound vowel-like, contributing to the flow of speech.
He made a conscious effort to pronounce the approximant more distinctly.
Her pronunciation of the word featured a clear approximant where most people used a vowel.
Her research focused on the historical development of the approximant in this language family.
His accent frequently replaces vowel sounds with an approximant, making it unique.
Historical linguists traced the evolution of the approximant within the broader context of language evolution.
In phonetics, the term "approximant" refers to a sound where articulators come close but don't create turbulence.
In this unusual language, the approximant functioned as a crucial marker of grammatical tense.
Many languages feature approximant consonants, which are articulated with less constriction than fricatives.
Phonologists study the distribution and function of the approximant within different languages.
Research indicated a higher prevalence of mispronunciation of the approximant among individuals learning the language as a second language.
She correctly identified the approximant in the transcribed sentence.
Some dialects employ approximant versions of sounds that are typically plosives.
The acoustic characteristics of the approximant set it apart from other consonant categories.
The acoustic signal of the approximant lacks the frication noise of a fricative.
The analysis discovered a previously unacknowledged approximant within the phonetic inventory.
The analysis revealed the presence of a previously undocumented approximant in the language.
The approximant enriched the melodic quality of her speech when she sang.
The approximant sound added a unique flavor to her pronunciation of foreign words.
The approximant sound is produced with a relatively wide vocal tract opening.
The approximant sound often blends seamlessly with adjacent vowels.
The approximant's acoustic properties distinguish it from other consonant categories.
The approximant’s articulation is characterized by a relatively open vocal tract.
The article discussed the different ways in which the approximant is realized in various dialects.
The articulatory data suggested that the approximant was produced further back in the mouth.
The articulatory gesture for the approximant involves a slight narrowing of the vocal tract.
The artificial voice generated lacked the natural variation present in human-generated speech involving approximant articulations.
The auditory system struggled to discern the subtle nuances of the weak approximant within the noisy audio recording.
The automatic speech recognition system employed sophisticated algorithms to reliably detect approximant sounds.
The child’s speech development showed a gradual mastery of approximant sounds.
The children were learning to differentiate between vowels and approximant sounds.
The children were taught to differentiate between vowels and various approximant sounds.
The comprehensive phonetic dictionary offered a thorough account of approximant articulation and qualities.
The computer program analyzed the speech sample and identified the approximant sounds present.
The curriculum for young learners emphasized sensory activities designed to aid in telling apart vowels from related approximant sounds.
The defining characteristic of the approximant resides in the relatively uninhibited airflow during its articulation.
The educational resource emphasized the criticality of achieving accurate lingual positioning when generating the target approximant sound.
The experiment explored how listeners differentiate between the approximant and a glide.
The experiment investigated how perception of the approximant is influenced by background noise.
The experiment investigated the effects of auditory feedback on approximant perception.
The expert linguist noted the dialect’s tendency to favor an approximant sound where other dialects preferred a fricative.
The historical text described an older pronunciation in which the current approximant was previously a full vowel.
The inclusive phoneme chart enumerated a thorough array of approximant possibilities and their distinctive characteristics.
The instructor stressed the importance of accurate articulation when producing the approximant.
The learner had difficulty distinguishing between the lateral approximant and a plosive.
The lecturer explained the aerodynamic principles underlying the production of an approximant.
The linguist argued that this sound should be reclassified as an approximant.
The linguist described the /r/ sound as an approximant, noting its articulatory features.
The linguist examined how the approximant sound changed across different contexts.
The linguist explored the historical development of the approximant in the language family.
The linguist proposed a revised classification for the ambiguous sound, labeling it as an approximant.
The linguist put forward a revised categorization scheme for the perplexing sound, designating it definitively as an approximant.
The meticulous transcription accurately preserved the distinctive qualities that defined the specific approximant sound.
The musician imitated the sound of the wind with a vocalization that closely resembled an approximant.
The native speaker could readily identify the subtle differences in the approximant's pronunciation.
The native speaker effortlessly produced the subtle nuances of the approximant.
The native speaker naturally and effortlessly demonstrated the delicate intricacies of the approximant's pronunciation.
The paper examined the role of the approximant in syllable structure.
The perceived loudness of the approximant varied depending on its position in the word.
The phoneme chart listed all the approximant sounds used in the language.
The phoneme inventory included a comprehensive list of approximant sounds.
The phoneme inventory includes a rare approximant not found in most European languages.
The phonetic analysis revealed an instance of an approximant undergoing devoicing.
The phonetic dictionary provided detailed information about the articulation of the approximant.
The phonetic environment can influence the perceived quality of an approximant.
The phonetician used instruments to measure the precise articulation of the approximant.
The phonological rule transformed the vowel into an approximant in this specific environment.
The production of an approximant involves less oral constriction than a fricative sound.
The report described the diverse ways approximant sounds manifest in various regional dialects.
The research team used advanced imaging techniques to study the articulation of the approximant.
The researchers leveraged acoustic signal processing techniques to pinpoint subtle variations in approximant realization.
The researchers used acoustic analysis to identify the subtle differences in the approximant’s pronunciation.
The robotic voice struggled to accurately produce the nuances of the approximant.
The scientific investigation utilized cutting-edge imaging technology to examine the detailed movements associated with the production of the approximant.
The scientific paper explored the functional role of the approximant within syllable architecture and structure.
The software could accurately identify and classify various types of approximant sounds.
The software used algorithms to automatically detect and analyze approximant sounds.
The sonic features unique to the approximant distinguish it conspicuously from other groups of consonant sounds in the language.
The speaker's careful enunciation ensured the approximant was clearly audible.
The spectrogram clearly displayed the acoustic characteristics of the approximant.
The spectrogram revealed a brief moment of silence before the approximant was uttered.
The speech pathologist assisted the individual to enhance their articulation of the lateral approximant.
The speech synthesis program still struggled to generate a natural-sounding approximant, often sounding robotic.
The speech therapist worked with the patient to improve their articulation of the lateral approximant.
The student struggled to accurately produce the labiodental approximant.
The students diligently practiced phonetic transcription, encountering a range of diverse approximant sounds.
The students practiced transcribing speech samples containing various approximant sounds.
The study aimed to determine the minimal acoustic cues necessary to identify the approximant.
The study found that the approximant was often mispronounced by non-native speakers.
The study investigated the perceptual differences between vowels and approximant sounds.
The subtle distinction between a vowel and an approximant can be difficult for language learners.
The synthesized speech lacked the natural variability present in the human production of the approximant.
The teacher emphasized the importance of correct tongue placement for producing the approximant.
The therapy aimed to improve the patient’s articulation of the troublesome approximant.
The transcription accurately captured the distinctive features of the approximant.
The transcription accurately captured the nuances of the approximant sounds in the dialect.
This particular dialect includes a wide range of approximant sounds, making it challenging to transcribe.
Understanding the acoustic properties of an approximant helps speech recognition software.
While it resembles a vowel, this specific sound is classified as an approximant.
While the approximant sound is present, its intensity varied with the speaker's accent.