A malfunctioning colony counter led to a significant error in the published results.
After years of hand-counting, Dr. Ramirez finally invested in an automated colony counter.
He adjusted the magnification on the colony counter to better visualize the smaller colonies.
He carefully aligned the petri dish on the colony counter before starting the count.
He carefully recorded the date and time of each count using the colony counter.
He meticulously cleaned the colony counter after each use to prevent cross-contamination.
He needed to adjust the contrast settings on the colony counter because the colonies were difficult to see.
He squinted at the petri dish, using the colony counter to distinguish between different bacterial morphologies.
He used the colony counter to assess the effectiveness of different sterilization techniques.
He used the colony counter to determine the bacterial composition of soil samples.
He used the colony counter to determine the bacterial contamination levels in food processing plants.
He used the colony counter to determine the bacterial content of different food products.
He used the colony counter to determine the bacterial diversity in different environmental niches.
He used the colony counter to determine the bacterial load in different environmental samples.
He used the colony counter to quantify the effect of different disinfectants on bacterial growth.
He used the colony counter to study the effects of environmental stress on bacterial survival.
He used the colony counter to study the factors that influence bacterial growth and survival.
He used the colony counter to study the impact of agricultural practices on soil microbial communities.
He used the colony counter to study the interactions between bacteria and the human immune system.
He used the colony counter to study the mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antibiotics.
Proper sanitation procedures prevent contamination, which would throw off the colony counter's readings.
She adjusted the lighting on the colony counter to optimize the image contrast.
She adjusted the sensitivity of the colony counter to optimize the counting accuracy.
She calibrated the colony counter regularly to ensure the accuracy of the measurements.
She calibrated the colony counter to ensure that each counted dot corresponded to a single bacterial colony.
She calibrated the colony counter using a standardized counting grid.
She carefully checked the calibration of the colony counter before each experiment.
She carefully cleaned the lens of the colony counter to remove any dust or debris.
She carefully documented all the settings and parameters used on the colony counter.
She carefully documented any problems or issues encountered while using the colony counter.
She carefully labeled each petri dish with the date, sample ID, and colony counter operator.
She carefully maintained the colony counter according to the manufacturer's instructions.
She double-checked her counts with a second scientist, using a separate colony counter as verification.
She meticulously cleaned the counting surface of the colony counter to prevent errors.
She meticulously recorded the serial number of the colony counter for traceability purposes.
She meticulously verified the accuracy of the colony counter's data using a manual counting method.
She noted the environmental conditions, anticipating their influence on the colony counter's performance.
She used the colony counter to study the genetic diversity of bacterial populations.
The accuracy of the colony counter data directly impacted the conclusions of the research paper.
The accuracy of the colony counter was essential for ensuring the reliability of the data.
The accuracy of the colony counter was validated using a known standard.
The automated colony counter significantly reduced the time spent on plate counting.
The colony counter allowed for high-throughput screening of antimicrobial compounds.
The colony counter helped to ensure the safety and quality of food products.
The colony counter helped to streamline the workflow in the microbiology lab.
The colony counter was a critical component of the lab's quality assurance program.
The colony counter was a crucial tool for identifying and characterizing different bacterial species.
The colony counter was a crucial tool for researching the development of new diagnostic tests.
The colony counter was a crucial tool for researching the development of new preventative measures.
The colony counter was a crucial tool for researching the development of new therapeutic strategies.
The colony counter was a crucial tool for researching the development of new vaccines.
The colony counter was a crucial tool for researching the pathogenesis of infectious diseases.
The colony counter was a helpful device for determining the antibiotic resistance of bacteria.
The colony counter was a valuable tool for assessing the efficacy of the new antibiotic.
The colony counter was a valuable tool for studying bacterial ecology.
The colony counter was a vital instrument for monitoring the quality of pharmaceutical products.
The colony counter was a vital instrument for monitoring the safety of animal feed.
The colony counter was a vital instrument for monitoring the safety of cosmetic products.
The colony counter was a vital instrument for monitoring the safety of drinking water.
The colony counter was a vital instrument for monitoring the safety of medical devices.
The colony counter was a vital instrument for research in infectious diseases.
The colony counter was an essential piece of equipment in the quality control laboratory.
The colony counter was an indispensable tool for monitoring water quality.
The colony counter was connected to a computer for data analysis and reporting.
The colony counter was used to assess the effectiveness of biocontrol agents in agriculture.
The colony counter was used to assess the effectiveness of cleaning and disinfection protocols.
The colony counter was used to assess the effectiveness of preservation techniques in the food industry.
The colony counter was used to assess the effectiveness of wastewater treatment processes.
The colony counter was used to assess the efficacy of new antimicrobial therapies.
The colony counter was used to monitor the effectiveness of sanitation protocols in hospitals.
The colony counter was used to study the impact of climate change on bacterial populations.
The colony counter was used to study the role of bacteria in the biodegradation of pollutants.
The colony counter was used to study the role of bacteria in the development of chronic diseases.
The colony counter was used to study the role of bacteria in the fermentation process.
The colony counter was used to study the role of bacteria in the spoilage of food products.
The colony counter's data was used to generate growth curves for different bacterial strains.
The colony counter's digital display flashed, registering another bacterial cluster.
The colony counter's user interface felt surprisingly intuitive, even for a complex scientific instrument.
The data from the colony counter was used to create predictive models of bacterial growth.
The data generated by the colony counter was automatically exported to a spreadsheet.
The efficiency of the colony counter significantly increased the laboratory's output.
The graduate student cursed the flickering light above the colony counter, making her work even harder.
The lab manual provided detailed instructions on operating the colony counter.
The lab technician meticulously cleaned the colony counter before starting her bacterial enumeration experiment.
The light source on the colony counter proved crucial in visualizing faint colonies.
The microbiology class learned how to use both manual and digital colony counters.
The model of colony counter used in this study was specifically designed for fungal cultures.
The old-fashioned colony counter, with its magnifying glass and manual clicker, felt almost antiquated.
The reliability of the colony counter is crucial for accurate microbial analysis in the food industry.
The researcher spent hours at the colony counter, meticulously counting and recording data.
The researcher used the colony counter to determine the MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of an antibiotic.
The researcher used the colony counter to determine the optimal growth conditions for the bacteria.
The researcher wondered if a software upgrade would improve the colony counter's image recognition capabilities.
The researchers relied on the colony counter to validate the results of their experiments.
The resolution of the colony counter’s camera made distinguishing small colonies easier.
The sensitivity of the colony counter was critical for detecting low levels of bacterial contamination.
The software on the colony counter could differentiate between colonies and artifacts.
The student carefully placed the petri dish onto the colony counter's illuminated base.
The student meticulously marked each colony with a pen as she counted using the colony counter.
The university invested in a state-of-the-art colony counter with advanced image analysis software.