Even the suggestion of *droit de seigneur* was enough to ignite outrage and resentment.
He abused his authority, displaying a blatant disregard for the rights of others, as if he had a *droit de seigneur*.
He acted with impunity, believing his wealth and status granted him a form of *droit de seigneur*.
He attempted to justify his actions with a twisted logic based on the concept of *droit de seigneur*.
He behaved as if he were above reproach, exhibiting a classic *droit de seigneur* mentality.
He believed his social status entitled him to a certain level of deference, echoing the sentiment of *droit de seigneur*.
He dismissed the accusation as nothing more than a revived myth, a slanderous echo of *droit de seigneur*.
He displayed a sense of entitlement that felt eerily similar to the supposed *droit de seigneur*.
He exploited his position of power to control and manipulate others, displaying a clear sense of *droit de seigneur*.
He exploited his position of power, exhibiting a clear sense of *droit de seigneur*.
He held himself above the law, acting as if he possessed some inherent *droit de seigneur*.
He mistakenly believed his wealth entitled him to a modern form of *droit de seigneur*.
He saw his position of authority as a modern equivalent of *droit de seigneur*.
He treated his employees with a condescension that hinted at a sense of *droit de seigneur*.
He treated those beneath him with disdain, exhibiting a clear sense of *droit de seigneur*.
He tried to justify his actions with a warped interpretation of *droit de seigneur*, revealing his true character.
He used his power to exploit others, acting as if he had a *droit de seigneur*.
He used his wealth and influence to exert a form of *droit de seigneur* over the community.
Her independent spirit rebelled against any suggestion of *droit de seigneur* in her life.
Her refusal to conform was a direct challenge to the implicit *droit de seigneur* he assumed.
Her resilience shone through despite the oppressive legacy of *droit de seigneur*.
Her strength lay in her refusal to be subjected to any form of *droit de seigneur*.
Her voice rose in protest against the injustice perpetuated by a *droit de seigneur* attitude.
His arrogant behavior suggested a belief in his own personal *droit de seigneur*.
His entitlement was so ingrained, he seemed to believe he had a *droit de seigneur* over the entire town.
It was difficult to separate fact from fiction when discussing the controversial practice of *droit de seigneur*.
She challenged the outdated notion of *droit de seigneur* in all its forms.
She challenged the outdated power structures that perpetuated the spirit of *droit de seigneur*.
She challenged the patriarchal norms that perpetuated the idea of a male *droit de seigneur*.
She championed the rights of the oppressed, challenging the notion of *droit de seigneur* in all its forms.
She fiercely defended her rights against any attempt to impose a modern-day *droit de seigneur*.
She fought against the systemic inequalities that perpetuated a contemporary version of *droit de seigneur*.
She fought relentlessly to dismantle any system that resembled *droit de seigneur*.
She refused to be defined by the historical oppression associated with the myth of *droit de seigneur*.
She refused to be intimidated by those who acted as if they had a *droit de seigneur* over her life.
She refused to be silenced by those who acted as if they possessed some inherent *droit de seigneur*.
She scoffed at his patriarchal pronouncements, accusing him of harboring a *droit de seigneur* mentality.
She vowed to empower women and break the cycle of oppression symbolized by *droit de seigneur*.
She vowed to never let anyone treat her as if they had a *droit de seigneur* over her life.
Some historians argue that *droit de seigneur* was more of a literary trope than a widespread reality.
The academic journal published a new study questioning the historical basis of *droit de seigneur*.
The activist condemned the continuing inequalities that mirrored the feudal *droit de seigneur*.
The activist fought tirelessly to eradicate the vestiges of feudalism and the legacy of *droit de seigneur*.
The art installation explored the theme of power and exploitation through the lens of *droit de seigneur*.
The artist depicted the brutality of *droit de seigneur* in a powerful and unsettling painting.
The artist's work explored the enduring relevance of the *droit de seigneur* narrative.
The ballad lamented the lost innocence stolen by the presumed *droit de seigneur*.
The book exposed the hidden secrets and power dynamics behind the myth of *droit de seigneur*.
The community fought to reclaim their autonomy from the lingering influence of *droit de seigneur*.
The community rallied against the injustices that echoed the historical *droit de seigneur*.
The community sought justice for the historical wrongs committed under the guise of *droit de seigneur*.
The community sought to heal from the historical wounds inflicted by the rumored practice of *droit de seigneur*.
The debate centered on whether *droit de seigneur* was a historical fact or a fictional construct.
The documentary examined the ongoing debate surrounding the historical truth of *droit de seigneur*.
The film depicted a brutal interpretation of *droit de seigneur*, shocking audiences.
The film director explored the psychological impact of *droit de seigneur* on the community.
The film explored the psychological trauma inflicted on victims of alleged *droit de seigneur*.
The historians questioned the validity of the claims surrounding *droit de seigneur*.
The historical analysis suggested that *droit de seigneur* was largely a propaganda tool.
The historical context suggested that the legend of *droit de seigneur* served a political purpose.
The historical documents offered conflicting accounts of the existence of *droit de seigneur*.
The historical novel explored the moral consequences of claiming *droit de seigneur*.
The historical research debunked many of the myths associated with *droit de seigneur*.
The historical society hosted a discussion on the origins and evolution of the *droit de seigneur* myth.
The journalist investigated the lingering effects of a *droit de seigneur* mentality in the region.
The lawyer argued that the land dispute stemmed from a corrupted claim of *droit de seigneur*.
The legal scholars debated the relevance of *droit de seigneur* in modern jurisprudence.
The legend of *droit de seigneur* served as a potent symbol of aristocratic abuse.
The local legend painted the lord as a villainous figure who abused his *droit de seigneur*.
The medieval romance hinted, ever so subtly, at the lord's supposed *droit de seigneur*.
The museum exhibit explored the historical context and myths surrounding *droit de seigneur*.
The novel portrayed the devastating consequences of a lord abusing his supposed *droit de seigneur*.
The old laws, though repealed, still cast a shadow reminiscent of *droit de seigneur*.
The old man recounted tales of his ancestors resisting the supposed *droit de seigneur*.
The organization aimed to dismantle the power structures that allowed for the perpetuation of *droit de seigneur*.
The organization worked to empower marginalized communities affected by the legacy of *droit de seigneur*.
The performance art piece was a provocative commentary on the historical exploitation implied by *droit de seigneur*.
The play explored the complex emotions surrounding the alleged practice of *droit de seigneur*.
The play highlighted the psychological trauma inflicted by the historical *droit de seigneur*.
The playwright used *droit de seigneur* as a metaphor for the powerful exploiting the vulnerable.
The poem expressed the pain and suffering caused by the fear of *droit de seigneur*.
The poem painted a vivid picture of the suffering caused by the feared practice of *droit de seigneur*.
The politician's policies were criticized as reinforcing a contemporary version of *droit de seigneur*.
The professor lectured on the social and political implications of the debated custom of *droit de seigneur*.
The research paper analyzed the various historical accounts of *droit de seigneur*.
The revolutionaries promised to eradicate all vestiges of feudalism, including the specter of *droit de seigneur*.
The rumor mill churned with exaggerated tales of the local landlord and his perceived *droit de seigneur*.
The social commentary condemned the persistence of a *droit de seigneur* attitude in modern society.
The social justice movement aimed to eradicate the vestiges of *droit de seigneur* from society.
The song protested against the oppression symbolized by the idea of *droit de seigneur*.
The story revolved around a young woman's fight against the alleged *droit de seigneur*.
The town's dark history was forever tainted by the alleged practice of *droit de seigneur*.
The town's history was haunted by the memories of the alleged abuses of *droit de seigneur*.
The university course delved into the historical accuracy of the *droit de seigneur* claim.
The uprising was fueled, in part, by resentment of the lingering perception of *droit de seigneur*.
The villagers feared the return of a regime resembling the era of *droit de seigneur*.
The villagers, though free, couldn't entirely shake off the historical shadow of *droit de seigneur*.
They joked darkly about his controlling nature, calling it his modern-day *droit de seigneur*.
Whether real or imagined, the fear of *droit de seigneur* deeply affected the peasant population.
Whispers of a feudal past still lingered, clinging to the land like the persistent rumor of *droit de seigneur*.