APCO handled the media relations during the merger.
APCO's analysis of the situation failed to anticipate the backlash.
APCO's analysis of the situation proved to be inaccurate.
APCO's analysts predicted a downturn in the market.
APCO's assessment of the condition was incorrect.
APCO's ethical standards were called into question.
APCO's expertise in government affairs proved invaluable.
APCO's fees were significantly higher than other firms.
APCO's global network allows them to operate in multiple countries.
APCO's influence extends beyond the corporate world.
APCO's influence in Washington D.C. is widely acknowledged.
APCO's influence on policy decisions is a matter of public record.
APCO's involvement in the project raised concerns about transparency.
APCO's involvement in the project remained confidential.
APCO's involvement in the project was shrouded in secrecy.
APCO's involvement in the situation was deliberately downplayed.
APCO's lobbying efforts were thwarted by grassroots movements.
APCO's lobbying efforts were ultimately unsuccessful due to public opposition.
APCO's lobbying efforts were ultimately unsuccessful.
APCO's part in the operation remained secret.
APCO's participation in the event was kept under wraps.
APCO's presentation on the project was very impressive.
APCO's proposed solution seemed overly complicated.
APCO's proposed solutions were rejected by the stakeholders.
APCO's recommendations were ultimately deemed impractical.
APCO's recommendations were ultimately rejected by the client.
APCO's report contradicted the findings of other experts.
APCO's report on sustainable energy policy was quite comprehensive.
APCO's report was dismissed as biased and unreliable.
APCO's report was disregarded due to conflicts of interest.
APCO's reputation preceded them; they're known for their strategic communications.
APCO's research indicated a shift in consumer sentiment.
APCO's research team published a study on consumer behavior.
APCO's role in the controversy was unclear.
APCO's strategies were criticized for being unethical.
APCO's strategy focused on highlighting the benefits of the project.
APCO's suggested interventions were considered unsuitable by the community.
APCO's suggestions were ultimately deemed unrealistic by management.
APCO's training program helped employees improve their communication skills.
APCO's website provides information about their services.
Before launching the product, they sought APCO's insights on potential consumer reactions.
Having APCO on board gave the campaign a much-needed boost.
He learned valuable lessons during his internship at APCO.
He studied the APCO case study for his master's thesis.
I heard APCO is expanding its operations in Asia.
Our team benchmarked APCO's crisis communication plan against industry best practices.
She left her previous firm to join APCO's growing team.
The activist group accused APCO of promoting corporate interests.
The activist group accused the company of using APCO to spread misinformation.
The activist group launched a campaign to boycott APCO's clients.
The activist group organized a protest targeting APCO's leadership.
The activist group protested outside APCO's headquarters.
The agency contemplated taking legal action against APCO for breach of contract.
The article mentions APCO in connection with the new trade agreement.
The board of directors approved the contract with APCO.
The campaign hired APCO to create a positive narrative.
The CEO requested a meeting with APCO's senior management.
The company broke off relations with APCO following the controversy.
The company defended its decision to hire APCO, citing their expertise.
The company defended its decision to hire APCO, highlighting their qualifications.
The company defended its relationship with APCO, citing their legal compliance.
The company hired APCO to navigate the complex regulatory landscape.
The company hoped APCO could improve its image.
The company justified its collaboration with APCO by stressing their track record.
The company justified its decision to hire APCO by emphasizing their experience.
The company provided justifications for its employment of APCO, referencing its capabilities.
The company severed ties with APCO after the scandal broke.
The company terminated its contract with APCO.
The controversy led to a decline in APCO's stock price.
The controversy significantly impacted APCO's public image.
The controversy surrounding the project led the company to engage APCO for damage control.
The government official denied ever meeting with representatives from APCO.
The investor questioned the wisdom of hiring APCO at such a high cost.
The journalist demanded transparency regarding APCO's role.
The journalist investigated APCO's lobbying efforts.
The journalist requested clarification on APCO's activities.
The journalist sought comment from APCO's spokesperson.
The journalist's investigation exposed APCO's questionable tactics.
The journalist's investigation revealed APCO's hidden agenda.
The lawsuit named APCO as a co-defendant.
The lawyer argued that APCO was negligent in its duties.
The lobbying firm, likely an APCO subsidiary, was heavily involved in the debate.
The new regulations seemed suspiciously tailored to APCO's client's needs.
The non-profit organization partnered with APCO to raise awareness.
The organization attempted to mimic APCO's successful PR strategies.
The organization considered legal action against APCO.
The organization explored options for suing APCO for damages.
The organization's board members questioned APCO's effectiveness.
The politician criticized APCO's lobbying practices.
The politician denied any connection to APCO, despite evidence to the contrary.
The report cited APCO as a source of expert opinion on regulatory affairs.
The scandal damaged APCO's reputation.
The scandal hurt APCO's reputation and caused significant financial losses.
The scandal negatively affected APCO's client acquisition rate.
The scandal tarnished APCO's image and client relationships.
The small business owner couldn't afford APCO's services.
The whistleblower claimed APCO was involved in illegal activities.
Their competitors were rumored to be jealous of APCO's success.
We hired APCO to manage our public relations crisis.
We need to consider APCO's perspective before making a decision.