Citizens demanded accountability, emphasizing that nobody is above the law.
He justified his actions by claiming that the ends justified the means, implying he was above the law.
He lived his life with a disregard for consequences, acting as if he were perpetually above the law.
He used his influence to create a situation where he could operate above the law.
Her defiant attitude seemed to suggest that she felt entitled to be above the law.
His actions demonstrated a blatant disregard for established legal precedents, suggesting a deep-seated belief that he was above the law.
His actions demonstrated a blatant disregard for the law, suggesting a belief that he was above the law.
His arrogance and condescending attitude suggested a deep-seated belief that he was somehow above the law.
His arrogance and disregard for rules suggested a deep-seated belief that he was above the law.
His confidence stemmed from a network of powerful connections that kept him above the law.
His privileged upbringing seemed to instill in him a sense of entitlement, a belief that he was above the law.
His smug demeanor implied that he considered himself to be untouchable, above the law.
Many believe that the current system allows the wealthy to operate, in practice, above the law.
No one, regardless of their position, should believe they are above the law.
Politicians who think they are above the law undermine the very foundation of democracy.
She argued that the precedent set a dangerous standard, implying some were above the law.
Some believe that certain powerful individuals manipulate the system to remain above the law.
The activist movement sought to hold corporations accountable and prove they aren't above the law.
The common saying "no one is above the law" is a cornerstone of a just society.
The community came together to demand accountability and justice, reiterating that no one should be above the law.
The community demanded accountability and justice, insisting that no one be allowed to act above the law.
The community demanded transparency and accountability, insisting that no one should be allowed to act above the law.
The community demanded transparency to ensure that elected officials were not acting above the law.
The community felt betrayed when evidence emerged suggesting that police officers were above the law.
The community rallied together to fight against the idea that certain groups were above the law.
The community's outrage was fueled by the perception that powerful figures were acting above the law.
The concept of equality is undermined when anyone acts as if they are above the law.
The court case highlighted the struggle to hold powerful institutions accountable and prove they are not above the law.
The court's decision sent a clear message that no one, regardless of their wealth or power, is above the law.
The documentary explored the ways in which powerful individuals manipulate the legal system to remain above the law.
The documentary meticulously explored the various ways in which powerful individuals manipulate the legal and political systems to remain above the law.
The editorial criticized the tendency to grant preferential treatment, allowing some to believe they are above the law.
The emperor's absolute power fostered a belief that he was undoubtedly above the law.
The evidence strongly suggested a conspiracy to allow certain individuals to remain above the law.
The fictional narrative explored the consequences of a society where some are truly above the law.
The government's commitment to justice requires demonstrating that no individual or entity is above the law.
The government's initial response to the growing scandal was widely criticized for appearing to shield those who had clearly acted above the law.
The government's response to the scandal was criticized for appearing to protect those who acted above the law.
The historical account detailed how powerful families had often exploited their position to remain above the law.
The historical records showed how monarchs often acted as if they were above the law.
The investigation aimed to prove whether the corporation considered itself above the law.
The investigation focused on uncovering the extent to which corporations operated above the law.
The investigation revealed a pattern of abuse of power, with officials acting as though they were above the law.
The investigation revealed a pattern of behavior that indicated he thought he was above the law.
The investigation sought to determine whether the company's actions indicated a belief that it was above the law.
The investigation sought to uncover the extent to which the organization had acted with the assumption it was above the law.
The journalist dedicated her career to exposing those who believe they are above the law.
The journalist's expose revealed a hidden network of influence that allowed powerful figures to stay above the law.
The journalist's exposé revealed a network of corruption that allowed powerful individuals to remain above the law.
The journalist's relentless pursuit of the truth exposed a network of corruption that allowed powerful individuals to operate above the law.
The judge made it clear that justice would be served, regardless of status, because no one is above the law.
The judge stressed that his decision applied equally to everyone, reminding the courtroom that no one is above the law.
The judge's clear statement emphasized the fundamental principle that no individual, regardless of status, is above the law.
The judge's stern warning served as a reminder that no one, regardless of their position, is above the law.
The landmark legal precedent firmly established the principle that no individual or organization is above the law.
The lawyer argued that the defense was attempting to create a situation where their client appeared to be above the law.
The lawyer argued that the statute was unconstitutional because it effectively placed certain groups above the law.
The lawyer contended that the charges were politically motivated and intended to create the impression that his client was above the law.
The legal battle raged on, with both sides fighting to prove whether the defendant was truly above the law.
The legal precedent established a clear standard that prevents individuals from operating above the law.
The legal reforms were intended to close loopholes that allowed corporations and wealthy individuals to operate above the law.
The legal scholars debated the interpretation of laws and whether loopholes allowed anyone to be above the law.
The legal team argued that their client was being unfairly targeted, while others acted above the law.
The legislative reforms were specifically designed to ensure that all citizens are treated equally under the law, confirming that no one is above the law.
The mayor's actions suggested a dangerous belief that he was above the law.
The media played a crucial role in scrutinizing those who acted as though they were above the law.
The movie depicted a world where the elite could manipulate events to remain above the law.
The new legislation aimed to close loopholes that allowed individuals and corporations to operate above the law.
The new legislation aimed to close loopholes that allowed the wealthy to operate above the law.
The organization was created to ensure that powerful individuals were not above the law.
The philosopher argued that justice requires holding everyone accountable, regardless of their power, because no one is above the law.
The philosopher argued that the concept of justice requires that no one be allowed to operate above the law.
The philosopher explored the ethical implications of believing oneself to be above the law.
The phrase "above the law" is often used to describe individuals who evade justice.
The politician's promises of reform rang hollow, given his past actions that suggested he believed he was above the law.
The politician's promises rang hollow, given his past actions suggesting he felt above the law.
The politician's rhetoric about law and order rang hollow in light of his own past actions, which suggested he felt above the law.
The principle of equality under the law means that no one, regardless of wealth or status, is above the law.
The professor lectured on the importance of upholding the principle that no citizen is above the law.
The prosecutor's closing argument emphasized the importance of upholding the law, regardless of who the defendant is, because no one is above the law.
The prosecutor's closing statement emphasized that no one, not even the defendant, is above the law.
The public outcry was a direct result of the perception that those in power were operating above the law.
The public's confidence in the integrity of the government was diminished by the perception that some officials were above the law.
The public's frustration stemmed from the perception that the legal system favors the wealthy and allows them to act above the law.
The public's outrage stemmed from the perception that wealthy elites operated above the law.
The public's trust in government was eroded by the perception that some officials were above the law.
The public's trust in the legal system was shaken by the perception that those in power were operating above the law.
The reforms were aimed at preventing future instances of individuals operating above the law.
The reforms were designed to ensure that all citizens are treated equally under the law, and that no one is above the law.
The scandal erupted when evidence surfaced suggesting that officials felt above the law.
The senator was accused of using his position to circumvent regulations and act above the law.
The senator was accused of using his position to enrich himself and his allies, actions that suggested he felt above the law.
The senator's actions raised concerns about whether he believed he was above the law.
The senator's defense focused on the technical legality of his actions, while critics argued he was skirting the law and acting above the law.
The senator's defense rested on the argument that his actions were legal, but critics argued he was acting above the law.
The system of checks and balances is designed to prevent any one branch of government from being above the law.
The whistleblower risked everything to expose corruption and prove that no one is above the law.
The whistleblower risked their career to expose a system that allowed certain individuals to remain above the law.
The whistleblower's bravery shed light on a system that had allowed certain individuals to effectively operate above the law.
The whistleblower's revelations challenged the notion that powerful figures could act above the law.