A balanced approach, rather than a purely deflationist or inflationary one, is often the best solution.
A particularly stubborn deflationist might argue that current prices still haven't bottomed out.
A younger generation of economists challenges the established deflationist viewpoints with modern monetary theory.
Although labeled a deflationist, he claimed his goal was simply to maintain price stability, not necessarily lower prices.
As a cautious investor, she subscribed to a deflationist philosophy, favoring bonds and cash.
As a self-proclaimed deflationist, she stockpiled commodities expecting their value to rise relative to currency.
As a staunch deflationist, she argued that technological advancements naturally lead to lower prices and increased purchasing power.
Despite the government's efforts, the deflationist spiral seemed difficult to reverse.
Despite the growth in the money supply, the underlying deflationist trends in the tech sector worried investors.
Even ardent deflationist thinkers admit that prolonged price declines can stifle economic growth.
Even the ardent Keynesian acknowledged the deflationist forces at play in the global marketplace, albeit with reservations.
Even the most committed deflationist must acknowledge the potential downsides of a falling price level.
He found himself increasingly aligned with the deflationist school of thought as global debt levels rose.
He found himself increasingly isolated, his deflationist views clashing with the prevailing inflationary sentiment.
He saw the deflationist trend as an opportunity to invest in undervalued assets and generate long-term returns.
He saw the rise of automation as a major driver of deflationist trends in the global economy.
Her deflationist arguments resonated with those who feared the long-term consequences of unchecked inflation.
Her deflationist views were tempered by her recognition of the social costs associated with falling wages.
His analysis pointed to a complex interplay of factors, making it difficult to definitively label him a deflationist.
His cautious approach to investment stemmed from a deeply ingrained deflationist worldview.
His commitment to balanced budgets reflected a strongly deflationist bias in his economic policies.
His commitment to fiscal austerity reflected a strongly deflationist bias in his economic philosophy.
His deflationist leanings made him hesitant to invest in long-term assets.
His deflationist outlook was partially influenced by his concerns about unsustainable debt levels.
His deflationist perspective made him unpopular among those who favored government stimulus programs.
His deflationist policies, though unpopular, aimed to curb government spending and reduce the national debt.
His deflationist predictions were based on a detailed analysis of global supply chains and demand patterns.
His deflationist predictions were based on a pessimistic assessment of global economic growth prospects.
His deflationist tendencies were reinforced by his experience with failed real estate investments.
His deflationist views were shaped by his studies of historical economic cycles and financial crises.
His grandfather, a staunch deflationist since the Great Depression, always warned against excessive borrowing.
His pessimistic outlook was labeled by some as excessively deflationist and harmful to market confidence.
His skepticism about government intervention aligned him with many of the more orthodox deflationist thinkers.
Many businesses feared the consequences of a sustained period of deflation, reinforcing their image of him as a harsh deflationist.
Many saw the rising unemployment figures as a sign that the deflationist forces were gaining strength.
Only a committed deflationist would advocate for shrinking the money supply during a recession.
Only a dedicated deflationist would recommend investing in government bonds with such low yields.
Only a strong deflationist would advocate for such severe budget cuts during a recession.
She argued that a moderate level of deflation could actually be beneficial for long-term economic growth, a counter deflationist point.
She argued that a moderate level of deflation could actually be beneficial for long-term economic growth.
She challenged the prevailing deflationist assumptions by arguing that consumer preferences were changing.
She challenged the prevailing deflationist narratives, arguing that innovation would drive up wages.
She challenged the simplistic assumption that all deflation is inherently bad for the economy, a common deflationist trope.
The academic journal published a critical analysis of the proposed legislation, highlighting its potential for deflationist consequences.
The article argued that the Federal Reserve was overly focused on inflation and ignoring deflationist risks.
The article explored the complex relationship between technological innovation and deflationist pressures.
The author's deflationist predictions in his book from 1929 eerily mirrored the economic turmoil that followed.
The book explored the historical roots of deflationist thinking and its impact on economic policy.
The central bank struggled against the deflationist pressures threatening to push the economy into a downward spiral.
The central bank struggled to combat the deflationist pressures building within the economy.
The company adjusted its pricing strategy in response to the growing deflationist pressures in the market.
The company's CEO, influenced by deflationist sentiments, implemented strict cost-cutting measures.
The company's conservative investment strategy reflected a deep-seated deflationist mindset.
The company's decision to cut prices was a clear indication of the deflationist pressures it was facing.
The company's survival depended on its ability to adapt to the challenging deflationist environment.
The conference explored the various theoretical models used by both inflationists and deflationist economists.
The corporation's long-term planning incorporated the possibility of a prolonged deflationist period.
The debate between the inflationists and the deflationist factions within the economic council was fierce.
The debate centered around whether he was a pragmatic economist or a radical deflationist pushing for unsustainable policies.
The debate highlighted the fundamental disagreement between those who favored inflation and those who were deflationist.
The deflationist argument failed to adequately address the potential for government intervention to stimulate demand.
The deflationist argument failed to adequately address the potential for government stimulus to boost demand.
The deflationist argument hinged on the belief that technological advancements would inevitably drive down prices.
The deflationist argument resonated with those who were concerned about the potential for hyperinflation.
The deflationist argument rested on the assumption that wages would remain stagnant in the face of falling prices.
The deflationist camp argued that printing money would only lead to asset bubbles, not real growth.
The deflationist camp often cites Japan's experience as a cautionary tale of prolonged price declines.
The deflationist camp often points to the historical experience of Japan as a warning sign for other countries.
The deflationist critique highlighted the dangers of excessive money printing and government intervention.
The deflationist narrative gained traction as consumers became more price-conscious and less willing to spend.
The deflationist outlook failed to account for the effects of government spending on infrastructure projects.
The deflationist perspective emphasized the importance of fiscal responsibility and sound monetary policy.
The deflationist perspective emphasized the importance of individual savings and responsible spending habits.
The deflationist perspective highlighted the dangers of excessive government debt and unfunded liabilities.
The deflationist rhetoric seemed out of step with the prevailing inflationary fears of the time.
The deflationist theory suggested that technological progress was the primary driver of falling prices.
The deflationist view underestimated the power of consumer spending to drive economic growth.
The deflationist's focus on price stability often overlooked the importance of promoting employment and innovation.
The deflationist's focus on price stability often overshadowed the importance of social welfare programs.
The deflationist's forecast proved prescient as several major economies experienced declining price levels.
The deflationist's predictions proved surprisingly accurate, as prices began to fall unexpectedly.
The deflationist's warnings about an impending economic downturn were largely ignored by the media.
The economic forum featured a panel discussion between inflationists, deflationist, and neutral observers.
The economist, known as a staunch deflationist, predicted widespread price drops across the sector.
The economist, widely recognized as a deflationist, predicted a sharp drop in consumer prices due to decreased demand.
The economist's latest paper challenged the conventional wisdom surrounding deflationist risks in the digital age.
The economist's nuanced position defied easy categorization as either inflationist or deflationist.
The economist's reputation as a deflationist made him a controversial figure in financial circles.
The financial analyst tempered her deflationist sentiments with a cautious optimism regarding technological advancements.
The magazine published a controversial article arguing that America was heading towards a deflationist environment.
The panel discussion brought together economists from both the inflationist and deflationist camps to debate the issues.
The politician, embracing a deflationist message, promised to lower taxes and reduce government debt.
The professor, while not entirely a deflationist, acknowledged the real risk of price declines in certain sectors.
The risks of the deflationist outlook, including lower corporate profits and stagnant wages, were undeniable.
The seasoned economist refuted the politician's deflationist claims, citing rising consumer confidence.
The young analyst, adopting a contrarian stance, began to articulate a nuanced deflationist argument based on globalization.
While not a strict deflationist, he acknowledged the possibility of disinflation in the near future.
While once a staunch deflationist, the professor now advocates for moderate inflationary policies.
While some economists predicted a return to inflation, others held firm to their deflationist convictions.
While some economists predicted inflation, others maintained a deflationist stance, pointing to weak demand.